The fantasist professor Jason Arday has finally resigned.
What started as a plagiarism row has escalated into a full-blown saga, as fantastical claims made by Cambridge's youngest black professor came under scrutiny. James Hanson runs you through the story.
The University of Cambridge has confirmed it will continue investigating a professor who resigned amid a plagiarism row, adding that findings will feed into a review of the process for appointing senior academic roles.
Professor Jason Arday quit his high-profile role at the prestigious university on Wednesday after it launched a probe into his "academic qualifications and honorary appointments".
Senior dons at Cambridge are understood to be circulating a letter calling for an inquiry into the processes around his appointment, according to the Guardian.
Prof Arday's resignation followed a series of media reports alleging he plagiarised his PhD thesis - completed at Liverpool John Moores University - and other research.
Further questions were asked in the press about the truth of other claims made by the professor of sociology of education, who became Cambridge's youngest black professor in 2023, including saying that he ran 600 miles in six days and that he had raised £5.5 million for charity.
In a statement on Friday, Cambridge said: "As has been widely reported, Jason Arday has resigned from his post at the university with immediate effect.
"Regardless of this, and for clarification, the university will continue to investigate the circumstances around Jason Arday's appointment and tenure. The findings will feed into a review of the process for the appointment of senior academic roles.
"In addition, and as previously stated, the university's Research Policy Committee will review the misconduct in research policy."
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
I want to have a conversation with you this hour about a man called Jason Arday
0:05
who has been all over the news this week. If you have been following this story, you'll know it is one of the most remarkable of our times
0:13
almost a parable of our times, you might say. If you haven't been following it, strap yourself in because it's a hell of a yarn
0:21
And what I want to explore with you is who you think, who or what you think is to blame
0:26
and what it tells us about our society and some of the choices we have made over recent years
0:33
Let me bring you up to speed with the whole Jason Arde story
0:37
in case you haven't been following it. So this is a man who came to prominence a few years ago in 2023
0:43
when he was appointed as a professor at the University of Cambridge
0:47
and he became at the time the youngest black professor in Cambridge's history
0:53
He taught in the sociology department, or the education faculty, but he was a sociology teacher focusing on things like critical race theory
1:01
decolonising the curriculum, etc., etc. And because of his status as the youngest black professor in Cambridge's history
1:09
he attracted quite a lot of media attention. The BBC covered his appointment. He was invited on to Question Time
1:15
He was a guest on Laura Koonsberg's Sunday morning programme on three separate occasions
1:19
He was invited to guest edit the Today programme. He appeared on a range of podcasts and people took at face value his claims to be an academic
1:30
pioneer. He was hailed by the education faculty at the University of Cambridge as the best in the
1:36
world at what he did. But then a few weeks ago, allegations started to emerge about academic
1:44
misconduct. So there were reports of potential plagiarism in his PhD thesis. There were
1:52
questions about some of his other research. Claims were raised about whether he actually
1:57
held some of the visiting professorships at other top universities that he had claimed
2:02
There was even a suggestion that a book he had said he had written didn't actually exist at all
2:09
So people started to question the academic integrity of Professor Jason Arday
2:16
But when these allegations were raised, there was a backlash. There was a rearguard action
2:22
from people at the University of Cambridge, from his college, Jesus College, Cambridge
2:26
and from other high-profile figures, largely on the left, who accused those who raised these concerns about his academic integrity
2:36
raised these concerns about potential plagiarism, of racism. There was an open letter signed by many luminaries on the left
2:45
organised by the left-wing pressure group, the Good Law Project, which essentially accused those questioning Jason Arday's academic credentials
2:54
of being engaged in a right-wing smear campaign. Well, following that, further revelations came to light
3:04
not just about his academic credentials, but also about some of his backstory
3:09
because this is a man who would go on many a podcast, many a media outlet
3:14
and recount a pretty remarkable life story, a life story that by any measure would be, if it were true
3:22
