0:00
how's it going guys I'm Dr Richie kwin
0:01
and today we're going to talk about
0:03
doing something that humans just can't
0:05
get enough of ranking things and putting
0:12
lists specifically we're going to talk
0:14
about ranking fruit and veg by how
0:16
healthy they are how you do it whether
0:19
it's something you should even worry
0:21
about unsurprisingly people have tried
0:23
to rank different foods including fruit
0:25
and veg in many different ways over the
0:27
past few decades the thing is ranking a
0:30
food by how healthy it is isn't the
0:32
easiest thing to do think about it like
0:34
this what do you base the ranking on do
0:36
you base it on vitamins and minerals if
0:37
so which ones are some more important
0:39
than others should they score higher why
0:42
do you include macronutrients like
0:43
protein fat and carbs what about
0:45
calories what about nutrients that we
0:47
know we don't want to get lots of like
0:49
saturated fat or sugar it all gets quite
0:52
complicated to understand this all a
0:54
little better let's talk about nutrient
0:56
density the most widely accepted way to
0:58
Define nutrient density is the amount of
1:00
a nutrient found in a portion of food
1:02
that provides 100 calories for example
1:04
so basically it's the amount of a
1:06
specific nutrient per 100 calories this
1:08
means that the more calories of food
1:09
provides think high fat or high sugar
1:11
foods the lower the nutrient density is
1:13
probably going to be but we don't want
1:15
to focus on just one nutrient ideally
1:17
we'd like to look at a load of
1:18
beneficial nutrients because Foods
1:20
generally provide many different
1:22
nutrients together well one way of doing
1:24
this was developed by a well-known
1:25
researcher in the United States called
1:26
Adam josi who developed something called
1:28
the nutrient rich food index or NRF
1:31
index to help categorize Foods the NRF
1:34
index works by using an algorithm to
1:36
score foods which takes two sets of
1:38
nutrients into account the first part is
1:40
the sum of percentages of the daily
1:42
recommended intake of nine beneficial
1:43
nutrients which are protein fiber
1:45
vitamin A vitamin C vitamin E calcium
1:47
iron magnesium and pottassium the second
1:49
part involves subtracting the sum of the
1:51
percentage of the maximum recommended
1:53
amount of three nutrients that are best
1:55
to limit which are saturated fat added
1:58
sugar and sodium these are then all
2:00
calculated together per calorie so in
2:02
one of the first studies to use the
2:04
score they calculated the nutrient-rich
2:06
food index for the major food groups and
2:08
they produced a really interesting graph
2:10
it scores food groups on a scale with
2:12
either positive or negative scores the
2:15
further to the right on the graph the
2:16
higher the NRF index or basically the
2:19
higher the nutrient density per 100
2:21
calories as you can see at the far right
2:23
of the graph are fruit and vegetables
2:25
this basically means they provide a lot
2:27
of nutrients in very few calories which
2:29
which is the definition of nutrient
2:31
dense now if you look at the far left of
2:33
the graph we can see sugars sweets and
2:36
sweetened drinks and we can also see
2:38
fats and oils both in the negative below
2:41
zero this is because sugars tend to be
2:43
so refined that they don't provide any
2:45
nutrients while providing plenty of
2:47
calories it's similar for fats which
2:49
provide very few nutrients but a lot of
2:51
calories one of the big problems with
2:53
this graph is that it categorizes whole
2:55
food groups together the grain category
2:57
for example includes both refined and
2:58
whole grains if you separated them
3:01
refined grains would score lower and
3:02
whole grains would score higher the same
3:04
goes for meat and dairy categories if
3:06
you separated them based on fat content
3:08
lower fat meat and dairy would score a
3:10
lot higher than high fat meat and dairy
3:12
so it's far from a perfect scoring
3:14
system but interesting nonetheless now
3:17
this doesn't mean that you should only
3:18
eat Foods on the right and never eat
3:19
Foods on the left but it gives us a
3:21
decent reason to get more of our foods
3:23
from the right nutrient inside there's
3:25
still plenty of scope to eat the foods
3:27
in the middle too one other thing I want
3:29
to talk about in this graph is the
3:30
relative height above the bottom axis of
3:32
each food group the lower the food group
3:34
is the cheaper it is per 100 calories
3:37
the higher the food group is the more
3:38
expensive it is per 100 calories now
3:41
this adds a really interesting bit of
3:43
extra context to the graph fruit and
3:45
vegetables are the most nutrient-dense
3:48
but are also the most expensive on a per
3:50
calorie basis on the other hand sugars
3:53
and sweets fats and oils are the least
3:55
nutrient-dense but also some of the
3:56
cheapest food groups around this helps
3:58
explain one of the reasons why people
4:00
tend to eat more processed foods high in
4:02
refined sugars and fats and therefore
4:04
calories and why they don't eat as many
4:07
vegetables unfortunately the cheapest
4:09
foods with the most calories tend to be
4:11
the least nutritious now this is a video
4:14
about fruit and vegetables so let's take
4:15
a look at some specific data for
4:17
individual fruits and veggies
4:19
unfortunately I only found one paper
4:21
that has listed some fruits and veggies
4:23
according to their nutrient density and
4:25
unfortunately it only gave data for high
4:27
nutrient density fruit and veg because
4:29
the paper was focusing on what they
4:30
called Powerhouse fruit and veg also
4:33
instead of the nine beneficial nutrients
4:35
analyzed in the NRF index that we just
4:37
mentioned this score used 17 nutrients
4:40
and it also factored in bioavailability
4:43
