live_tv
Livestream Starting Soon
00
Hours
:
00
Minutes
:
00
Seconds
Up next in 10
It’s Celtic fans vs. Superscoreboard . After a heated session on Superscoreboard, we’re looking at the "embarrassing" dismissal of legitimate #celticfc fan concerns surrounding John Beaton. This isn't just about one game; it's about the narrative being pushed against the Parkhead faithful.
We dive into the panel's comments, the historical context they ignored, and why this specific "pile-on" feels like a breaking point for many supporters. Don't miss our deep dive into the fallout.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Welcome to the Bond Celtic YouTube
0:02
channel. Please like, subscribe, and
0:04
share if you enjoy this video.
0:13
Welcome to the next installment of the B
0:15
Celtic podcast where we take a look at
0:18
dismantling Gordon Duncan and Yuks. In
0:22
fact, not as Celtic fans dismantle them.
0:25
I call it John beaten refereeing again
0:28
and Celtics spend over Mville and it's
0:30
weird how these two guys who scope will
0:32
defend him. Have a listen.
0:34
>> What about Kevin? Hi Kevin.
0:36
>> Hello there.
0:37
>> What are you thinking?
0:38
>> It's just regarding the the refereeing
0:40
performance today. I thought he was very
0:42
carappy against Celtic players for
0:44
minimal contact but the the blaring
0:48
mistake which he's made with the penalty
0:49
decision. He's seven yards away and Dian
0:52
M is ready to head the ball into an
0:54
empty net when he wrestled to the ground
0:57
and John beaten can't see that and it's
0:59
having to go to VR. I mean that that is
1:03
total incompetence in my mind and I
1:05
think it should be took that's the last
1:07
two games refereed in the league where
1:09
he's deni denied Celtic a penalty but is
1:12
VAR that's had to pull him over. Yeah,
1:13
but I mean to like see see in the VAR
1:16
era I mean of course technically you're
1:17
right Kevin but John beaten still gave
1:19
you the penalty against Rangers he still
1:21
gave you the penalty today
1:24
we Gordon here strategy clever John
1:27
beaten didn't give the penalty John
1:28
beaten awarded a goal kick because he
1:30
missed the penalty he didn't believe
1:32
that the f by longo was an actual
1:35
penalty f wasn't until v picked it up
1:38
and told John it changed his decision
1:40
that with the penalty was given so he'll
1:42
technically Gordon Duncan is correct.
1:44
He's trying to be a smart Alia.
1:46
>> Is it Is it really worth getting this
1:48
upset about a decision that actually
1:51
goes your way in the end?
1:53
>> No, John beat never gave it. John the
1:55
referee get the referee gives the
1:57
decision.
1:59
>> It was clear. How can he know if he if
2:02
he can't see that for seven yards, he
2:04
shouldn't be officiating at top level.
2:05
>> That's fine, Kevin. But I feel like
2:06
you're ignoring the point when you we've
2:08
all get decisions about sort of how
2:10
outraged we get and like what the big
2:11
issues are versus the small issues. You
2:13
got a penalty and Motherwell went down
2:16
to 10 men. So you know that's that's the
2:18
big that's the that's the big outcome
2:19
here.
2:20
>> John being the penalty. John being
2:22
awarded a gold kick because he missed
2:23
the penalty.
2:24
>> May I add
2:25
>> what's that? Sorry
2:26
>> sly deserved down to 10.
2:28
>> Kevin what's your thoughts? I'm getting
2:30
a lot of text from the Oxley Chamberlain
2:35
>> and this is a point where the pundits
2:37
don't like what the Celic fans saying
2:38
because it improved rang and then they
2:40
all start to gang up on them and the
2:42
deflect hence the talk about the Alex
2:45
Oxide Chamberlain tackle which is
2:47
nothing to do with the point the
2:48
caller's making. So I typical from super
2:51
scoreboard and Gordon Duncan but not
2:53
surprising.
2:55
The oxide chamber one was as soft a
2:57
tackle as you'll see in Scottish
2:59
football.
2:59
>> But once he was already on a booking,
3:01
what about the next one he made?