and we'll come on to that, remarkable. So he said he was mute until the age of 11
3:28
couldn't speak until the age of 11. He said he couldn't read or write until the age of 18
3:34
He made various claims about his medical history, including being in a coma for several months
3:39
He claimed to have had a brain tumour, suffered with epilepsy, had testicular cancer
3:43
he said he experienced locked-in syndrome he also made remarkable claims about his sporting prowess
3:49
said he played at youth level for crystal palace said he was a very high level nine ball pool player
3:55
and what raised a lot of eyebrows was his claim to have run 30 marathons in 35 days the last nine
4:03
of which with a broken leg this would have made him not just a very impressive endurance athlete
4:09
but one of the greatest endurance athletes in human history. So at this point, people started to question his entire backstory
4:17
I mean, there's so much to go through. He said he was on the television programme 7-Up
4:22
that you might remember back in the day, despite the fact that it aired 20 years before he was even born
4:27
So people started going, hang on, this Jason Arday, is he potentially a plagiarist
4:33
Is he potentially a fantasist? and yet his defenders still insisted that those questioning him were just engaged in a right-wing
4:43
smear tactic now listen when this story first broke i was a little bit conflicted and i took a sort of
4:48
more nuanced view because i do think there are some on the right who will jump on any story
4:55
about someone they perceive to be a dei higher diversity equity inclusion and will come on to
5:02
that and the impact it's having in many of our institutions in a moment there are many who will
5:06
jump on such people and in quite an ugly and yes at times racist way try and press for their downfall
5:14
and i think that is true but at the same time i thought there are too many on the left who hold
5:20
diverse candidates to a lower standard and who are too quick to dismiss credible allegations as just
5:28
smears. So I took a somewhat nuanced view to begin with. And then what
5:34
changed is the news that a Times Higher Education supplement journalist a man called Jack Grove who had been looking into Jason Arday academic track record and had been emailing him questions basically for a right of reply had been reported to the police
5:52
And the Met Police, in their wisdom, decided to launch a four-month-long investigation into a journalist
6:00
who had the temerity to email Jason Arday for a right of reply to questions over his academic integrity
6:06
that is absolutely scandalous it is absurd and frankly the fact that Mark Rowley would not
6:16
when being interviewed by Nick Ferrari the other morning just apologise for it
6:20
he said they dropped the ball you can say that again I'm afraid Mark Rowley
6:24
you owe Jack Grove an apology are we living in a police state
6:29
do we investigate journalists who just email a top academic for a right of reply
6:34
is that really what we've sung to? so that was the moment i became really really angry because it became more then than just a
6:41
question about the university of cambridge appointing someone who clearly should never
6:45
have been appointed it became more than media outlets like the bbc platforming someone who
6:49
clearly is an apparent fantasist it became broader because if even the metropolitan police
6:55
are so quick to jump down the throats of people asking legitimate questions because he was crying
7:02
racism he alleged jason arday when he reported this to the police that it might have been racially
7:08
motivated these questions being sent in by times higher education journalists just saying look mate
7:13
we've got a few question marks about whether you might have plagiarized your phd thesis entirely
7:18
legitimate questions they were so so craven to this culture of dei that has taken over that they
7:26
launched a four month long investigation that to me says a lot about where we have gone wrong as a
7:32
country and I think this brings us on to a broader question which is has this entire DEI culture this
7:40
diversity equity inclusion culture and let's call it what it is it's a form of discrimination
7:45
it's positive discrimination is the old-fashioned term I mean in America they call it affirmative
7:50
action and I understand the arguments for it which is that minority groups have historically
7:54
been disadvantaged so the way you address that is that you give them a leg up now but the problem
8:01
is I don't think you can ever fix discrimination by replacing it with discrimination of a different
8:06
type and this is why what I want to explore with you this hour is not only who's to blame for this
8:12
entire Jason Arday story but what you think it says about us and whether you think the DEI culture
8:17
has gone too far. I have on one level a bit of sympathy for Jason Arday. I think he's as much a
8:24
victim of DEI culture as anything else because he was giving these Cambridge academics kind of what
