Up next in 10
The smoke hung thick in that back room on Mulberry Street.
Three men. One table. Photographs that would end a life.
What happened in 1972 would reshape organized crime for thirty years.
The man who brought those photos never walked out alive.
This is the pattern nobody talks about.
Evidence appears. Interest grows. Then... silence.
Based on declassified documents and verified historical records.
This video is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
The untold story of Albert Anastasia reveals how the deadliest assassin in American history operated with protection from the highest levels. From Murder Inc to the Five Families, from the Apalachin Meeting to the barbershop execution that shocked the nation. Organized crime history. Mafia documentary. Cosa Nostra secrets finally exposed.
đ Subscribe for weekly deep dives into history's darkest chapters.
đ Drop your theory in the comments below.
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~--~-~~-~~~-~~-~--~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
đľď¸ââď¸ Global Mafia Universe - https://www.youtube.com/@GlobalMafiaUniverse?sub_confirmation=1
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~--~-~~-~~~-~~-~--~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
â ď¸ Content Disclaimer
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
The room went silent. Not the comfortable silence of waiting. The kind
0:06
that makes your chest tighten. The kind that says something is wrong. It was
0:13
1972. A backroom in a social club on Malbury
0:18
Street. The smoke from a dozen cigars hung thick in the air. Three men sat
0:25
around a table covered in green felt. No cards, no chips, just photographs.
0:33
One of the men picked up a photograph. Studied it. His face revealed nothing,
0:40
but his hands were shaking. "This changes everything," he said. The man
0:47
across from him leaned forward. "You know what has to happen now?" The third
0:53
man stayed silent. He was the one who had brought the photographs.
0:59
He was also the one who would not leave that room alive. Outside the city moved on. Taxes honked.
1:08
People walked past the unmarked door. Nobody knew that inside a decision was
1:15
being made that would reshape organized crime in America for the next 30 years.
1:22
The man with the photographs stood up slowly. He knew what was coming. He had seen it
1:29
happen to others. The way conversations suddenly stopped. The way eyes avoided
1:36
his. The way old friends crossed the street when they saw him. He had three
1:43
options. Run, fight, except running was
1:48
impossible. They had people everywhere at the airports,
1:54
at the bus stations, at his mother house in Brooklyn. Fighting was suicide.
2:00
He was good with his hands. But he was not good enough to fight an entire
2:06
organization. So he accepted. Can I make a phone call?
2:12
He asked. The boss shook his head. No calls.
2:18
Not anymore. That was 1972. The photographs never surfaced. The man
2:25
was never seen again. And the secret he carried died with him. Or so they
2:32
thought. This is one story, one moment, one piece of a pattern that stretches
2:40
back more than a century. The pattern is always the same. Evidence appears.
2:47
documentation is created, interest grows, and then silence. Not because the
2:56
evidence was proven false, not because the documentation was
3:01
discredited, because both simply disappeared.
3:06
Albert Anastasia's fall from power inside the mafia's deadliest
3:11
assassination is not just a story. It is a case study in how history gets erased.
3:19
And once you see the pattern, you cannot unsee it. Let us go back to where this
3:25
pattern started. 1931, New York City. The five families were
3:33
still finding their shape. Prohibition was ending and the smart money was
3:39
moving into new territories. gambling, unions, construction.
3:46
A young man from Brooklyn was making a name for himself, not through diplomacy,
3:53
through violence, through a willingness to do what others would not. He grew up in Ocean Hill, in
4:01
a neighborhood where violence was the only currency that mattered. His father
4:06
worked the docks when there was work. His mother took in laundry. They lived
4:12
in a railroad apartment with no heat in winter and no ventilation in summer. By
4:19
the time he was 14, he had been arrested twice. By 16, he had killed his first
4:27
man. A dispute over a card game. The other man pulled a knife. He pulled
4:34
something faster. The neighborhood noticed. The people who ran things
4:39
noticed and they saw something in him that they could use. He was not smart in
4:46
the traditional sense. He could barely read. Numbers confused him, but he had
4:53
an instinct for violence that bordered on artistry. He knew how to hurt people
4:59
in ways that sent messages. He knew how to make examples that nobody
5:05
forgot. By 1935, he was a made man. By 1940, he was
5:13
running his own crew. By 1950, he had killed more men than he could remember.