3:04
>> And yes, there's a point. The call is
3:05
actually a green with Gordon Duncan, but
3:08
he wants to pursue this kind of rhetoric
3:11
that John beaten somehow isn't an inept
3:14
referee whenever he referees a Celtic
3:16
game and that we get decisions
3:19
in favor. It's quite embarrassing for
3:22
this pundit actually. It it wasn't a
3:24
hard challenge. The moral player had the
3:26
same tackle Oxley Chamberlain made 15
3:28
minutes after.
3:28
>> No, that's not it's not as though I said
3:29
once he was on the booking. What about
3:31
the challenge later on that he didn't
3:32
get a second booking for?
3:34
>> He made contact with the ball first if
3:36
you watched it right.
3:38
>> Well, I I said to you I I gave you fan
3:41
speak earlier on. It's John beaten.
3:43
Therefore, the Celtic fans all say John
3:45
beaten is anti-eltic. Well, and and by
3:48
the way, a quick look at a quick look at
3:49
social media is full of non Celtic fans,
3:53
shall we say, saying that it was a
3:54
disgrace that Celtic got the penalty and
3:57
that that um that Emanuel
4:00
>> those non Celtic fans being Rangers and
4:03
Mother supporters, those impartial fans
4:05
that have no skin in this result or
4:07
maybe even hearts fans. Is that what
4:09
you're saying? is that John Beer on two
4:11
occasions in quick succession has uh
4:14
made a mistake has gone to VAR who have
4:17
invited him to examine his mistake and
4:20
twice has come to the conclusion that he
4:22
did make a mistake and changed his mind
4:26
and gave Celtic penalties. John Beaton
4:28
is forever cursed because the Celtic
4:30
fans think that he's anti-eltic.
4:32
>> I think
4:34
>> Celtic fans don't think John beaten's
4:36
anti-eltic. Celtic fans know he's
4:39
anti-Seltic. I mean, he's the only
4:40
referee that's been snapped inside a
4:43
Rangers pub and joining a paint with
4:44
Rangers fans after officiating a Glasgow
4:47
derby where he gave a contentious
4:49
penalty against Celtic to earn a draw.
4:52
Keven's you follow Pashmate and you've
4:55
been called again as well as Gordon
4:56
Duncan. But this next bit is a bel
5:02
Rangers goalkeeper
5:04
>> in John Beat's defense as well. When you
5:06
look at the the corner as an instant,
5:08
you've got 15 16 bodies in a box that
5:11
you're trying to watch a ball the flight
5:12
of the ball coming in. All these bodies
5:14
moving.
5:15
>> Hold up. Hold up. Hold up. Hold up. How
5:18
many bodies were in the were in the the
5:21
pentley box joining for position? 16.
5:24
You see? Let's have a we look.
5:26
>> So, I can understand why he he misses or
5:29
he doesn't see the the the complete
5:31
contact on my
5:34
>> Jesus Christ. It's it's in plain sight
5:36
and tip. Let's carry on.
5:39
>> Again, we mentioned how long is he held
5:40
for is a goal scoring opportunity. So, I
5:43
can understand why he misses that and
5:44
that's why we've got VA because as you
5:46
say ultimately he goes to the screen.
5:47
He's the one that makes about all this
5:49
stuff
5:50
>> is that Martin O'Neal tonight has had
5:52
what we're calling the statement result.
5:54
Celtic have with a seriously weakened
5:58
squad are two points off the top of the
6:00
league. But the first thing that Kevin
6:03
give Ben Gob is John beaten
6:05
>> for a penalty that he gave.
6:07
>> Yes.
6:07
>> Yeah.
6:09
>> Just so we know Gordon when when should
6:11
Celtic fans call it inep refereeing
6:13
again by John beaten? Should it be after
6:15
defeat because then it would t him as we
6:18
would be labeled as better. We'll be
6:19
told we've just got s grapes. If mother
6:22
had won that today would they have been
6:23
told that oh you are just complaining
6:26
about beating again. So when is it? And
6:29
just for the record, beating didn't he
6:31
give the the penalty? V did.
6:34
>> Let's thank Kenneth and bring in Mark
6:36
cuz in park,
6:38
>> how you getting on, Gordon? You all
6:39
right?