the index didn't take negative nutrients
4:45
into account like the NRF index but it
4:46
did factor in the nutrients on a per
4:48
calorie basis and all the values are
4:50
presented on a scale of 0 to 100 here's
4:52
the list of the top five and the bottom
4:54
five fruit and veg they analyzed
4:56
remember all of these are already
4:57
considered Powerhouse vegetables meaning
4:59
they all have a high nutrient density
5:02
the top five most nutrient-dense Foods
5:04
were water grass with a score of 100
5:06
Chinese cabbage at 91.9 charred at
5:15
so lots of green leafy vegetables no
5:19
surprise there really the bottom five on
5:21
the list which all still have a score
5:23
above 10 where turnup with 11.43
5:28
11.39% 10.69 sweet potatoes at 10.51 and
5:32
white grapefruit at 10.47 and just to
5:35
give you an idea of the foods somewhere
5:36
in the middle red pepper scored 41.2 6
5:40
broccoli scored 34.8 n pumpkin was
5:46
22.6 tomato 20.3 7 strawberries 17.59%
6:00
the list isn't exhaustive as there are
6:02
plenty of fruits and vegetables that
6:04
weren't tested and fruit and veg that
6:06
score lower are still very
6:08
nutrient-dense and you absolutely should
6:10
eat them especially if you like them so
6:13
if you like mushrooms which I didn't
6:14
mention here at all keep eating them now
6:18
like I mentioned earlier there are lots
6:19
of different factors and nutrients that
6:21
you should take into account when
6:22
creating these lists some are better
6:25
than others but the truth is that no one
6:27
algorithm will give a perfect ranking
6:30
with that in mind there's another way of
6:32
ranking Foods in terms of how healthy
6:34
they are and that's based on their orac
6:36
score orac stands for oxygen radical
6:39
absorbance capacity it's a lab test that
6:42
tries to measure total antioxidant
6:44
capacity of a food by placing a sample
6:46
of the food in a test tube along with
6:48
certain chemicals that generate free
6:50
radical activity and other molecules
6:52
that can be easily oxidized orac isn't
6:55
the only way to measure this and there
6:56
are other methods like frap or feric
6:58
reducing antiox oxgen power which
7:00
measures the reducing power of foods if
7:02
you've not heard of that word before
7:03
reduction is the chemically opposite
7:06
process of oxidation foods that better
7:08
protect the sample from oxidation get a
7:10
higher orac score which means they're
7:12
probably pretty good at protecting the
7:13
body from oxidation at least in theory
7:16
because remember what happens in a test
7:17
tube doesn't necessarily happen in the
7:19
body too that's it we do know that a
7:21
higher intake of high orac Foods is
7:23
associated with lower risk of death from
7:25
heart disease cancer and all cause
7:27
mortality in general so a aing for a
7:30
high orax score from your diet is
7:32
probably a good idea one study that
7:34
looked at the orax score for some common
7:36
vegetables had the following results
7:38
which are per gram of food and not per
7:41
calorie like we talked about earlier
7:42
with nutrient density as you can see
7:44
peas and carrots are lower on the list
7:46
but still have a very measurable
7:48
antioxidant capacity and green peppers
7:50
and spinach are high in the list as a
7:52
general rule the more colorful or the
7:54
more deeply colored the food the higher
7:56
the orx score this is because many
7:58
pigments in fruit and vegetables are
7:59
also polyenals which have powerful
8:01
antioxidant properties this is why
8:03
you'll often hear people saying you
8:04
should eat the rainbow when it comes to
8:06
fruit and fetch those colors are really
8:09
good for you there's also a massive list
8:11
of over 3,000 Foods including fruits
8:14
veggies drinks nuts and even Meats
8:16
ranked by their frap values called the
8:19
antioxidant food table it's by Carlson
8:22
at all and while I'm not going to go
8:24
through the whole list you can check it
8:26
out by searching the paper title from
8:28
the caption under this video to give a
8:30
little summary generally berries such as
8:32
blueberries cranberries and blackberries
8:34
are known for having a high antioxidant
8:36
capacity as do plums and their dried
8:38
form prunes which is probably due to
8:40
their deep color and antioxidant content
8:44
on the other hand watermelon and bananas
8:46
while nutritious and delicious have a
8:47
lower antioxidant capacity than man
8:49
berries and other fruits as for veggies
8:51
spinach and other leafy greens have
8:53
higher antioxidant capacities as do Arch
8:56
jokes if you're particularly POS and
8:58
actually eat those on the the lower end
8:59
of the scale white potatoes generally
9:02
have lower antioxidant content compared
9:04
to more colorful vegetables and iceberg
9:06
lettuce has a lower antioxidant content
9:08
compared to darker leafy greens like I
9:10
said deeply colored fruit and veggies
9:13
are usually great from an antioxidant
9:15
perspective so what should you do with
9:17
all this information should you base all
9:20
your fruit and veg decisions on nutrient
9:22
density scores and antioxidant
9:23
capacities I don't think so most people
9:27
simply don't eat enough fruit and
9:29
vegetables full stop most people's goal
9:32
should be to just eat more fruits and
9:33
veggies and to do that focus on the
9:35
fruits and veggies that you enjoy first
9:38
after that if you really want to get the
9:40
most Bang from your buck out of the
9:41
fruit and veg that you eat you could
9:43
start adding more fruit and veg with
9:45
high nutrient densities or high orac or
9:47
frap scores or simply eat more leafy
9:51
green veggies and berries along with
9:53
plenty of other colorful fruit and veg
9:56
winning as always if you have any more
9:59
question let me know in the comments
10:00
below and remember to like And subscribe
10:02
to the my protein YouTube channel for
10:03
more great evidence-based nutrition