5:21
The newspapers called him a monster. The men who worked with him called him
5:27
something else entirely. They called him necessary. But who was he before the legend? Before
5:35
the bodies, before the whispered conversations that stopped whenever he
5:41
entered a room? That is the question nobody wanted to answer because the answer revealed
5:48
something uncomfortable about the system that created him. Now one case an
5:55
anomaly records get lost. things disappear in
6:00
institutional archives. But this was not one case.
6:06
1936, Chicago, a different city, but the same
6:12
pattern emerging. A man walked into a barber shop on the south side. He sat in the chair, asked
6:20
for a shave. The barber, an older Italian named Jeppe, wrapped his face in
6:27
a hot towel. When the towel came off, three men were standing behind the
6:33
chair. The customer saw them in the mirror. He did not move. He did not
6:40
flinch. He knew exactly who they were and why they had come. "You know why we
6:47
are here," one of them said. His voice was calm, almost friendly. The customer
6:56
nodded slightly. I know you talk to people you should not
7:01
have talked to. I know there is nothing personal in this. You understand that? I
7:10
understand. They took him out through the back. No struggle, no seeing. The
7:17
barber finished his next customer like nothing had happened. He had seen things
7:23
like this before in the old country in Chicago. It was the way things were. 3
7:31
days later, pieces of the man were found in four different locations across the
7:37
city. His torso in a drainage ditch in Cicero. His arms in a dumpster behind a
7:44
restaurant in Little Italy. his legs in a railard on the south side. His head
7:51
was never recovered. The message was clear. Talk to the wrong people and you
7:58
become a geography lesson. No witnesses, no arrests.
8:03
No investigation that led anywhere. The newspapers reported it. The police filed
8:10
it. And then silence. The pattern was forming. But nobody saw it yet because
8:18
each discovery happened in isolation. Each disappearance had its own
8:24
explanation. Each institutional response seemed reasonable in the moment. It would take
8:32
more than a century before someone connected the dots. Before we go further, there is something
8:39
the official records never explained. And years later, one name would appear
8:46
in the margins of every major case from this era. A name that connected the dots
8:52
between violence and power, between murder and policy. But that revelation
8:59
comes later. First, you need to understand the scale of what was
9:04
happening. The organization had rules written nowhere, spoken everywhere,
9:12
passed down from father to son, from boss to soldier, from one generation to
9:19
the next. Rule number one, never talk to outsiders. Not to police, not to
9:27
journalists, not to anyone who was not part of the family. Talking was betrayal.
9:34
Betrayal was death. Rule number two, always show respect to the boss, to the
9:44
uner boss, to anyone who had earned their position through blood and
9:49
loyalty. Disrespect was remembered and punished.
9:55
Rule number three, never touch another member family, their wives,
10:02
their children, their mothers. Family was sacred, even in a world where
10:09
nothing else was. These rules created order. They created a system that
10:15
functioned for decades. They allowed men who killed for a living to sit down
10:21
together, share meals, attend weddings, baptize each other children. But the
10:28
rules also created something else. A wall of silence that protected secrets
10:35
for generations. Secrets about where the bodies were buried.
10:40
about who ordered what, about the connections between the underworld and
10:46
the legitimate world above it, connections that would have destroyed careers,
10:52
ended political dynasties, rewritten the history of American power.
10:59
Those connections were the real secret, not the murders, not the money, the
11:05
relationships. Because the organization could not have survived without protection,
11:12
without judges who dismissed cases, without prosecutors who lost evidence,
11:19
without police who looked the other way. And those people, they had the most to
11:26
lose if the truth came out. So when someone threatened to talk, the response
11:32
was swift and permanent, not because the organization wanted it, but because the
11:39
people above the organization needed it. This was not coincidence.
11:45
This was not accident. This was not the normal chaos of institutional
11:50
bureaucracy. This was a pattern. And patterns require
11:56
explanation. The explanation would not come for another century. But when it did, it
12:04
would change everything. The pattern always starts the same way. A discovery,
12:11
documentation, public attention, then institutional
12:17
acquisition for preservation, they say for proper
12:22
study, and then the evidence enters a building. and never comes out. But what
12:29
happened inside those buildings? That is what most people never ask.
