Up next in 10
Answering The Muslim Critic Part 2 : Is The Bible Corrupted?
15 views
Feb 19, 2025
To Support tayibs.com , see link below https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=W7946Z6TXXRRC or visit https://tayibs.com/about-me/ To view the work of a Scribe, see link below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6IGj42UX_Y A few days ago I addressed one of the objection I received from a Muslim critic who sent me a barrage of questions, assaulting the credibility of the Bible. I told him that I was going to answer his objections one at a time, and today I’m dealing with part 2. Here is what he said “The Bible & the Torah express originally in Hebrew with Aramaic in some parts. Quran express originally in Arabic. Can translation of the word of God be taken as word of God? Translation is the work of man. The fact that there are so many translations & revised edition of the Bible but Quran only in one language (Arabic). English itself indicate that translations is subject to human errors. Now let us frankly ask ourselves. What is the source Book of our beliefs system? The original word from God or word has been translated, revised numerous times? If the latter is the reality than it is also a reality that translations are opened to flaws. Logical and truthful please. Basically he is arguing that since the Bible has been translated so many times in different languages over the course of many years, then it can no longer be trusted as the word of God. So I’ll be addressing this today
View Video Transcript
0:00
hello good morning this is ts.com if you
0:03
standing on my screen right now you're
0:04
going to read answering the Muslim
0:06
critic part two is the Bible corrupted
0:09
so a week and some change ago I shared a
0:12
post on my uh Channel and I talked about
0:14
why as people we can't see God with our
0:17
eyes and I gave the reasons why and this
0:20
guy uh sent me a barrage of questions
0:22
and actually he was assaulting the
0:24
Integrity of scriptures saying that the
0:26
Bible was not the word of God and he
0:28
gave me a lot of objections so I told
0:30
him I'm going to answer your objections
0:32
one at a time and the first one that I
0:34
did was um he questioned the genealogy
0:37
of Jesus he said that Matthew and Luke
0:39
had different account and there was a
0:41
contradiction so therefore that was not
0:43
the word of God so I address that in my
0:46
first uh video so if you want to see it
0:48
I will have a link for you in the
0:49
description and today I'm going to talk
0:52
about another thing he said the Bible is
0:54
corrupted because there are so many
0:56
translations and um he said for example
1:00
here's what here's what he wrote like he
1:02
said to me the Bible and the Torah
1:04
Express originally in Hebrew with
1:06
Aramaic in some portions and Quran
1:09
expressed originally in Arabic can
1:11
translation of the word of God be taken
1:13
as the word of God translation is the
1:15
work of man the fact that there are so
1:17
many translations and revised edition of
1:19
The Bible but Quran only in one language
1:22
Arabic English itself s indicate that
1:25
translations is subject to human errors
1:28
now let us frankly ask ourselves what is
1:30
the Source book of our belief system the
1:32
original word from God or word that has
1:34
been translated revised numerous times
1:37
if the latter is the reality then it is
1:39
also a reality that translations are
1:41
open to flaws logical and truthful
1:44
please basically he's arguing that
1:47
science that since the Bible has been
1:49
translated so many times in different
1:51
languages over the course of many years
1:53
it can no longer be trusted as the word
1:55
of God so I mean when I first read this
1:58
thing I kind of laughed a little because
2:00
I'm like this is kind of sad because
2:02
he's saying that because man translated
2:04
the scriptures in different languages no
2:07
so therefore it's no longer the word of
2:08
God so actually my uh my dad and mom
2:13
they don't speak English I mean they do
2:15
speak but it's like they don't speak
2:18
English they we from Togo so they speak
2:20
French so when they call to speak to my
2:23
kids I have to be the translator right I
2:25
translate what they telling me in in
