Up next in 10
POSCO, Sabarimala, Labour Law & Juvenile Justice Explained by Justice Nitin R. Borkar, Bombay HC.
Nov 30, 2025
Justice Nitin R. Borkar delivered an inspiring and deeply insightful address to the First Year LLB (3-Year) students of Siddharth College of Law, Mumbai on 29 November, as part of the Constitution Day celebrations.
In this powerful session, he explained:
🟦 POSCO Act — its purpose, strengths, and challenges
🟦 Sabarimala Judgment — constitutional morality vs. essential practices
🟦 New Labour Laws / Labour Codes — key reforms and impact
🟦 Juvenile Justice — the balance between reform and public safety
This address offered students a rare opportunity to understand the judiciary’s perspective on India’s evolving legal landscape.
📌 Date of Address: 29 November (not 26 November)
📌 Venue: Siddharth College of Law, Mumbai
📌 Audience: FY LLB – 3 Year course
#JusticeNitinRBorkar #ConstitutionDay #SiddharthCollegeOfLaw #POSCO #SabarimalaCase #LabourLaws #JuvenileJustice #LLBStudents #LegalEducation #Mumbai
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
But I don't think that I could give a formal speech here because I mean the
0:06
students are from other which year but they first year second year.
0:12
So there are three years course or five years three years course. Okay. Okay. So
0:18
instead of telling it again telling you what happened in Gulak and what happened in awar
0:27
and now I mean age of this internet and digital era you know everything so I I
0:35
don't I don't want to give a formal speech that may not be a desirable
0:41
looking to the so otherwise also I prefer interacting with the student that
0:46
is better because telling you something that is reading a speech may not be
0:53
not you may not have said that may not create some sort of interest in you. So
1:01
Mr. because of I am in a judiciary so we have to hold a workshops and whenever I
1:07
go for a workshop and other judicial officers I ask questions to them and
1:14
same same will I do with with all of you. So you have to you have to answer you can ask any questions if there is
1:21
some some language is no bad you can ask in any any any language. So
1:30
so now who will start asking question that what first question I will ask you
1:37
and then you can ask other questions. Now we are ready.
1:43
We are we are ready. Now what do you understand by justice or
1:48
what do you mean by justice? [Music]
1:57
Okay. Okay. All right. So
2:03
please please please tell me what do you understand by justice or what do you mean by justice? So will tell me the
2:11
first year student could tell me what what is justice. Anybody
2:17
raise your hands and answer please. And stand up. And stand up and answer.
2:22
Yes. Anybody? No one. Yeah.
2:28
Justice for me needs to get relief from any wrongdoing or any suffering that I had from anyone.
2:35
Okay. from boys.
2:44
People are treated say no favorism. That is called justice. That that is
2:50
all the justice. There should be no favorism. All are equal. No favorism. That that is justice.
2:56
Okay.
3:02
If I if I say bring the peace in society is a justice
3:10
from my side bring peace in a society that is a justice.
3:17
[Music] If I if I say that whatever whatever the
3:25
court decides in accordance with law will not be a justice according to you or will that be a justice according to
3:31
the constitution mean justice refer to as a judiciary that the
3:39
court so will it be a justice only I mean
3:46
justice is restricted to judiciary only. No. Huh?
3:52
Jud, it is not restricted to judiciary. After that, if a judiciary decides
3:58
something some in some accordance with some law, then it will it be a justice
4:03
only or there is something else which become called justice.
4:09
[Music] All right. Your faculty wants to answer.
4:16
Sir in our everyday life we are into a lot of interactions and it is our duty
4:23
ethical you can say or the moral duty that we do the right and I think when
4:28
each one is conscious enough and does the right I think no wrong is done and I
4:33
think because of that each one is serving justice at their own level I believe that the grassroot of justice is
4:39
a society per
4:46
[Music] will go by one by one because
4:53
now why there is no
4:59
constitution you have anybody's aware about article 142
5:06
anybody article 142 The students
5:14
article 142. Have you read about article 142?
5:23
[Music]
5:28
I will tell you what article 41 142. The article 142 the
5:35
empower the supreme court to do complete justice.