12:35
1957, the Appalachian Meeting. 62 of the most
12:41
powerful organized crime figures in America gathered at a farmhouse in
12:47
upstate New York. The host was Joseph Barbara, a beverage distributor whose
12:53
real business had nothing to do with beverages. His 53 acre estate in Appalachian was
13:01
supposed to be neutral ground, a place where the families could talk without
13:06
worrying about surveillance. They came from everywhere. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles,
13:16
New Orleans, Buffalo, Kansas City, Tampa. Men who
13:23
controlled unions, construction, garbage collection, the waterfront,
13:29
men who had killed or ordered killings without a second thought. They came to
13:36
discuss the future. The organization was changing. The old ways were becoming
13:42
dangerous. Television brought too much attention. The FBI was starting to take notice.
13:51
They needed to adapt, but they were careless. Too many expensive cars with
13:57
outofstate plates at a rural estate attracted attention. A state trooper
14:04
named Edgar Cwell noticed the unusual activity. He called for backup. When the
14:12
police arrived, the men scattered into the woods. Bosses in silk suits running
14:19
through mud. Under bosses tearing their thousand coats on branches. It would
14:25
have been comical if it was not so significant. 58 men were detained. Their names were
14:33
recorded. Their photographs were taken. Their connections were documented. For
14:40
the first time, law enforcement had documented proof that organized crime
14:46
was organized, national coordinated. The FBI had denied
14:52
this for decades. Director J. Edgar Hoover had insisted
14:57
that the mafia was a myth, a fiction created by newspapers and Hollywood.
15:05
There was no national crime syndicate, he said. Just local criminals with local
15:11
concerns. Appalachian proved otherwise. But here is what the official narrative
15:18
never addressed. Who had been protecting the myth all those years? And why? Documents released
15:27
decades later would reveal a complicated relationship between federal law
15:32
enforcement and organized crime. Not corruption exactly, something more
15:38
subtle, something that served both sides. Mutual convenience.
15:45
The families provided information on communists, labor agitators,
15:52
political radicals. The bureau was obsessed with the red menace. The mob had eyes and ears in the
16:00
unions, on the docks, in the factories where communist organizers tried to
16:07
recruit. In exchange, the bureau provided tolerance, a willingness to
16:14
look the other way, an agreement that certain activities would not be
16:19
investigated too closely. This arrangement worked for everyone until it
16:25
did not. After Appalachian, Hoover could no longer pretend. The evidence was too
16:32
public, too. He had to respond.
16:38
But what he created was not a real investigation. It was a performance
16:45
designed to look good in newspapers while protecting the relationships that
16:50
mattered. This represents a fundamental shift in how institutions handled
16:56
evidence. Before this period, institutions collected everything. The mission was
17:04
comprehensive preservation. Every bone, every artifact,
17:09
every document was valuable simply because it existed. After this period,
17:16
institutions became selective. The mission became narrative reinforcement.
17:22
Evidence that supported accepted theories was preserved, studied, and
17:27
displayed. Evidence that complicated accepted theories was managed. Let us be
17:35
clear about what managed means. 1963
17:41
November Dallas. The official investigation would focus on a lone
17:47
menman Lee Harvey Oswald, a former Marine with a male order rifle
17:54
and murky political allegiances. Open and shut, they said. But from the
18:02
beginning, there were whispers about organized crime connections.
18:08
Jack Ruby, the man who killed Oswald on live television, had documented ties to
18:14
organized crime figures in Dallas and Chicago. He ran strip clubs that served
18:21
as fronts for illegal gambling. He knew people who knew people. The Warren
18:28
Commission acknowledged this, then dismissed it as irrelevant.
18:34
"Ruby was a patriot," they said, acting on impulse,
18:40
overcome with grief for the fallen president. Years later, the House Select
18:46
Committee on Assassinations would reach a different conclusion. They found that
18:52
organized crime had the motive, means, and opportunity to be involved. Robert
18:59
Kennedy, as attorney general, had been waging an unprecedented war against the
19:05
mob. His brother death would end that war. But by then, key witnesses had
19:12
died. Documents had been sealed. The trail had gone cold.
19:19
convenient timing or perhaps something else. The committee identified 15
19:26
material witnesses who died before they could testify.
19:31
Heart attacks, suicides, accidents, murders disguised as
19:37
robberies. The statistical probability of that many connected deaths occurring in that short
19:44
a period is almost impossible to calculate. But the number is vanishingly
19:51
small. This next detail changes everything we thought we knew. The
19:57
relationship between organized crime and legitimate power was never simple.