2:27
English to my kids cuz they're speaking
2:29
French to me and I got to tell them my
2:31
kids that hey this is what he's saying
2:32
in in French so does that mean that I
2:34
lose the meaning of the message of
2:36
course not because I'm translating it so
2:39
what you really need to attack is the
2:41
Integrity of the translator the one that
2:43
is translating it so now he's telling me
2:45
that the Quran was written in Arabic and
2:48
therefore because it has not been
2:49
translated so therefore it is the word
2:51
of God first of all uh it's kind of
2:55
funny because whever is translating or
2:58
whever is receiving that message can
3:00
also choose to say hey this is what I
3:02
heard but this is what I'm going to
3:03
write right so it doesn't matter the
3:06
translation doesn't matter is the
3:07
messenger that matters the Integrity of
3:09
the messenger because the messenger can
3:12
say hey I heard this in Arabic but I'm
3:15
going to say this so it doesn't the
3:18
translation really has no bearings at
3:19
all again that's a basic argument but I
3:21
want to actually go and show you why the
3:24
text the text of scripture can be
3:26
trusted so I don't want to give like
3:28
basic argument actually want to go
3:30
through a series of steps to show you
3:31
that so let's jump into that look at the
3:34
dead SE Scrolls and the Old Testament
3:37
so what and the D Scrolls reveal about
3:41
the Old Testament that we have today
3:43
that's very important to understand now
3:45
the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in
3:47
1947 a herdsman found some unusual clay
3:51
jars in caves near the Valley of the
3:53
Dead Sea and the jars contained like a
3:55
number of Scrolls revealing the
3:57
religious beliefs of monastic farmers
3:59
lived in the Valley from 150 BC to ad 17
4:04
to
4:04
ad70 and the Desy Scrolls contain uh
4:08
fragments of almost every book of the
4:10
Old Testament and most importantly a
4:13
complete copy of the book of Isaiah now
4:16
this scroll was dated to approximately
4:18
100 BC and a comparison of the kumran
4:21
manuscripts of Isaiah listen to this
4:25
proved to be word for word identical
4:29
with our standard Hebrew Bible in more
4:32
than
4:33
95% of the text and someone would say
4:36
well that's still the 5% what about the
4:37
5% you said 95% what about the 5% here's
4:41
the thing the 5% differences were simply
4:44
a matter of spelling like you might
4:47
experience when using the word favor or
4:49
favor with o
4:50
Ur and finally some somewhere addition
4:54
of a word for the sake of clarity like
4:56
the the addition of the the Hebrew word
4:58
for light to the end of verse
5:01
531 in Isaiah 5311 following they shall
5:04
see the light so none of these
5:07
grammatical variations changed the
5:09
meaning of the text in any way in other
5:12
words there was no there was no
5:14
doctrinal change so the meaning of the
5:16
text did not change because favor was
5:20
spelled f a v o r instead of f a v o you
5:24
R okay maybe the scribes might have been
5:26
slipping that one time I don't know what
5:28
he was doing and maybe he misspelled a a
5:30
a a a word that does not change the
5:34
Integrity of the meaning of the text and
5:37
you need to understand why because what
5:39
compelled the ancient scribes to treat
5:42
these documents with such precisions and
5:44
meticulous care it was clearly their
5:47
belief that the document were themselves
5:50
sacred and given to them by God so when
5:54
they wrote those scriptures and copied
5:57
for the next generation and the Next
5:58
Generation they scribes I mean it was
6:01
rigorous work and if you really want to
6:04
know what the scribes and a scribe was
6:06
like I will encourage you I'll give you
6:08
a video maybe I I'll put it up here that
6:10
you can go and watch to see how rigorous
6:13
nobody could just be a scribed you had
6:14
to be trained to be a scribe so people
6:17
don't understand how serious these
6:19
people took this job and why is that
6:21
important it means that the content kept
6:24
its Integrity 2,000 years did not change
6:27
the content at all because the scribes
6:30
understood that these verses and these
6:32
sacred words were sacred that and they
6:35
were passing it on to the next
6:36