5:41
So why that article is there in the constitution? This why that article is
5:48
this that 142 article is there to do complete
5:53
justice. This is there any need of ultimately the court decides in accordance with law. If there is a law
6:01
if there is a there is a right there is a remedy. If the right is violated, you have an amenity to approach the court
6:06
and that right you can assert before the court and the court decides whether you were entitled to relief on the basis of
6:13
that right. Then still why that article 142 is there where in what situation
6:19
that article 142 operates if the court decides on the basis of
6:27
miss from district district judiciary to high court high court doesn't have that
6:33
power of matter to do as well there is no article which I empower the high
6:39
court to do complete justice it's only it's only supreme court under article
6:45
42. Why that what was the need of that?
6:51
Then the final final binary justice which is provided which cannot be. So even if injustice is
6:59
provided in the lower
7:05
[Music] that has the power.
7:10
Yeah. Can you visualize? Can you visualize any situation where
7:16
you feel that oh that this is no law is like this or there is no law but still
7:23
injustice is cost to him and that's that is to be remeded. Can you sit?
7:34
There is a guidelines provided by the Supreme Court itself. because of the cause that the lower court do not have
7:41
that ambit in such a way. So supreme power
7:50
between
7:57
people is really a good man because of that
8:04
woman empowerment and seeing as a woman where nowadays two women's are coming up
8:10
as an employer very famous in history you can see women's are not really that kind of
8:15
right because there was no legislation in relation to this harassment at
8:20
workplace and then after timeline you know this has come from
8:26
there there are situations where the
8:31
there are really a unique provided in your constitution unique providence but sometimes
8:41
sometimes While
8:47
serving as a judge, we do feel that oh there is the law against him but we do
8:54
feel that some injustice have been done to the person concerned that needs to be
8:59
reed. It is not that what what we do in accordance with law is the only justice
9:06
or just because some law is like this and therefore we have to go by that there can be a situations where we feel
9:14
that no law is but still
9:21
this is some some [Music]
9:31
And I would just like to say a few words about this that about the point that he
9:36
has discussed that sometimes the law does not define it but the essence is added by the judge and this you will
9:43
usually see in every day you know time in courtroom number 27 wherein you see
9:51
the bill applications and the applications [Applause]
9:56
I'm very thankful
10:01
So even NCD
10:07
ask questions guys. So even the case of Mumba versus even the class where his MCD
10:15
or municipal corporation of Delhi the child got hurt and the compensation was given. Please
10:22
take his microphone. [Music]
10:33
I'm audible. Yes. Yeah. Even the case of Luna versus MCD where uh compensation was given to child
10:40
uh that case. So the justice was fairly given in that case. Uh if you could
10:46
shine a light on that. What is your question?
10:52
Uh so the I would like to know more about that case like how the justice gets
10:58
defined in that and also there's another case where policeman uh was executed
11:05
uh very specific
11:14
that something happened in due to negligence the word was and in
11:21
that judgment was provided in the compensation. It's 2022 case
11:27
study. But once you make sure you are asking
11:32
something with his landmark judgment which he will be able to not the specific ones
11:39
you can tell from your end some specific cases where he will tell whether the judgment was given was correct but
11:45
according to his perspective but not the one which are not the land cases. Now, now we are we have a very
11:54
what what do you think about Sabriala? Are you aware about Sabria? Yes sir.
12:00
You are aware about something. Okay. What do you think about that? We
12:06
are in a college so we can discuss it. If you ask
12:12
it's a really discrimination some some student I answer this question
12:22
sir. Uh if we talk about that particular set [Music]
12:28
sorry I'm not if we talk about that particular case shabala case that woman's rights were
12:37
talked about but if we see on the other hand there is one temple in I think
12:44
Nepal site Kamak temple and assa
12:50
so I heard that in that particular during particular period of the year men
12:56
are not allowed. So why friends are not protesting for their rights and why women are
13:01
[Music]
13:08
[Music] Anybody
13:19
wants to answer this please?
13:26
Sir in the subdala case the case was of the exclusion of women. How can you say
13:33
exclusion of people is right in the temple and it was a specific age from 10
13:39
to 50 you're saying it's right because in another place in men were not
13:45
allowed so we us men to not stand up for the right no he's not justifying he's not saying
13:51
he said that we are also discriminated [Music] by which we have put forward
13:59
you saying that that is that that is the that is the correct judgment And that is what so why the people are so much
14:05
criticizing it even even with the local there are protesting against why that is
14:12
happening because where we are why why that is happening yes because it's going it's been going
14:19
on since centuries women are suppressed in century and now the aggression is coming up is what I feel not
14:32
that I think that depends on the upbringing of the family. Some families are very traditionally rooted, right? So
14:38
if you in if you grow up in a household where you're told that in you cannot
14:44
enter someone somewhere because of who you are. You cannot just
14:50
abandon those values that you have said that were right since a very small age.