20:03
During World War II, the government made deals with imprisoned mob figures to
20:09
secure the New York waterfront against sabotage. Operation Underworld
20:16
documented. declassified. The Navy needed the docks. The mob
20:23
controlled the docks. An arrangement was made. During the Cold War, the CIA
20:30
worked with organized crime figures to attempt assassination of foreign
20:35
leaders. Operation Mongus, the plots against Castro,
20:42
documented, investigated by Congress. The agency needed people who could kill without
20:49
leaving traces. The mob had those people. The lines
20:55
between criminal and official were never as clear as the history books suggest.
21:01
And when those lines became inconvenient, the evidence of their blurring had a
21:07
tendency to disappear. 1975, the church committee hearings. For the
21:14
first time, Congress investigated the intelligence community in public. What
21:20
they found was disturbing. Assassination plots against foreign leaders,
21:27
illegal surveillance of American citizens, mind control experiments on
21:32
unwitting subjects, cooperation with criminal organizations for operations that could never be
21:40
officially sanctioned. But for every document they found, there were
21:45
references to documents that no longer existed, destroyed pursuant to records
21:51
management protocols. That phrase appears hundreds of times in the committee files.
21:58
Records management protocols. The bureaucratic term for making history
22:04
disappear. Major reports from this period establish what becomes the standard narrative for
22:10
decades. The reports are impressive, well researched, based on extensive
22:17
documentation. But here is what they do not mention. Any of the anomalous findings from the
22:25
previous decades, not the early discoveries, not the
22:30
documented cases, not the sworn testimony, not the photographic evidence, none of
22:38
it. The documentation existed in contemporary sources, in local
22:44
newspapers, in shipping manifests, in acquisition
22:49
logs, but not in the official narrative. It is as if it never happened. Take a
22:57
breath. Because from here on, the story only gets darker. The arrangement
23:04
between power and crime was never written down. It did not need to be.
23:11
Everyone understood. The politicians got their donations.
23:16
The unions got their contracts. The families got their territory. And
23:22
the public got a story. A story about lone criminals,
23:28
about isolated incidents, about bad apples in an otherwise healthy
23:34
system. The story was useful. It allowed investigations to go nowhere. It allowed
23:42
witnesses to forget. It allowed evidence to disappear into filing cabinets that
23:48
would never be opened again. But some people refused to accept the story. Some
23:55
people kept asking questions. Journalists who spent years on
24:00
investigations that never got published. Prosecutors who built cases that never
24:06
went to trial. Detectives who collected evidence that never reached a courtroom.
24:13
They all learned the same lesson. Some doors are not meant to be opened. Some
24:19
questions are not meant to be answered. Some truths are too dangerous to speak.
24:26
The ones who learned this lesson early survived. They moved on, found other
24:32
stories, built other careers. The ones who did not learn disappeared
24:40
from their jobs, from their cities, sometimes from life itself.
24:46
Not because anyone gave an order. Orders leave trails. Orders can be traced. It
24:54
happened because the system protected itself automatically,
24:59
instinctively, like a body fighting an infection. The troublemakers were isolated,
25:06
discredited, marginalized. And if that did not work, they were
25:12
eliminated not by conspiracy, by consensus.
25:18
a silent agreement among people who understood how things worked, who knew
25:24
what questions were acceptable and what questions were career ending. And that
25:31
is perhaps the most disturbing part of all. It did not require evil. It did not
25:38
require bad intentions. It only required people doing their
25:43
jobs, following protocols, protecting established frameworks.
25:50
The road to historical eraser was paved with good intentions
25:55
and professional ambition and the quiet unspoken agreement that some things are
26:02
better left unknown. Now, here is where the story takes a turn no one expected. The disappearances
26:10
were not random. When you map the cases, and researchers have done this, a
26:16
pattern emerges, not just geographically, but temporally,
26:23
and that is what makes it so disturbing. Between 1960 and 1985,
26:31
more than 40 witnesses with knowledge of organized crime connections to major
26:36
historical events died under unusual circumstances.