generation and they dared not temper
6:40
with the text this is important okay the
6:43
Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in
6:46
1947 and the content that we saw was
6:49
pretty much word for word for what we
6:51
have today so there is no variation at
6:54
all as far as the meaning of the text
6:58
okay so the doctrine has not changed the
7:00
message is the same there might be
7:02
spelling misspelling of certain words
7:04
but that did not change the content and
7:07
the meaning of the text I want you to
7:10
get that now let's talk about the New
7:13
Testament let's do
7:16
that the New Testament see the New
7:19
Testament was originally composed in the
7:21
Greek
7:22
language and there are approximately 55
7:25
5,500 copies in existence that contain
7:28
all or part of of the New Testament we
7:31
don't have the originals we don't have
7:33
the originals of the New Testament okay
7:36
I want you to understand that we only
7:37
have copies but the copies exist from a
7:41
very early date see the New Testament
7:44
was written about 50 to 90 ad and the
7:48
earliest fragment dates about ad 120
7:51
with about 150 other fragment dating
7:54
between 150 and 200 years from the time
7:56
of composition so between the time he
7:59
was comp poos the original and the
8:01
copies is about 150 to 250 years so some
8:04
people may say well that's a lot of
8:06
years but you need to understand some
8:08
things I'm going to show you a couple of
8:10
things here you need to compare what we
8:11
have about the New Testament and other
8:14
ancient writings okay for example the
8:17
earliest copy of Caesar's the garlic
8:19
Wars it dates about a th000 years after
8:22
it was written okay the earliest copy we
8:25
have in a manre is about a th000 years
8:28
removed from the original
8:30
yet nobody ever question the stories of
8:32
Caesar that we've heard okay and the
8:35
first copy of the Ary by Homer dates
8:38
about 2200 years after it was written
8:41
and again nobody questions those things
8:43
and when the interval between the the
8:45
writing of the New Testament and earlier
8:47
copies is compared to other ancient
8:49
works the New Testament proves to be
8:51
much closer to the time of the original
8:53
which is between 200 and 250 years this
8:56
is incredible okay now there's other
8:59
thing that you need to understand the
9:00
5,500 copies are far any way the most we
9:04
have of any ancient work because of why
9:08
the more manuscripts and more copies you
9:10
have the easier it is to reconstruct the
9:13
original because you can compare all
9:16
these manuscripts and come to the truth
9:18
what was really said because if you
9:20
don't have many copies how can you
9:22
compare and say Hey how do we know that
9:25
we only have two copies here and that's
9:27
all we have how do we know that this is
9:28
the truth with the abundance of
9:30
manuscripts it helps because now you can
9:33
see all these have been scattered all
9:35
over the places so now we can
9:36
reconstruct the original by just looking
9:39
at the manuscripts and the abundance of
9:41
manuscripts okay many ancient writings
9:44
have been transmitted to us by only a
9:45
handful of manuscripts for example
9:48
catalus three copies that's all and the
9:51
earliest one is600 years after he wrote
9:54
Herod this eight copies that's all we
9:57
have and it and and the time when he
10:00
wrote it was 1300 years so what you need
10:03
to understand is this on top of that the
10:05
New Testament was translated into
10:07
several other languages and we have
10:10
about 18,000 copies of those versions as
10:13
well a lot of more copies in other
10:16
languages so you can even go anywhere
10:19
and find those copies and compare it so
10:21
there's abundance of manuscript you have
10:23
so much information that we can Recon
10:25
reconstruct the scriptures in the
10:27
original now the question is somewh
10:29
someone would say to me well how can
10:31
these copies be trusted I just gave you
10:34
um a little bit of information but so
10:37
what do we do like how can we know that
10:38
this can be trusted well I'm glad you
10:40
asked because there's something else
10:41
that we have that maybe a lot of you
10:43
guys don't know and this is it like the
10:45