14:57
Yes. Because they feel that non-religious
15:03
people or the state is in getting involved in their worship. Okay. Do you feel it's a diversity?
15:12
It's not a discrimination. It's a diversity.
15:25
[Music] Hello there is in judicial uh juvenile
15:33
act 2000 I wanted to ask one doubt sir jud act
15:39
2000 and there is a juvenile uh juvenile
15:44
act 2015 when in the repair case the boy 16 and
15:51
1/2 years of age he was uh uh was not
15:56
punished because of the uh it was of minor age below 8 but in 2015 it has the
16:04
law has been changed amendment has come so the provision was given he should be
16:11
dealt with the other person but during that s till today and till now he should
16:20
not be punished death punishment and as well as he should not be given increase life improvement. The two
16:26
points are so there that is my thoughts
16:40
problem is that even in a new act you want to try to as an adult
16:48
then you have to conduct inquiry with a present that age of 16 to 18 Yes, you
16:55
have to conduct inquiry and after conducting inquiry
17:01
it would comes to the conclusion that he was conscious of the fact that what he
17:06
was doing then only you can try him as an adder
17:12
otherwise he was not aware of the consequences of what he was doing that you can't buy him as an
17:19
so that is the now that that way the law law
17:25
So unless that inquiry is conducted, unless it's found that he was aware of a
17:30
consequences, unless that conclusion is reached, you
17:36
can't try him as a header and that it's ultimately it's all
17:44
beneficial legislation. We want to protect our children,
17:52
you know. Unless they are aware what they are doing is wrong, you can't punish them.
18:00
The whole whole intent of that legislation is to protect children. Sometimes is we come across Mr. We come
18:08
across so many cases where they are because they are this the crimes they commit
18:15
crime because of some compelling circumstances not because they want to commit that
18:22
crime. So that is the intent that is the intent
18:28
behind it. Now some unfortunate incidents like
18:36
But still because of that one solitary incident you can't just
18:42
change the law. So you have to think of your
18:48
is really conscious of what you are doing and still they have made provisions in if that group of 16 to 18
18:57
still you can [Music] therefore that
19:04
is yes
19:10
uh so the major concern these days in our country is the air quality. Huh?
19:17
The major concern in our country these days is the air quality index. So I feel the only transaction between a citizen
19:23
and government is we pay their taxes they give us services. So citizens are paying their taxes but the government
19:30
itself is unable to give quality water quality of air to the citizens. Then how
19:38
a justice can be served here and who to be punished? Now you take the example of Now you take
19:46
the example of Delhi.
19:52
The problem is somewhere else.
20:02
[Music] Supreme Court has banned the crackers
20:10
that are not but but the people are registered.
20:17
So they are plotting that order but also the jungles are being cut down in one in Hyderabad and the second one
20:23
is happening in Nashik. Right? The jungles are also being cut down. So the in Hyderabad there was one jungle
20:30
deforestation deforestation is also happening. Right? But who are responsible for this? We are
20:36
responsible for this. Uh sir but the deforestation which happened in Hyderabad it was a reserve
20:41
forest and it was then given to a to for the excavation of mining project and the
20:47
kumbal is happening in like few days I guess. So the deforestation will also happen in national so they're going to
20:53
cut down 1700 trees. So there there's a protest going on for that. There was a recent judgment by Supreme
20:59
Court that minings will not be allowed in Chand. So they have stopped that.
21:06
Yeah. But the damage is already done. No, the hyperbar is still not started
21:11
because of this. But excavation has been done there. Yes. People just had announced this order. That is why it's also stopped in.
21:19
I'm talking about in Hyderabadi. Yeah, Hyderabad didn't stop the protest. So it did stop it. It got
21:28
extent. Yeah. But if the damage is already done and the justice is being delayed,
21:34
so it is also an injustice, right?
21:44
You asking some question that exactly.