26:42
Some were obvious hits. Shot in restaurants, strangled in prison, blown up in their
26:50
cars. Sam Giaana, the Chicago boss who had
26:55
worked with the CIA on the Castro plots, was shot seven times in the head with a
27:02
22 caliber pistol while cooking sausages in his basement. The night before he was
27:09
scheduled to testify before the church committee, Johnny Roselli, his liaison
27:15
to the agency, was strangled and stuffed in an oil drum that was dumped in Miami
27:22
Bay. His legs had been sawed off to fit him in the container. This was shortly
27:29
after his own testimony. Others were more subtle. heart attacks,
27:36
suicides, accidents, single car crashes on empty
27:41
roads, falls from hotel windows, overdoses from drugs the victims had
27:49
never been known to use. The statistical probability of this many connected
27:55
deaths occurring naturally is improbable.
28:00
Acturies have calculated the odds. If these were random unconnected deaths,
28:07
the probability is less than one in one trillion. 1 in 1 trillion. But
28:13
probability is not proof. And without proof, the pattern remains just that, a
28:21
pattern. Pay attention to what happens next. It is easy to miss.
28:28
1978, the House Select Committee on Assassinations
28:34
interviews a key witness, a man named George Demorenshield,
28:40
a Russian immigrate with connections to both Lee Harvey Oswald and the American
28:46
intelligence community. The interview is scheduled for March 29th.
28:53
On March 29th, 3 hours before the scheduled interview, Gamoran Schult is
29:00
found dead in his daughter home in Florida. A shotgun wound to the head
29:06
ruled a suicide. His daughter disputes this. She says he was not suicidal.
29:14
She says he was looking forward to the interview. He wanted to tell his story,
29:20
but the case is closed. The interview never happens and whatever he was going
29:27
to say dies with him. This happened again and again and again. Different
29:35
witnesses, different cities, different methods,
29:41
same timing, same outcome. The evidence suggests that these patterns point to
29:47
something systematic. Not a conspiracy in the dramatic sense.
29:53
Not shadowy figures making phone calls in the night. Not secret meetings in
29:59
underground bunkers. Something more mundane and more effective.
30:05
Institutional bias. Narrative protection. career incentives that reward conformity
30:13
and punish deviation. The people implementing these patterns
30:18
were not villains. They were professionals following protocols
30:24
protecting established frameworks doing what they believed was right. And
30:31
that is what makes the pattern so durable, so resistant to exposure.
30:38
It does not require bad actors. It only requires a system that rewards certain
30:44
outcomes and punishes others. Here is a detail most people do not know. The FBI
30:53
maintained files on organized crime figures for decades, surveillance
30:58
reports, wiretap transcripts, informant reports, photographs,
31:06
financial records. When researchers requested these files under the Freedom
31:12
of Information Act, they discovered something interesting. Large sections
31:18
were redacted. expected national security, ongoing investigations,
31:25
protected sources, but other sections were simply missing.
31:31
The file index showed that certain documents existed. The numbering system confirmed they were
31:39
once there. You could see the gaps. Document 47,
31:45
document 48, document 51. Where were 49 and 50? Unable to locate,
31:54
not destroyed, not classified, just unable to locate for documents in one of
32:01
the most organized bureaucracies in the world. an agency that prides itself on
32:08
recordkeeping, that maintains files on millions of Americans,
32:14
that has never lost a single document about a civil rights leader or anti-war
32:20
protester, but documents about the intersection of organized crime and
32:25
government power unable to locate. convenient. It has been suggested that
32:32
this is where the anomalous evidence ended up. Not destroyed, not lost, but
32:39
restricted, removed from accessible cataloges, placed in storage that requires special
32:46
clearance, invisible to normal research requests.
32:52
Why? One possibility is legal protection.
32:57
Modern laws require transparency, require access,
33:02
require answers to questions. But if the materials are administratively
33:08
invisible, not in the public catalog, not available
33:13
for research, not subject to requests because officially they do not exist, then the
33:21
questions never get asked and the answers never have to be given. But
33:27
before we go further, there is something that needs to be said. The people
33:33
working in these institutions, curators, researchers, administrators,
33:40
most of them are honest professionals doing legitimate work. This is not about
33:45
individual corruption or malice. This is about institutional inertia,
33:52
about the weight of established narratives, about the difficulty of challenging
33:58
accepted models when your career depends on maintaining them. Science is not just
34:04
about evidence. It is about interpretation. And interpretation happens within
34:11
frameworks of assumption. When evidence does not fit the framework, the problem
34:17
is not always the evidence. Sometimes it is the framework.