6:39
>> Good to you.
6:40
>> H not too bad. Not too bad. Just back
6:42
for the game.
6:43
>> Happy with that. Does it feel like a big
6:44
win?
6:45
>> It's a massive win. It's massive getting
6:48
a side there. M are better coach than us
6:52
as if I've got better players than us
6:53
and have their intensity. It's just on a
6:56
different level. So no, it's a massive
6:58
win.
6:59
>> What about the do you think it I mean
7:02
it's always hard to say sort of how big
7:03
just now because we don't know what
7:06
hearts do tonight, what injured do
7:07
tomorrow, but does this feel like
7:08
despite the limited performances that
7:10
that they've got a bit of momentum in
7:12
this title race?
7:13
>> I think it's just all down to Martin
7:15
O'Neal and the coaching staff to be
7:16
honest with you. I think they'll just
7:18
bring a new lease of life into players
7:19
that are below par. That's they're no
7:21
decent players and they're going to be
7:22
at any other season. I would but I'm
7:24
actually just floing just to pick up in
7:26
the caller's point two calls ago with
7:28
regards to the refereeing performance. I
7:30
just I would just like to ask if Esther
7:33
Celtic won when is the when is the right
7:34
time when do you think the right time
7:36
that we can criticize referees? If you
7:38
can if you can criticize them after a
7:40
defeat, you can criticize them after a
7:42
win. When's the right time to criticize
7:43
referees? Cuz John beaten was shocking a
7:45
day. That's a fucking fantastic point
7:47
and I'm sure this impalial pundit team
7:50
who are crying over a winner are going
7:52
to tell us.
7:53
>> So just putting that to the panel when
7:54
when's it all right to criticize
7:56
referees?
7:56
>> Well, you you can previous caller did
7:59
it. I suspect you're about to do it.
8:01
>> I'm not going to do I'm just asking you
8:03
because the guy came on and was talking
8:05
about being called happy and there was a
8:07
pile on for yourself and the pundits
8:09
with regards to or just be happy you win
8:11
the games your first thoughts about
8:13
referees. Do you know what I mean? Well,
8:15
he was attack was the day the first
8:18
challenge with Oxley Chamberling. It
8:19
probably is a yellow card, right? Is a
8:21
bit cynical, but he wasn't going to he
8:22
wasn't going to get out to start with
8:24
then it goes back and books him. Can I
8:26
understand that then after it
8:28
>> you just said you just said it probably
8:29
was a yellow card then you said you
8:30
can't understand why he books him. No,
8:32
Gordon. What he's saying is he's
8:34
pointing out that mistake by beating
8:36
even though was the the right quality
8:38
book the Celtic player. He still made a
8:41
mistake by not booking him in the first
8:42
place because to call the play back. How
8:45
hard is it to understand how difficult
8:47
is this?
8:48
>> No, I can't understand why he wasn't
8:49
going to he I can understand why is I
8:52
can't understand why John beaten walks
8:53
away for it. Why isn't he going to get a
8:55
foul? Gives the f and then goes do you
8:57
know what actually I'm going to get when
8:58
I didn't actually want to get a fed. So
9:00
but I'm talking about after that there
9:02
was three cical fouls late challenges.
9:04
There was one inki there was one in yang
9:06
and then I think there was one inati as
9:08
well where there's no attempt to play
9:10
the ball for the m player there's m's
9:12
first card was about 60 minutes today.
9:15
So it was kind of card for the day with
9:17
regards to and he did let m away with
9:19
similar cynical challenges. That's John.
9:22
That's John beaten there again to follow
9:24
up as well. He's constantly making
9:25
mistakes and it's all right to say I but
9:27
he's he's correcting his mistakes for V.
9:29
But you're constantly using V because of
9:31
the poor fishing in the country. Would
9:33
you agree or do you disagree in that?
9:36
>> Well, I mean I don't know how clear it
9:38
could be made to these pundits about how
9:41
bad John beans are fishing is. Now, this
9:43
guy, a Celtic fan, gave them three
9:47
instances where Mull players were only
9:49
they booked, but I'm sure they're going
9:51
to give their impartial opinion and
9:53
explain exactly why um the mother
9:55
players when they booked and how a
9:57
mother player wasn't booked until the
9:58
60th minute, right? Right, Gordon?