21:52
Sir, he needs to say that when the damages are done, there is a delay in justice.
22:00
To delay in justice of what he's saying. Uh in Hyderabad, so she's saying that
22:05
Supreme Court has given the order to stop the mining. Right. But in Hyderabad the trees were already cut down. So they
22:12
will not cut the trees now. But the there are many examples. There are many
22:18
examples like this. And sometimes we are we are depend for execution of the order we are dependent upon uh the executive
22:26
and the problem is sometimes they don't take it seriously. So you see what what is happening in a bulla justice case and
22:34
in spite of that orders and the all sorts of contempt petitions are
22:41
filed there. So this is all some sometimes we have place they say if if
22:49
executive executive says that we don't want to follow court's orders
22:55
then court is helpless
23:01
is helpless you can't do anything you don't have any judiciary doesn't have any mechanism to get its order come
23:08
executed the judiciary is dependent upon the Executive for all this and if executive
23:16
has still that mean after the orders are passed and still the executive is not
23:21
that serious in implementing those orders you can't help it you can't help it we have this system
23:30
we have this this system
23:40
what The non the content jurisdiction
23:50
not implemented or appreciate
24:00
will not get but you
24:09
whatever he has suffered. You can't just remade in that. But you may some some
24:15
way you may but this is this is the this is the
24:20
framework of we can't help it sometimes and then these are the recent recent
24:27
buller case really no law provides for action like this. No
24:34
law provides correction like this. But still they and and
24:42
one man commits that crime and the whole family suffers.
24:49
The whole family suffers. So we can't help sometimes we have our
24:56
own limitations that nothing can be done and some
25:03
questions are.
25:09
So just adding to what you were saying I mean it on 27th November the Supreme Court actually accepted the elevation
25:16
definition for Arai Hills also where 90 Yeah. So 100 m above 100 m they cannot
25:23
do mining but below 100 m they can and 90% of the Araali hills fall in the
25:28
below 100 m category and the elevation definition is accepted by the Supreme Court. So what's your view on that also?
25:36
Because I have not made that judgment. So I may not may not be like I will not be able to answer you
25:43
exactly. I matter of s that they can
25:50
they can reply to you.
25:55
So I read about that I have not read that. So I may not be I
26:01
may not be proper for me. Good morning sir. So few minutes back we
26:08
were discussing about justice and what I understand and what every time it it holds that that a due procedure
26:15
established by law is considered to be a justice. So in that sense justice is very much static in nature but as far as
26:21
the society is concerned we see it is very dynamic and continuously evolving. So in this in that context I would like
26:27
to ask so we can see the flourishing of adolescent love is there and at the very same time the existence of poss is
26:34
there. So the both come into conflict. So sir how do you interpret that? So would like to read know your comment on
26:40
that. [Music]
26:50
Now we don't have a due procedure. So your procedure established that that is the article by new procedure American
27:10
city civil court where the accused was charged for thiso
27:18
they were in love relationship Later on they got married
27:26
[Music] child.
27:33
The crime was conducted and
27:39
because that what maybe that girl was a very honest she said that yes
27:46
this whatever this has happened she reports according
27:56
the the court convicted that accuse for five years
28:02
because it wasn't technical office. She was below that age of 18 years
28:12
on the date on which that allegianc
28:30
[Music] before enacted
28:36
the in a in old 376 IPC
28:42
the age the age was 16 years
28:49
if she is above 16 and had a relations
28:54
where consensus under 376.
29:02
Now in a box case that is now very [Music]
29:11
many jetties are questioning this. There are many you know many many judgments
29:19
the court has observed that this is this is not life.
29:24
But the legislature in its wisdom has thought that we should have we should
29:32
We should not allow test before 18 [Music]
29:38
till that law is there. Nobody can
29:44
nobody can and I was really surprised when that man
29:50
was convicted. I was really surprised. They said 5 years 5 years is not a small punishment.
30:00
You are doing that entire family.
30:06
All relations were consensual. They were in no relationship.
30:12
They got married. It's not that for some for some reason at at that point of
30:17
time. But I will tell you it's not that some in every case the victim goes to the police station.