34:22
But changing frameworks is hard. It requires admitting that previous
34:28
generations got something wrong. That decades of research were built on
34:34
incomplete information. That careers were made defending positions that may not be defensible.
34:42
That is not easy for institutions to do. That is not easy for anyone to do. The
34:50
answer to why they do not do it. That is what makes part 4 so disturbing.
34:57
The 1980s brought a new wave of prosecutions. Risko,
35:04
the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act. For the first time,
35:10
prosecutors could target entire organizations, not just individuals.
35:16
The commission trial, the pizza connection, the Windows case. One by
35:23
one, the old bosses fell. Men who had ruled for decades were suddenly facing
35:29
life sentences. But even as the trials proceeded, something strange happened. Witnesses
35:38
died. Documents disappeared. Evidence that should have been presented
35:43
never made it to court. The prosecutors called it bad luck. The defense called
35:50
it justice. The families called it business as usual. Because the system
35:57
that protected the organization was still functioning. Weakened perhaps, but not broken. The
36:05
men who went to prison were the visible ones. The bosses whose names appeared in
36:11
newspapers. The underbosses who had become too famous. But the real power, the
36:19
connections that mattered, remained hidden, protected by the same walls of
36:25
silence that had always protected them. Politicians still received their
36:31
donations. Unions still awarded their contracts.
36:37
Evidence still disappeared from filing cabinets. The faces changed. The names
36:43
changed. The methods evolved, but the pattern remained the same. And those who
36:50
understood the pattern knew better than to speak of it, because speaking was
36:56
still dangerous, perhaps more dangerous than ever. The
37:01
old rules about family and respect had weakened. The new generation was less
37:08
predictable, less bound by tradition. And the people above the organization, the legitimate
37:15
figures who benefited from the arrangement, they had more to lose than ever. More exposure, more scrutiny, more
37:25
risk. So the silence continued, the eraser continued, the management of
37:32
history continued. Not through dramatic intervention, through quiet process,
37:39
through the steady, relentless work of making inconvenient truths disappear.
37:46
The pattern is always the same. Discovery, documentation,
37:52
acquisition, disappearance, not destruction, disappearance.
37:59
There is a difference. Destruction leaves traces, creates questions,
38:06
invites investigation. Disappearance is quiet, clean, final.
38:13
And when something disappears completely enough for long enough, it might as well
38:18
never have existed. That is the goal. Not to disprove the evidence, not to
38:26
debunk the claims, just to make them invisible, inaccessible,
38:32
forgotten. And the process works. It has been working for over a century until
38:40
now. The question is not whether the evidence existed. The documentation
38:46
exists. The records exist. The contemporary accounts exist.
38:53
The question is why the physical evidence does not exist anymore.
38:58
Or does it? 2006. The FBI releases a new batch of files
39:05
under the Freedom of Information Act. Among them, references to investigations
39:11
that were never made public, connections that were documented but never pursued,
39:18
evidence that was collected but never presented. The releases are heavily
39:24
redacted. Black bars cover names, dates, operations.
39:30
Some pages are almost entirely black, but what remains is revealing.
39:36
Names appear in unexpected contexts. Mob figures meeting with government
39:43
officials. Intelligence assets working both sides.
39:49
Payments flowing in directions that contradict the official narrative.
39:54
Relationships are documented that were never acknowledged publicly. Cooperation
40:00
on operations that officially never happened. agreements that benefited both
40:06
parties. Researchers begin cross-referencing, comparing these files to other releases,
40:14
to congressional testimony, to news archives, to court documents.
40:22
Slowly a picture emerges not of a grand conspiracy but of a
40:28
system, a way of managing information of deciding what becomes history and
40:35
what gets filed away. Not because the information is false, but because it is
40:41
inconvenient. Because it complicates narratives that powerful people have invested in.
40:49
because it raises questions that nobody wants to answer, but they include one
40:54
fascinating detail. Multiple items are marked with a notation.
41:00
Transferred to archive storage pending review, not destroyed,
41:06
not lost, transferred, pending review. reviews that apparently never happened
41:14
or if they happened produce no public documentation. When researchers ask for the location of
41:22
these archive facilities, the response is information exempt under
41:28
institutional protocols. Institutional protocols for materials
41:34
that are more than a century old. for specimens that have no living relatives,
41:40
no tribal claims, no legal complications,
41:45
what institutional protocol requires this level of secrecy for 100-year-old
41:51
bones? And that silence said everything. So, let us bring this back to where we
41:58
started. Someone standing in front of evidence that would disappear.