8:30
they wanted they saw him as a quick way out of their historic lack of diversity there's a remarkable
8:38
remarkable interview um when he was appointed of jason r day he's filmed by the bbc with a woman
8:46
called hillary cremin who's the head of the education faculty at the university of cambridge
8:50
and the way she sort of coos over him is remarkable and it's deeply patronizing he uh she talks about
8:59
him being world-class at what he does she says we're so lucky to have you she talks about him as
9:05
if he is a kind of mascot for cambridge as if he is a a collectible almost a trinket to be wheeled
9:12
out and displayed anytime anyone accused cambridge of a lack of inclusion and to me it sums up the
9:18
soft bigotry of low expectations that many on the left i'm afraid display you know they like to
9:25
accuse people on the right of of being racist for just raising valid questions about jason
9:30
arday's academic integrity for me the real races are the people who hold diverse candidates to
9:34
lower standards and i'll tell you who i feel really sorry for the many many outstanding black
9:40
academics up and down this country who will now because of the ineptitude of cambridge university
9:46
be faced with people looking at them and going well are you just a diversity hire
9:50
I mean, this is the real problem with positive discrimination, with DEI
9:54
It fails everyone. It fails the non-diverse candidates who are denied opportunities
9:58
because they have been shunted to one side to make way for someone
10:02
who maybe doesn't actually meet the necessary criteria for the job but is promoted anyway
10:07
And it fails people of colour, minority candidates, who genuinely do meet the criteria required
10:15
but who will forevermore be tarnished with the brush of being a diversity hire
10:18
and will be open to the suspicion that they only got there through positive discrimination
10:24
Kemi Baden-Ock recently talked about DEI needing to be scrapped in some of our public institutions
10:29
I think she is right. And I think, unfortunately, Jason Arday, who's become, in a sense, a poster boy for the DEI movement
10:37
I think it needs to be a landmark moment. I think this is developing into a national scandal because it incorporates our top universities
10:43
the Metropolitan Police, the BBC and the way they have all become beholden to this DEI culture
10:51
and it's everywhere I wrote about this for The Spectator this week and in the wake of that article
10:55
I had a message from a friend of mine who works in recruitment
10:59
and he said, James, you wouldn't believe you wouldn't believe the extent to which this DEI culture
11:05
has taken over in the recruitment practices of many, many top firms
11:08
and he gave a few examples of things that really, really irritate him
11:12
He said, first of all, it's just how patronising it is towards diverse candidates
11:18
A lot of these recruiters now who are thinking in a DEI mindset are so patronising He gave one example of where people with neurodivergence are being referred to in some cases literally in the job applications as superheroes with superpowers
11:34
How patronising. Someone's got, I don't know, ADHD or autism and you're referring to them as a super..
11:40
I mean, they're not Spider-Man, they've got autism. I mean, why are we using such infantile patronising language
11:47
We're doing them a massive disservice. He talked about employment lawyers being too afraid to explain to DEI bosses that some of their recruitment practices are probably illegal, probably go beyond positive action and actually break the law and become discriminatory
12:02
He talks about people having recruitment targets for diverse candidates that bear no resemblance to the wider population
12:08
For example, a target to hire a certain percentage of BAME, black and minority ethnic candidates, even if it far exceeds the percentage of the population who are actually BAME
12:17
And I just think we need to explore to what extent this is actually being counterproductive
12:23
Who does this help? Who does this help? No one. It helps no one
12:29
It doesn't help diverse candidates because they are then being left open to the stigma that they might have not ended up where they are through merit
12:39
They might have only got there through special treatment. So it's unfair on them
12:43
it's unfair on people who lose out otherwise and i just think it is dripping with a kind of racism
12:52
of its own it is that soft bigotry of low expectations no wonder you now have senior
12:58
academics at cambridge circulating a letter demanding an independent inquiry into our day's
13:03
appointment they say the university wanted a quick fix to improve the diversity of its staff
13:08
and they're right. Cambridge University cannot just sweep this under the carpet
13:14
They need to come out and explain themselves. Forget about Jason Ardane. He is on one level, yes, he's brought this on himself
13:21
