Open.Video Logo

Open.Video

Why Everyone Should Use An Open YouTube Alternative

Tyler Bishop
•

Creators often don’t realize how much they’re losing just by being on YouTube or TikTok. These platforms act as intermediaries between creator and audience, taking huge percentages of ad revenue:

open video youtube alternative

Why Everyone Should Use An Open YouTube Alternative

The creator economy is booming, but the platforms controlling it are failing creators. YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook have built massive empires by monetizing creator content, yet most creators earn little, lose ownership of their audiences, and are forced to play by opaque algorithmic rules.

This has left creators asking a critical question: what is the best YouTube alternative?

The answer isn’t just another closed platform—it’s an open YouTube alternative where creators own their channels, keep their revenue, and decide how they interact with their audiences. That’s the vision of Open.Video, and it may be the most important shift in the future of online video.

The Hidden Cost of Closed Platforms

Creators often don’t realize how much they’re losing just by being on YouTube or TikTok. These platforms act as intermediaries between creator and audience, taking huge percentages of ad revenue:

  • YouTube’s 55/45 split: YouTube keeps 45% of ad revenue, creators only get 55%.
  • TikTok’s Creator Fund payouts: Around $0.02–$0.04 per 1,000 views (a million views can equal just $20–$40).
  • Meta’s abandoned bonus programs: Instagram and Facebook offered temporary payouts, but shut them down in 2023.

    • The math is grim:

  • A creator with 1.4 million monthly views (top 3% of YouTube) may earn less than $17,000 per year—barely above poverty level.
  • 96% of creators on YouTube earn below the U.S. poverty line from ad revenue.
  • TikTok creators report even worse results, with viral videos generating pocket change.

    • Meanwhile, platforms like YouTube report billions in annual ad revenue. Their shareholders profit, but creators—the ones actually producing the content—get crumbs.

    This imbalance shows why creators should be searching for an open YouTube alternative.

    Algorithmic Gatekeeping

    Revenue is only part of the problem. Closed platforms also control visibility through algorithms:

  • Algorithms decide which content is promoted and which is buried.
  • Success depends not on audience loyalty but on guessing what the algorithm wants.
  • Creators are pressured to churn out clickbait and follow trends instead of innovating.

    • This results in:

  • Homogenized culture — a flood of the same type of content designed to “hack” the algorithm.
  • Suppression of creativity — niche, experimental, or independent content rarely finds visibility.
  • Censorship through demonetization — creators lose revenue or get banned overnight, often without clear explanation.

    • “Algospeak”—terms like unalive instead of dead—exists solely because creators fear algorithmic censorship.

    The cultural cost is clear: the platforms shape not just how creators earn but what creators make.

    Why an Open YouTube Alternative Is the Future

    Open.Video flips the model. Instead of being a tenant on someone else’s platform, you own your channel, your audience, and your earnings.

    1. 100% Revenue Belongs to the Creator

    With Open.Video, there is no 45% cut, no disappearing Creator Fund, no arbitrary rules on what counts as monetizable. Whether you sell premium subscriptions, collect fan donations, or run your own sponsorships, every dollar goes straight to you. This isn’t just fairer—it’s sustainable.

    2. Creator Sovereignty

    On YouTube, your channel exists at Google’s discretion. One policy shift can delete years of work.

    With an open YouTube alternative like Open.Video:

  • Your videos live on your own domain.
  • You set your own content policies.
  • You cannot be “deplatformed” by one company.

    • This sovereignty means creators finally have control over their careers.

    3. Cultural Pluralism

    Instead of one central algorithm dictating culture, Open.Video creates a federated ecosystem:

  • Independent creators can host their own channels while still being part of a larger discovery network.
  • Different communities set their own moderation rules.
  • Controversial, niche, or experimental content can thrive where it’s welcome.

    • 4. Decentralized Discovery

    In a federated video ecosystem, discovery isn’t limited to YouTube’s recommendation engine. Viewers can:

  • Subscribe directly to creators
  • Use third-party apps for aggregation
  • Explore content via community-curated hubs

    • This creates room for innovation in video discovery and distribution—something YouTube has intentionally suppressed to maintain control.

    5. Resilience & Security

    Creators on closed platforms are one strike away from losing everything.

    In an open system:

  • If one host shuts down, you migrate and keep your audience.
  • Your community data is yours to keep, not locked away in YouTube’s backend.
  • Creators are treated as independent media entities, not disposable “content suppliers.”

    • This resilience makes Open.Video the only real long-term YouTube alternative.

    The Bigger Picture: Why the World Needs Open.Video

    The shift toward an open YouTube alternative isn’t just about money. It’s about the future of culture, independence, and freedom online.

  • Economic fairness: Creators deserve sustainable earnings.
  • Creative freedom: Algorithms shouldn’t dictate what people make.
  • Cultural diversity: Decentralization fosters variety instead of homogenization.
  • Free expression: No single corporation should decide the boundaries of global speech.

    • Just as open-source software transformed technology, Open.Video can transform digital media.

    Why Every YouTube Creator Should Care

    If you’re a creator on YouTube today, you’re renting space in a walled garden. Your career depends on:

  • Algorithm shifts
  • Policy changes
  • Whether your content is “brand safe”

    • But audiences don’t belong to YouTube—they belong to you. And if you’re serious about building a future-proof career, you should already be looking for an open YouTube alternative.

    Open.Video offers exactly that: independence, sovereignty, and fairness.

    Creator Interests Come First, Thats Open Video

    We are at a crossroads. One path is the status quo: creators trapped in closed platforms, fighting for visibility, and losing nearly half of their revenue. The other path is an open future—where creators control their platforms, own their communities, and thrive independently.

    The world doesn’t just need another YouTube alternative. It needs an open YouTube alternative.

    Open.Video represents that future. It’s not anti-YouTube—it’s pro-creator. It’s the evolution of online video, where freedom and independence replace dependency and control.

    For creators, this is the chance to finally own your career. For audiences, it’s the chance to enjoy a richer, freer media landscape.

    The creator economy can only be sustainable if it’s truly of the creators. And that means opening video.

    About Tyler Bishop

    Tyler a former start-up founder, Business Journal 30-under-30 recipient, and media technology industry executive.