early church fathers the apostles they
10:47
had disciples okay for example polycarp
10:50
and papius they were Disciples of John
10:53
those are the first the first uh Century
10:55
church and in Clement of Rome was a
10:57
student of Paul the Apostle and Paul
10:59
Paul mentions Clement in many of his
11:01
Epistles and why am I mentioning these
11:03
individuals these men wrote letters to
11:05
their various churches and they were
11:07
also involved in great debate in which
11:10
they quoted and cited chunk of passages
11:13
of the New Testament and their letters
11:15
survived to this day so this is
11:18
incredible because you could literally
11:21
reconstruct close to the entire New
11:24
Testament by just reading those letters
11:26
it's
11:27
incredible and he was documented that uh
11:30
John buron he has cataloged more than
11:34
86,000 citations by the early church
11:37
fathers who site different portion of
11:40
the New Testament so basically you can
11:42
destroy every Bible that you have today
11:44
you can destroy and say away with these
11:47
people and destroy all these scriptures
11:50
you could really literally like
11:52
reconstruct most of the the scripture
11:55
the New Testament by just reading these
11:57
letters of the early church fathers you
11:59
can even reconstruct some of the Old
12:01
Testament because they also quoted the
12:03
Old Testament okay and our wish as
12:06
Believers in our day and age like we
12:08
will also spend time memorizing entire
12:11
books of the Bible like the early church
12:14
fathers because it would serve a lot of
12:16
purpose these guys would write letters
12:18
and you can check the early church uh
12:20
history you can go and check to see
12:21
their letters that their debate that
12:23
they were involved in they used
12:25
scriptures they quoted Paul they quote
12:28
John they quote Peter they will quote
12:30
Matthew in chunk of their passages just
12:32
to show and prove a point to me it's
12:35
incredible because even if you didn't
12:37
have the Bible you could read those
12:38
letters and understand the word of God
12:41
okay and I'm going to give you more like
12:44
this is not a new practice even the
12:46
apostles quoted the Old Testament in
12:49
their gospels and Epistles and to me
12:51
that is the most undeniable proof of the
12:54
integrity and authenticity of the New
12:56
Testament because the apostles PR pretty
12:59
much did what you call an exposition of
13:02
the Old Testament in the New Testament
13:05
they explained what the prophets wrote
13:08
about in the Old Testament and I want us
13:10
to go to Isaiah 53 let's go to Isaiah 53
13:14
here and I want us to see something I'm
13:15
going to read the entire
13:18
passage Isaiah 53 reads who has believed
13:22
what he has heard from us and to whom
13:26
has the arm of the Lord been revealed
13:28
for he grew grew up before him like a
13:30
young plant and like a root out of the
13:32
dry ground he had no form or Majesty
13:35
that we should look at him and no beauty
13:38
that we should desire him he was
13:40
despised and rejected by man A Man of
13:43
Sorrows and acquainted with grief and as
13:46
one from whom men hide their faces he
13:48
was despised and we esteemed him not
13:51
surely he has borne our griefs and
13:53
carried our sorrows yet we esteemed him
13:56
stricken Smitten by God and afflicted
13:59
but he was pierced for our
14:01
transgressions and he was crushed for
14:03
our iniquities upon him was the
14:05
chastisement that brought us peace and
14:08
with his wounds we are healed all we
14:10
like sheep have gone astray we have
14:13
turned everyone to his own way and the
14:16
lord has laid on him the iniquity of us
14:19
all he was oppressed and he was
14:21
afflicted yet he opened not his mouth
14:25
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter
14:27
and like a sheep that before his Shar is
14:29
silent so he opened not his mouth by
14:32
oppression and judgment he was taken
14:34
away and as for his generation who
14:37
considered that he was cut off out of
14:39
the land of the living streaking for the
14:42
transgression of my people and they made
14:44
his grave with the wicked and with a
14:46
rich man in his death although he had
14:48
done no violence and there was no deceit