10:01
>> Just that's just what Var's there for. I
10:03
don't know if it's agree or disagree.
10:05
That's the rest by for what it's worth.
10:07
Ref still get marked down when they make
10:09
a mistake that needs corrected by VAR.
10:11
But you know it's that's why I think
10:14
pretty much every league top league in
10:15
the world has it now. So Celtic deserved
10:17
their penalty, got their penalty.
10:20
You know that's just kind of what it's
10:21
there for. We'll never really know now
10:22
what you almost forget what life is like
10:24
without it.
10:25
>> Mark, I've made the point that I think
10:27
the Celtics supporters have an obsession
10:29
with John Meen.
10:30
>> Now we all know what Hugh is alluding to
10:32
here when he uses that word obsession.
10:34
We all know what he's trying to do. He's
10:37
trying to deflect. He's trying to kind
10:39
of create a rhetoric, using a word that
10:42
Rangers fans continually use whenever
10:44
facts are pointed out about their dead
10:45
club. But now when it comes to John
10:48
beaten, she appeals at that word just to
10:50
try and antagonize or try to deflect can
10:52
see right through it. And to be fair to
10:53
a Celtic fan, he keeps going.
10:55
>> Why? Why do you think that H? Where does
10:57
that come to you think?
10:59
>> Well, probably what you said, Mark. It's
11:00
not that you're not allowed, but if if
11:02
it if it's your dominant thought after a
11:05
win, then you might win the league
11:06
>> in a short space of time. Mark, he's
11:09
made two mistakes and corrected his own
11:11
mistakes.
11:11
>> By the way, see on that, let's be
11:13
abundantly clear about something. Not
11:15
one of us spotted that don.
11:17
>> What the fuck is that going today or
11:19
anything? It's a completely different
11:21
game. That game is passed weeks ago.
11:24
We're talking about John beaten now at a
11:26
Motherwell game and he's bringing up the
11:28
Rangers ham balls. Why was that got you
11:31
to do anything? The caught the points
11:33
these two Celtic fan callers have made
11:35
absolutely nothing.
11:36
>> Berling hand ball. So this notion about
11:38
mistake, I mean, if you want to be
11:39
technical about it, the ref misses it
11:41
and Var helps him get there. But but let
11:44
let's not be let's not be too clever
11:47
after the event. Nobody thought that was
11:49
a handball. In my personal opinion, the
11:51
Celtic supporters are obsessed by John
11:53
Beaton and they're obsessed by him
11:55
because they believe that he's
11:56
anti-eltic and wants to try and prevent
11:58
them from winning matches.
12:00
>> Celtic fans don't think John beaten
12:03
anti-eltic. Celtic fans know he's
12:05
anti-eltic.
12:06
>> That for me is it in a nutshell. Mark
12:09
began his call by saying, "Motherwell
12:13
looked more intense, better coached
12:17
than Celtic and said, describe Celtic as
12:20
a poor team." I go back to my original
12:24
thought on that. I think it's
12:27
disrespectful to go on about the
12:29
refereeful,
12:32
disrespectful to Martin O'Neal and to
12:33
Shawn Maloney and Mark Fingham who are
12:36
bringing these results together.
12:39
Now I'll tell you it's disrespectful.
12:41
Disrespectful is every pundit piling on
12:43
to Celtic fans who are making a point
12:46
when they're factually incorrect. The
12:48
pundits are talking absolute nonsense.
12:50
Cammy Bells like a sales Jordan beat you
12:53
was laughable. Gordon Duncan talking
12:56
down to Celtic supporters over this
12:58
point is a joke. And Hugh Kevens well
13:01
Hugh Evans does what Hugh Kevens does.
13:03
He just talks down Celtic at every
13:05
opportunity as we've proven over the
13:06
years. I don't know why certain fans
13:09
this show. I wish they would stop.
13:12
Thanks for watching and please don't
13:13
forget to like, subscribe, and share if
13:17
you enjoyed this video.
#Sports News
#Social Issues & Advocacy