30:26
Yes, there are multiple cases wherein because of this consensual relationship
30:33
if becomes pregnant she's taken to the hospital the doctors ask her age if
30:39
she's below 18 years of age and the doctors the doctors
30:45
take that the police then police authorities
30:51
are informed about that and though victim is not willing to all report and
30:57
still because that is a that is an offense the crime is registered. [Music]
31:03
So this is the situation but we can't help it really the court can help it
31:09
when it comes to the code some way some some way out some sort of but still there are instances like the the person
31:16
who married to that a victim were blessed with child still sometimes this
31:22
that is surprising that uh five years punishment.
31:28
So till that law is there, we can't the judiciary, the court may help it
31:35
when it comes to the but if such instances are there then
31:44
difficult situation.
31:53
Sir, I would just like to add on on this point since we discussed in regards to primary powers under article number 142
31:59
of the constitution of India. uh back I think on 28th of October 2025
32:05
um there was a judgment delivered by justice wherein u it was a fox case and he was
32:13
been convicted for 10 years rigorous imprisonment and 5 years for 376 and 363
32:19
of the IPC. In uh paragraph number nine, there was an observation made where it
32:25
was being said that the crime arises out of the love and not the lust and
32:32
therefore considering the exceptional circumstances since the victim is having
32:38
a a peaceful marrial uh relation with the accused and is
32:45
having an 8mon old child and therefore so the conviction was push. I think that
32:52
was a very big achievement in this
32:58
judgment that may help but until ultimately problem is that the judgment will come when when it will come to the
33:04
court. The the the problem is that whenever either victim goes to the
33:11
police station, they have no option to register offense or whenever even if she doesn't go to
33:17
hospital because of this she's admitted for some reason admitted in a hospital and she discloses something then again
33:24
that so till this law is there.
33:34
Yeah. is that we are we are handless. Yes ma'am. So I have a question regarding this
33:41
itself. So what is your opinion on criminalizing marital rape? Because in today's law we don't have any definition
33:48
or anything which tells us the uh whole point of view or what the judiciary
33:54
thinks about marital. Oh it's a very debative question.
34:03
It's a very debatable question. Now the now because of all this now this
34:10
judgment of a personal liberty and integrity of body
34:15
and this this is this is but madam still
34:21
we are not reached to that stage to recognize marital and the problem and now you are you not
34:30
come this side the you see the 498 provision
34:35
is it's it's misused means rampantly and if you recognize this
34:43
498 you you know 498 of IPC that is a cruel cruelty or you can think as
34:52
common domestic violence we call it like so so that is rampantly misused if you
35:00
recognize the marital the whole we don't know what will
35:06
happen. We don't know what will happen whether it will create some sort of
35:12
otherwise also this mar this this marriage is now it's
35:21
so after few days I don't it will be avail Hey,
35:28
[Music]
35:36
since I'm practicing family law as well, um there is this there are many cases in
35:41
regards to adultery as the respondent is in order. We have Joseph Shine's case uh
35:49
which has been a landmark for most of the population where section 497 was
35:54
decriminalized. So do you I would request if you can share your opinion in regards to that case law
36:01
because somewhere I feel the agreed spouse has nowhere to go. I also feel
36:07
that since uh the criminal clause have you know just become too weak or we can
36:13
say that the act of adultery does not have sufficient to bring justice to the
36:18
person. When it has turned into a civil ground for divorce, sir, it is very
36:23
difficult to prove. That's number one because we don't have cops help us.
36:28
Number two, when the agreed spouse goes around, you know, finding the private detective that then another petition
36:36
comes up that there is there's a breach of you know so what is your call on such
36:41
situation? Because now agreed is getting more agree. Apart from that if I see I had done one uh primary evidence survey
36:48
in regards to what had been the impact where adul was involved in the spouse.
36:54
The children of that family have actually got involved themselves into
37:00
substance abuse and not only that they have also uh there were instances of uh
37:06
mental trauma, depression and identity crisis. Sir in that line sir can you
37:12
please share your view in regards to choosing Chinese case
37:18
but now you have a we can't do anything if it is
37:27
and it's really difficult to prove adult even if you go and a wise complaint for
37:34
this offense still it was the judgments are there I'm not tell you Mr. to what
37:40
extent the court has gone through the the proof which is required for proving
37:46
this really so now we have a judgment we can't say
37:53
may not be proper for saying something still you have a ground
37:58
as you said that that is
38:07
you also share some this is that they say that
38:15
some some sort of industries is done by
38:25
so I have one [Music]
38:36
labor [Music]
38:47
Central government. [Music]
39:02
Labor law. [Music]
39:09
fortune.