but on one level he's a victim here. He gave the likes of Cambridge University everything they wanted
13:26
because there's a type of sappy liberal who looked at Jason Ardane
13:32
and saw everything they wanted to believe about the world and themselves
13:37
and they kind of exploited him. And the University, Jesus College, Cambridge
13:43
sort of exploited him. Hilary Kremin, the head of the education faculty
13:48
kind of exploited him. And we need to be hearing from them. They need to be apologising
13:53
They need to be explaining themselves. Potentially they need to be resigning because this is outrageous
13:58
Sue Key messages to say, James, you're an idiot, beating the drum about DEI
14:02
OK, you have the odd example of where it goes wrong, but have you ever experienced a number of white hires
14:08
who are completely and utterly incompetent but got promoted anyway? I'll give you two examples, Liz Truss and Boris Johnson
14:14
Well, of course, Suki, no one is disputing that incompetence is evenly spread
14:18
and there are many incompetent white people and you give two examples that in your view qualify for it
14:23
The point is Boris Johnson and Liz Truss did not become Prime Minister
14:26
because they were white. Jason Arday, realistically, do we think he would have been appointed
14:31
to a university professorship at Cambridge if he was not a black man who was studying critical race theory, etc
14:39
at a time in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement where universities were trying to become more inclusive
14:44
That is the problem. And clearly they lowered their standards for him
14:48
They did no due diligence. I mean, the most generous interpretation is that they just completely dropped the ball on their academic standards
14:58
didn't check, didn't validate his PhD, He didn't actually make sure it wasn't plagiarised
15:03
And the worst interpretation is they simply didn't care. They looked the other way
15:07
Maybe they suspected he was a fabulist. You know, he was making stuff up about his own life
15:12
and potentially had plagiarised his PhD, but thought, doesn't care, he'll make us look good
15:17
They saw him like a kind of mascot, which is so patronising, so offensive
15:23
I just, honestly, the more I've learned about this story, the angrier I've gotten
15:28
I wonder what you think the answers need to be. Marcia is in Harlesden. Good morning Marcia, what would you like to say
16:01
advertised. That doesn't excuse what, I mean, it sounds like this guy was an absolute fantasist
16:06
but the idea that you can say that anybody that isn't, what, male and white was only hired
16:12
through DEI. No, I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that. Well, that's what I heard, because the reality is that people up and down the country get
16:21
jobs through all sorts of means, especially now with AI. It's so difficult to get a job
16:25
People are trying everything they possibly can in order to find out and put themselves
16:30
in the best position and they do what they can. This guy, yes, he does sound like a fantasist
16:34
but I think that you're using what is clearly, I mean, apparently he's autistic
16:38
and there's all sorts of stuff, that there is a difference between someone getting hired
16:42
and finding out that that person was, you know, was clearly lying about their background
16:47
and trying to slur three single, what, person that isn't white and male that's got a job
16:54
No, I'm making the exact opposite point, Marcia, which is the problem is stories like this fail the i mean if we want to use academia as an example
17:03
and no there aren enough black academics currently but there are many outstanding ones and those outstanding black academics have been failed by this story and by the fact that jason arday was appointed because there will be people looking at
17:15
them now with the suspicion of well were they just diversity hires when they almost certainly weren't
17:20
they were there on merit that those people looking at them are showing exactly the kind of racism that
17:25
we should fight against how about looking at him as a human being how about saying we have a human
17:30
being that was hired and clearly is a fantasist why does it have to be about the color of his skin
17:35
or his race because because because would he have been appointed would he not would he have been
17:40
appointed to cambridge at the age of 37 as a professor i mean his only do you know what his
17:46
actual um university degree was in it was in pe the guy's a pe teacher and he was appointed as a
17:53
university professor at cambridge because he had concocted this remarkable life story
17:59
had allegedly plagiarised a PhD and he was focusing on issues that were kind of hot-button issues at the time
18:05
This was the wake of the BLM movement, whatever. And universities, understandably, were trying to increase their diversity
18:10
but not in this way. I mean, this guy was a DEI hire
18:15
