'Disbarred!' - Letitia James Gets Devastating Career News

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Savio for Explain America and Letitia James is facing

massive issues in her case against Trump. This thing could go to the Supreme Court

It could end with her being disbarred. Before we get started, please make sure you like

comment, share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our

channel continue to grow. A lot of legal experts have said there is a possible 8th Amendment

violation here in the fine against Trump. Now if you don't know the full text of the

8th Amendment, basically it says you cannot have excessive bail, you cannot have excessive fines

you cannot have cruel and unusual punishment. Well if almost a half a billion dollars is not

an excessive fine, you'd be hard pressed to find what would be an excessive fine. In fact

some people are predicting, including the person I'm going to show you

that if this goes to the Supreme Court it's going to be a 9-0 debacle for Letitia James

That even the Democrats would be like, wait a second, this is too far. That person is Vivek

Ramaswamy. Now Vivek Ramaswamy says that the Supreme Court not only could rule 9-0 in this

case, but this whole case could end with James being disbarred. And I think she should be

She's absolutely got a target on Trump. She campaigned on getting the man. Brings up this

archaic law to go after his business and then pushes for this massive ridiculous fine in a

victimless crime. Absolute ridiculousness. Vivek explains it in great detail and I want you to

listen to him and then please like, comment, share and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for

Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care everybody

The Letitia James crusade against Donald Trump is disgusting and is a threat to every American

When you have prosecutors who are elected to office on a promise of going after one particular

individual as she campaigned on, then go on to keep a campaign promise using the legal system

to do it, it's unjust. And this particular case reveals how ugly that is. In this case

you're talking about a crime for which there was literally no identifiable victim. The people who

did business with Donald Trump weren't individual consumers. They were sophisticated financial

institutions who made money from their dealings. And yet Letitia James is using a consumer

protection statute to literally make up numbers and say, hey, you have hundreds of millions of

dollars in penalties that you owe. You have bond post by a particular date of an unreasonable

magnitude that even no billionaire is going to regularly able to meet and to say, if you don't

do it, I'm going to start seizing your property. It's disgusting. And it is a threat to not only

private property, but threat to the justice system and to the rights of every American

But the good news is there is an argument to push back against this in short order. And that's the

eighth amendment. The eighth amendment prevents the imposition of excessive bail or excessive

fines. And if there's ever an example that meets that to a T, it's the bond that's been demanded

of Donald Trump in this disgusting New York Letitia James led prosecution. This is an

opportunity for the Supreme Court to step in and say, no, we're not going to stand for this kind

of lawfare, whether it's against Donald Trump or a Democrat, it's wrong. We don't want to empower

prosecutors to be able to use bond and bail or bonds as a way of effectively achieving a goal

that they couldn't achieve through the front door, which is bankrupting an opponent, even stopping

them from being able to appeal those decisions. That's un-American. It needs to end now, not just

for the protection of Donald Trump, but for the protection of every American. And in this disaster

I at least see a silver lining of some hope that that's exactly what we'll get from the Supreme

Court. It's not just the current justices, not even the conservative ones that would necessarily

agree with this principle. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a staunch defender of this part of the eighth

amendment as well. She's no longer with us, but the other justices are. And I hope this can be

another nine to zero rebuke of the kind of lawfare that we're seeing against Donald Trump and

indirectly against every American in this country today. And I think it could be the most important

eighth amendment case of the 21st century. I hope they bring it and I hope they succeed