39:32
[Music] for
39:44
[Music]
39:52
[Music]
39:59
Netherland. Don't think [Music]
40:09
[Music]
40:19
[Music] back toward
40:24
[Music]
40:39
[Music]
40:51
acept. [Music]
40:59
[Music]
41:09
[Music]
41:17
What is [Music] Forever.
41:25
[Music] [Applause] [Music]
41:43
[Applause] [Music]
41:51
Labor, special travelers. [Music]
42:04
[Music]
42:16
[Music]
42:24
benefit. [Music]
42:35
[Music]
42:42
[Music] Yeah.
43:00
[Music] Prospective. [Music]
43:07
Avoid [Music]
43:21
[Music]
43:30
[Music]
43:36
[Music] Sir having respect with just retired
43:44
as deliver justice regarding the reservation in reservation some category
43:51
204 in August and just before retirement
43:56
he mentioned about the atro city
44:02
justice he mention I heard about newspap uh regarding the bill in atrocity in
44:10
Maharashtra her atrocity case was there and uh what 1989 atrocity act is passed
44:20
already but uh rate is also very low and
44:26
uh I'm mixing one another social issue regation regation
44:32
five this is civil was bridge was there. Our chief justice also there but during
44:40
delivering justice order our honorable sir uh crimly
44:50
billion but we are social fighting for social cause and uh he of so many
44:58
socials. He himself during that his schedule he came first time in Mumbai
45:04
protocol was not maintained and uh srowing issue was there so uh whatever I
45:15
discussing if you please focus on that you
45:27
I will not answer
45:32
The problem is that subclassification judgment justice has also said that
45:40
this gentleman was criticized by people from his own community.
45:48
But my if I ask my personal my personal view is about
45:56
that judgment is what that is
46:01
we have to understand the intent behind reservation.
46:09
If the situation went this thing that is
46:15
this concept of reservation was introduced in constitution
46:24
certain cast or tribe
46:29
treat them in a mainstream.
46:34
Now, now what is happening because because of
46:41
now from a particular category, Justice Davi has also said that if a son
46:48
of says that I need reservation.
46:58
So that may not be right because
47:07
because you and now you don't need you can compete with that other other
47:12
general category students or you can't compete in employment or with with other
47:17
others at that time we were not because of the social backgrounds are you discriminated
47:27
we are not you were not getting good education. You are not allow you were
47:32
not allowed what in the schools and in that situation that concept of
47:38
preservation was there and now if you after after everything you have now and still you say that
47:46
no I still want that suppose now I'm I'm a high court judge I'm saying that I
47:52
will for my son I want reservation
47:57
who goes to the good school who has every facility
48:03
And still if I say that the and it's not a sub state that the
48:10
judgment has put some rider it's not that absolute judgment that you can do
48:15
it. It says that you you identify the cost you identify the cost within a
48:21
schedule class or schedule trial who are still not benefited by this
48:29
reservations. They have not said that you do it that blindly. There are certain cast still
48:37
there are certain cast you know within a schedule cast or schedule track. They are still backward. They are still
48:43
backward. So the the intent was to bring the that
48:50
those class and that category in a main state. You see what happens in the case
48:57
in in a scheduled tribe if you see this medical admissions you don't get candidates or students
49:04
from a schedule drive category still you don't get and what what is happening because of that those who are not a
49:11
scheduleled tribe lot lots of petitions are file this
49:18
where wherein the cast validities when this cast is invalidated
49:24
class certificate is invalidated of the schedule candidate and they come they come to the court oh now I have
49:30
completed my MBBS course now I have I have put in this much of service so
49:37
please protect me earlier that was done and the court has protected the services
49:42
of lot many saying that now there's no one if if his cast is inated and he's
49:48
not allowed to practice now that ultimately the state has invest
49:55
So not many cases are there. So in my personal view that now we have because
50:01
of that benefit of that reservation or some now we have achieved that position
50:06
that your sons can compete with others. [Music]
50:11
It's not that now maybe still we have not come to that state but there still
50:17
but still that it's not now open that is not but there no no school can deny you
50:24
deny you admission on the ground that you belongs to this category or you belong to this
50:30
and if you can if you if your son is taking education in a good school if
50:36
your son is having all facilities which are that in That context that judgment is