14:50
in his mouth yet it was the will of the
14:52
Lord to crush him he has put him to
14:54
grief when his soul makes an offering
14:56
for Guilt he shall see his his Offspring
14:59
he shall prolong his days the will of
15:02
the Lord shall prosper in his hand out
15:04
of the anguish of his soul he shall see
15:06
and be
15:07
satisfied by his knowledge shall the
15:09
righteous one my servant make many to be
15:12
accounted righteous and he shall bear
15:14
their iniquities therefore I will divide
15:16
him a portion with the many and he shall
15:18
divide the spoiled with the strong
15:21
because he poured out his soul to death
15:23
and was DED with the transgressors yet
15:26
he bore the sin of many and makes inter
15:29
for
15:30
transgressors so my thing is this if you
15:32
truly understood the new test Old
15:34
Testament you would never question the
15:38
authenticity of the New Testament
15:40
because all the New Testament came to do
15:43
was to do an exposition of the Old
15:46
Testament basically reveal what these
15:49
scriptures meant the apostles spend
15:52
their time proving that Jesus was the
15:54
Christ by quoting and quoting Time and
15:57
Time and Again the old Testament and if
16:00
you truly understood the Old Testament
16:02
you will never question the New
16:04
Testament to me it's like it's an easy
16:06
proof because if you truly understood
16:08
the text of scripture when you read
16:10
Isaiah 53 you knew that this was
16:13
pointing to Jesus he was me for our
16:15
transgressions he's going to make many
16:19
righteous by his death and by his wound
16:21
we are healed the punishment that
16:23
brought of spe was upon him I mean who
16:26
is who is Isaiah talking about he was
16:30
crushed for our iniquities they pierced
16:32
him I mean everything points to Jesus so
16:35
how can I
16:36
question that if you truly understood
16:39
the Old Testament you will never
16:41
question the New Testament because the
16:43
old is in the new revealed and the new
16:45
is in the old
16:47
concealed so the text of scripture of
16:50
the New Testament is absolutely
16:54
authentic because not in my eyes but
16:57
because of the text of script scripture
16:59
of the Old Testament basically is a
17:01
continuation of the Old Testament the
17:03
New Testament basically proves what the
17:05
Old Testament was saying so there is no
17:08
questioning so to me I don't even have I
17:10
don't have this Fe like oh what if you
17:12
were lie to no
17:14
never yes I might have my share of Doubt
17:17
sometimes but when you go back to the
17:19
Old Testament you understand the message
17:22
when you read the letters of Paul you
17:25
read the Epistles of Paul you read first
17:28
Peter second Peter you read 1 John 3rd
17:30
John John chapter 1 everything if you
17:33
read the Matthew's gospel Luke's gospel
17:36
you understand that every Old Testament
17:40
prophecy was fulfilled in the new most
17:43
of it you can see the continuation you
17:45
can see that the Old Testament was
17:47
pointed to Jesus so there is no
17:49
questioning the Integrity of the text
17:53
you know people actually believe the Old
17:55
Testament Muslims believe the Old
17:56
Testament so it's like how can you miss
17:59
it do read the whole thing to truly
18:04
understand okay so to me there is no
18:06
question at all because if you truly
18:08
understood the old the new would just
18:11
give you
18:13
peace now create doubt where he give you
18:15
peace now I can answer his question with
18:18
a B basic argument he's saying that
18:20
translations corrupt the original text
18:23
which is really to me a little asine
18:25
because from the way he wrote I can see
18:27
that he's not a native English speaker
18:29
just like me I'm not a native English
18:31
speaker yet he uses the English language
18:33
to communicate with me does that mean
18:36
that what he's saying to me can't be
18:38
trusted because he's using English and
18:41
not Arabic I mean you see it's like
18:43
Point your gun into your ho and then
18:45
boom it's like come on man now here's
18:49
what I'll
18:50
say that even shows me because the Bible
18:53
has been translated in so many languages
18:55
it shows me that whoever translated it
18:58
