0:00
He's taken to X and he's throwing a bit
0:01
of shade at me. He posts a picture of my
0:04
headline, "Zac Goldsmith's economic
0:06
agenda is dangerous and popular." Well,
0:08
it's good that he's engaging. I
0:09
appreciate that. The comments are
0:11
interesting. Dangerous to tax-dodging
0:14
Okay, well, that's not me.
0:16
Thatcher-bashing. It's dangerous if
0:18
you're a billionaire. Only 1% of the
0:20
country cares what the city says.
0:22
Okay, then that's entirely true. Lots of
0:24
comments about whether you can enlarge
0:26
somebody's breasts through the process
0:29
Then that refers to his previous career.
0:31
I'm being accused of being owned by the
0:33
billionaires. This is a fairly common
0:34
criticism that if I disagree with the
0:36
sort of radical left-wing economic
0:38
agenda of somebody like Zac Goldsmith,
0:39
the only possible explanation is that
0:41
I'm being paid to take that position.
0:43
"It's amazing how all the rich and
0:44
greedy don't want life to be better for
0:46
everyone else." Well, is that what I'm
0:48
saying at all? No. Revolution, let the
0:50
fightback start. "Zac City AM has long
0:52
joined in the corrupt attacks on Corbyn
0:54
and has sabotaged our democracy."
0:56
Okay, if that's the way you want to see
0:58
it. Good debate. Glad that Zac has