42:03
Their story is not unique. It is representative. Researchers across decades encountering
42:11
the same pattern. Evidence that challenges accepted narratives becoming
42:16
inaccessible. Not through dramatic intervention, through quiet process, forms filed,
42:25
requests denied, appeals rejected, until eventually people stop asking. And
42:33
that is the point. Not to destroy the evidence. Destruction leaves traces.
42:41
Destruction creates martyrs. Just to make it inaccessible,
42:47
to exhaust the people asking questions, to wait them out, not through
42:52
conspiracy, through process. And the cumulative effect is the same. History is written
43:00
by those who control the evidence. And when evidence is controlled by
43:06
institutions with established narratives to protect, history becomes curated,
43:12
edited, managed, sanitized, not to reflect what happened, but to reflect
43:19
what we are allowed to know happened. The evidence raises questions that
43:24
deserve answers. Were the original discoveries authentic?
43:30
The newspaper articles were real. The photographs were real. The acquisition
43:36
records were real. The sworn affidavit were real. Whether the materials
43:43
themselves were what the reports claimed, we cannot verify because access
43:49
is restricted or denied or simply impossible to obtain.
43:56
they are missing or restricted or reclassified
44:02
or unavailable pending review. Choose whichever explanation feels right to
44:08
you. But the pattern is undeniable. Evidence was collected. Evidence was
44:15
documented. Evidence was acquired by major institutions.
44:21
And then evidence became inaccessible. That is not how science works. That is
44:29
not how open inquiry works. That is how control works. Some evidence disappears
44:37
not because it is false, but because it is inconvenient.
44:42
Was this evidence of Albert Anastasia's fall from power inside the mafia's
44:48
deadliest assassination? or evidence of how institutions decide
44:54
what history we are allowed to remember. Comment one word, evidence or control.
45:01
Mafia Crime Secrets goes deeper into stories the mainstream will not touch.
45:07
Subscribe, hit the bell. We release investigations every week. Some
45:14
mysteries invite belief. Others demand investigation.
45:19
This one does both. The files that were released tell only part of the story.
45:26
Heavily redacted, carefully edited, stripped of anything that might be too
45:33
revealing. But even the redacted files contain patterns, names that appear in
45:40
unexpected places, dates that coincide too perfectly,
45:45
connections that cannot be explained by coincidence. Researchers have spent decades piecing
45:52
together the fragments, cross-referencing the releases with other documents,
45:59
with court testimony, with news archives, with the memoirs of men who decided late
46:07
in life to tell what they knew. What emerges is not a conspiracy in the
46:13
traditional sense, not a secret cabal pulling strings from the shadows.
46:19
It is something more mundane and more disturbing. A system, a way of doing
46:27
business, a set of unwritten rules that everyone understood and nobody
46:33
questioned. The rules were simple. Protect your allies.
46:39
Destroy your enemies. And never ever let the public know how
46:45
the game is really played. These rules created a world where organized crime
46:52
and legitimate power existed in symbiosis. Each protecting the other, each
46:59
benefiting from the other, each ensuring the other's survival. And when someone
47:06
threatened to expose this relationship, they were dealt with quietly,
47:13
efficiently, permanently. Not by the mob, not by the government,
47:20
by a system that transcended both. A system that still exists today, evolved,
47:28
adapted, but fundamentally unchanged. The faces are different. The methods are
47:35
more sophisticated. The money flows through more complex channels, but the pattern remains. Power
47:44
protects power. And anyone who threatens that arrangement learns the cost. This is not
47:51
ancient history. This is happening now, today, in institutions that claim to
47:59
serve the public interest. The evidence exists. The documentation exists. The
48:06
paper trail exists, but access is denied. Questions are deflected.
48:13
Inquiries are buried in procedure, not through conspiracy,
48:18
through process, through the slow, steady, relentless
48:24
work of institutional control. And unless something changes, the pattern
48:30
will continue for another century, for another millennium,
48:36
until the evidence is not just hidden, but truly irretrievably lost. That is
48:44
the stakes. That is why this matters. That is why the questions must be asked
48:51
even when the answers are not forthcoming. Because silence is complicity and
48:58
acceptance is surrender. The evidence deserves better. History deserves
49:04
better. We deserve better. The question is whether we will demand it.