50:42
delivered and it says that oh those those cast who are there in the schedule
50:47
cast and schedule time they have not they they are they are not want benefit
50:54
of this this reservation they they still need this. So instead of giving giving
50:59
this benefit to the those cast who are now come in a main street please give them those that that reservation so that
51:06
they can also come come in a main street. that is sent behind that behind that as I said. So
51:15
that is the s before justice
51:23
to give justice some analysis or evidence from there on that evidences
51:30
justice will be delivered but senses
51:36
which cast remaining behind which cast service proper service should be
51:42
Government of India, government of India is there
51:51
on identifying that you have done only you can do it that
51:58
already started already
52:05
without any they do it. I can't do it without
52:18
saying personal view that was really seriously criticized
52:24
that person behind it might be just to stop you there and this thing needs to
52:29
be highlighted from here. If he has correctly said that those who have got the reservation next generation should
52:37
not get it. Is it right said? No reservation
52:46
coming. [Music]
52:52
He has mentioned only but suppose one generation is a judge. Suppose I judge
53:00
my son is not a good study and I'm retired. I'm getting very personable
53:11
but he has got actually familiar concept of sess
53:18
[Music]
53:25
and in that they were mentioned about 60 that was more than 30 or 30
53:33
In that case they mix
53:39
SCS propos because the circumstances were different
53:45
on that so you can't mix but your concept if you areating
53:54
for also society for legis
54:00
Modi has cleared to him and ask about the
54:08
not judgment only he made remarks remarks judgment is different but
54:15
so many went to prime minister and he judgment is okay but here we will not be
54:22
here but people are doing
54:27
this judgment and they bring anti-retation policy and all the things that's why uh
54:37
the judgment at about retirement about
54:44
some news I had but justice judgment I don't care
54:51
should not be given will not be provided Whatever.
54:58
This one [Music]
55:05
actually [Music]
55:17
[Laughter] for
55:24
[Music]
55:30
[Music] [Laughter]
55:37
generation. [Music]
55:46
[Music]
55:51
going on. [Music]
56:00
One last question for the day. Yeah. Yeah. Question now.
56:07
Uh good morning just wanted to highlight before going to the question that Supreme Court recently highlighted that
56:14
the person practicing law should be smiling and uh should be should have a good sense of humor and since morning
56:21
you know the the session started I have been observing that you know you have been quietly and with a very smiling
56:27
face so that's a very good reminder for all of us that being a hyper you've been
56:34
hitting your inside very smiling Yes, thank you for that. And coming to the question, uh you said that justice the
56:42
chief justice of India actually gave the judgment for the justice and I guess that was the reaction that he was he
56:50
encountered because I read the articles. Uh so I just wanted to ask you know when
56:56
you pass judgments like this you know which has a larger implications. So do you take the opinion of a large group of
57:03
you know public what is the social media buzz like you know the trend is like you know there is we are in 25 and everyone
57:11
has a opinion and the opinion is very strong they have their own uh
57:18
like you know reasoning behind it. So you as a judger you you know do you take
57:24
into account the opinion of the larger public [Music]
57:29
society of society.
57:35
So you can't judgements without taking that divorce opinion of society.
57:42
Judiciary exist for society. Judiciary exist for people. They don't pass
57:48
judgment for themselves. they deliver for the people.
57:54
So social media
58:01
you can't ignore society or society.
58:07
[Music] No,
58:14
if it's a society's interest, you don't have to think of consequences.
58:20
Think of consequences what will happen if it's interest
58:43
[Music]
58:50
[Music]
58:59
[Music]
59:12
[Music] We have our own limitations.
59:18
We have our own limitations. Yes. And just because we are judge and some
59:23
powers are conferred upon us, we can't do this. We have our own limitations.
59:30
So listen, I don't know who has this
59:38
glad to know about this. But it's not bad. It's not bad. You have
59:46
various compulsions. Sometimes
59:53
some sometimes you have to take while decide while by
59:58
while by while delivering that while deciding some parts
1:00:04
to take what considerations it's not balance.
1:00:12
school. We have our own limitations.
1:00:23
Thank you.
#Crime & Justice
#Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
#Labor & Employment Law