Do you think there is a difference between "high" and "low" art? - IELTS Speaking Part 3

Answer: Yes, I think that there is a difference between "high" and "low" art, but the distinction is subjective and often controversial. Reason: The distinction between "high" and "low" art is based on a hierarchy of cultural values and aesthetic standards that reflects social, economic, and political power relations. "High" art is typically associated with elite, institutional, and traditional forms of art, such as painting, sculpture, and classical music, while "low" art is associated with popular, mass-produced, and commercial forms of art, such as street art, graffiti, and pop music. Example: For instance, some art critics and scholars may consider the works of Leonardo da Vinci or Rembrandt to be "high" art, while the works of Banksy or Andy Warhol to be "low" art. Alternative: However, the distinction between "high" and "low" art is also challenged by postmodern and contemporary art movements that embrace diversity, hybridity, and subversion. These movements question the authority and authenticity of art and challenge the established boundaries between "high" and "low" art.