I'd be amazed. If their recruitment process was so slack that they were able to recruit somebody
18:22
who wasn't qualified to do the job, I would be amazed if he was, A, the only one
18:26
and B, it only related to someone's colour of their skin. But do you think Jason Arday would have been hired if he was white
18:33
Plenty of people hired and are white and not qualified to do their job. That's a different question
18:37
Do you think Jason Arday, if he was white, would have been hired? Don't you assume that he would have been, yes
18:44
They still have to rely. You have to go to an interview, an application process
18:48
They should be proper vetting. It's not easy to get these jobs. I mean, you know, I think what would be more helpful
18:55
is to look at what the recruitment process was put in place
18:59
in order to check this person's qualifications. Presumably, he had to have appraisals and things
19:06
to show whether he was delivering against the job he was actually in. You don't just get the job and they leave you for years
19:11
So there's a whole process around this. And I just think it's kind of lazy to make an assumption of this stuff
19:17
I think it's better to understand what is the process that lawyers have in place to recruit
19:24
Well, do we need DEI departments? Do we need DEI departments in big organisations, in the public sector
19:32
Because surely, look, anti-discrimination laws, of course we need. Of course we need anti-discrimination laws
19:38
You know, if you say that you're not hiring someone because of their skin colour, that is racist, that should be illegal, it is illegal
19:44
But isn't the problem with DEI, it is a form of positive discrimination
19:49
You've had some employees, BBC, for example, they have in the past advertised schemes and roles where only non-white candidates can apply
19:57
now for me that is racism what um what they've been doing and what the attempts to do is to
20:06
address um systemic inequalities are built into systems so what it looks at is it says things like
20:14
okay why is it for example um that i don't know we're not we're not getting any women applying to
20:20
these particular jobs. We have bias baited into our system and that we found out that
20:27
you know, we're not advertising fairly. We're not advertising across lots of different types
20:32
of channels. Perhaps the only people we promote in these jobs are from a certain background
20:37
and therefore other people don't feel it's a job that they could apply for. People still need the qualifications. People still need to meet the job criteria
20:46
Well, Jason Arday clearly didn't. I think that's why it's so offensive
20:50
because I think that the idea that the job description wouldn't apply to you
20:56
because of the colour of your skin is deeply offensive Well I don't think it did in Jason Arday's case, did it
21:02
It's just not true So it's very easy to take one example
21:05
He is an extreme example, of course which is why it's made the headlines because it's such an outrageous case
21:10
but I do wonder whether it speaks to something broader I think somebody said before, didn't they, about Liz Trust
21:17
But let's use a more modern example, which is Trump. You know, the idea that every single leader that we see across the world
21:26
is the best person for that job. They are the most qualified. There will always be incompetent people
21:31
There will always be people who are not up to speed. Yeah, but what you're not doing is using that as an example
21:36
I mean, imagine if you were to say that Trump was somehow the poster child
21:41
for not allowing any white American male in that position of power
21:46
No, but Marcia, Marcia, you are absolutely twisting my argument. No, you're implying that I'm saying that because Jason Arday
21:53
shouldn't have been a professor, that no black academic should be appointed
21:57
which is obviously not what I'm saying. You said no DEI. Yeah, because why..
22:01
It's a DEI. Do you not agree, Marcia? And the two are not the same. Do you not agree, Marcia
22:06
The talent is evenly distributed. There are just as many highly capable black people
22:10
as there are white people. And if we get out of the way, if there's no discrimination, if we provide a level playing field
22:14
then everyone should be able to achieve on merit. And that is exactly what DEI attempts to do
22:21
to level that playing field. That is exactly the purpose. So why do many employers have quotas for diverse candidates
22:27
that exceed, for example, the population proportion? Because you don't understand what the problem is
22:32
if you don't count it. So how do you know that there's an issue if you don't answer questions to see if there's an issue
22:38
That's the only reason for it, you need the data. And once you have the data
22:42
you can understand if there is a problem. And, you know, if there's no problem, your DEI will not be putting in artificial, arbitrary things to solve something
22:51
It's only there if an issue is found
#news