cared so so much about the message that
19:00
they wanted the whole world to hear it
19:04
because they said this is good news the
19:08
gospel so we want every living being to
19:12
hear this message of the truth so
19:15
therefore we're going to make sure it is
19:17
publicized and translated in as many
19:19
language as possible or in every
19:22
language this to me is incredible
19:24
because here's the thing if I'm going to
19:27
China and I'm going to preach to Chinese
19:29
people if I'm going to Taiwan if I'm
19:31
going to Germany if I'm going to any
19:33
other country I need to make sure they
19:36
hear the message in their language
19:37
because they don't speak what I speak
19:39
you can't go to a a group of people that
19:41
speaks German and start preaching to
19:44
them in English they're not going to
19:45
hear you you got to you got to learn
19:47
their language or you got to translate
19:48
the text of scripture in their language
19:50
so they can read it and understand it so
19:52
to me those that did the translations
19:55
kudos to them because they care so much
19:57
about this good news that they say
19:59
we got to make sure everybody hears this
20:01
in their language we got to make sure we
20:03
publicize as many copies in as many
20:05
different languages possible because
20:07
this is the truth this is the truth we
20:09
want everybody to hear it so keeping the
20:12
scripture in one language and say well
20:15
if you want to learn about God then you
20:16
have to you have to learn
20:18
Hebrew I mean if you want to learn about
20:21
God then you have to learn the Greek
20:23
language come on if you want to learn
20:26
about God guess what we're going to
20:27
translate it in your language so we make
20:29
sure it gets to you that's the love of
20:33
the translators they understood how much
20:35
God loved the world and they said we're
20:37
going to make sure everybody going to
20:39
hear this message in their language
20:41
we're not going to keep it in Hebrew
20:43
we're not going to keep it in in Aramaic
20:45
we're not going to keep it in Greek but
20:46
we're going to make sure French English
20:49
German Arabic uh farsy um you name it
20:54
Spanish every language is going to get
20:56
the scripture in their own language
20:57
because we care so much about those
20:59
people that we want them to hear this
21:01
beautiful message of the
21:02
Gospel so the translations actually
21:06
amplifies the truth of the Gospel it
21:08
doesn't diminish it it doesn't corrupt
21:10
it it amplifies the the message it gives
21:13
the weight of the message because people
21:15
want other people to hear
21:19
it by the way I just wanted to end with
21:22
this I know that no matter how I present
21:25
this
21:27
argument many people people may reject
21:29
it because what it is not up to me to
21:32
change your heart scripture says no one
21:35
can come to Jesus unless drawn by the
21:37
spirit of God unless God the Father
21:39
draws him so it is the work of the
21:42
spirit but why do I do these
21:45
things I do it because I believe maybe
21:48
the Lord is going to use this to speak
21:50
to you I can't change you maybe the
21:53
Lord's going to use me as the messenger
21:56
to give you this message
21:59
and also I want to let you know if you
22:01
have been encouraged by these messages
22:03
please do support t.com because I
22:05
started t.com for the sake of answering
22:08
difficult questions and talking about
22:10
these kind of tough topics and the Lord
22:12
has endowed me with this kind of ability
22:14
to do this so if you feel like you've
22:17
been led to support this please do so
22:20
today because this whole thing is run by
22:23
myself the website everything that I
22:25
write is just oneman operation now I'm
22:27
not saying one man in the sense that I'm
22:29
just solo and I'm doing this alone no
22:31
because scripture also says it is God
22:34
who works in me both to Will and act
22:36
according to his good purpose so I
22:38
believe God grace empowers me to do what
22:42
I do so if you believe this has helped
22:43
you and you want to support do so I
22:45
would truly appreciate it Merry
22:47
Christmas and I'll see you next time
22:49
thank you very much
#People & Society
#Religion & Belief
#Sensitive Subjects