Members of Congress admit that lawmakers use nonpublic information that only they have to make incredibly profitable stock trades.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
This is an undisputed fact on Capitol Hill
0:03
Members of Congress use non-public information that only they have to make incredibly profitable stock trades
0:10
It makes some lawmakers sick of the place. Everybody talks about this place being a dadgum swamp
0:14
It's not a swamp. A swamp is something cool God created. It filters water, animal life lives and flourishes around it
0:22
This is a sewer. This is created by man, and it needs to stop
0:26
It's natural to say if someone is making stock trades with non-public information
0:33
isn't that insider trading? Thanks to an SEC technicality, it's not. But bipartisan rank-and-file members are pushing to make that illegal
0:41
It's well known that one of the most prolific traders on Capitol Hill is Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi
0:47
Thanks to some extraordinarily well-timed investments by her venture capitalist husband, The family is worth an estimated $278 million
0:57
That why one of the bills to ban stock trades and ownership is called the Pelosi Act She got access to information just like other members of Congress that the public doesn And technically that not insider trading
1:09
So it probably isn't illegal, but it ought to be. And we ought to ban it
1:13
Hulley is correct. Even if members of Congress are making stock trades with information they obtained because of their position
1:19
that's probably not insider trading. The SEC defines an insider as company officers, directors, or 10% stockholders
1:28
or anyone who possesses inside information because of their relationship with the company
1:33
It also applies to people who get a tip. The trade must also be based on material, non-public information
1:39
That includes changes to forecasted earnings, loan defaults, mergers and acquisitions, and new product announcements, to name a few
1:47
Members of Congress get a lot of information we don't get, but it doesn't necessarily relate to specific companies
1:53
It has details on industries, the economy, and intelligence about world events
1:58
It still far more intel than the average American and even some stockbrokers have but based on that SEC definition of an insider they technically on the outside And if they get information that pertains to a specific company it often has to do with official government actions like a new contract
2:16
But although that's hard to find, and they certainly learn it first, it's public
2:20
When members are making decisions for how to vote on a bill, we should be thinking about what's best for the American people, not what is best for our investment accounts
2:27
and members of Congress have access to all kinds of inside information
2:31
that the average member of the public does not. So the opportunity for corruption is unacceptable
2:39
Members in the House and Senate are both continuing their push to get a stock trading bill approved
2:44
There's the Pelosi Act and the Restore Trust in Congress Act, which prohibits members of Congress and their families from owning or trading stocks and other securities
2:53
Neither of these bills have gotten beyond the first steps of the legislative process
2:56
Congresswoman Sarah Jacobs stated Congress and their families from owning and trading individual stocks then every member should too Jacobs is worth an estimated million thanks to her billionaire grandfather
3:15
who founded the tech company Qualcomm. By the way, this is the argument against a congressional
3:20
stock trading ban. This is a free market and people, we are a free market economy
3:26
they should be able to participate in that. Pelosi has since come out in support of stronger
3:31
ethics rules regarding stock trading in Congress, as long as it also applies to the president and
3:36
vice president. It's worth noting that Congress tried to stop this practice in 2012 when it
3:41
approved the Stock Act. They passed rules to prohibit members of Congress from making trades
3:46
based on information they receive on the job. Experts say it appears to have failed to stop
3:52
investments that may present a conflict of interest. But it does require disclosures for
3:57
trades over $1,000, and that has helped the public see exactly how entangled some members are in the
4:03
markets. I'm Ray Bogan for Straight Arrow News. For more unbiased reporting straight from our
4:08
nation's capital, download the SAN app
#news
#Politics
#Lobbying
#Public Policy


