Up next in 10
VCR technology changed entertainment. It let people watch television shows on their own schedules, it transformed the way movies were consumed forever, and it might just have indirectly given us Game of Thrones.
This episode of Throwback dives into the battle between VHS and Betamax, and explains the key role Mister Rogers played in keeping the VCR alive. Did adult movies really play a pivotal role in the so-called "Format Wars"? How did we end up with two competing formats that looked nearly identical on screen? And why did no one you know ever own a Umatic?
Subscribe here for new Mental Floss episodes every Wednesday: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpZ5qUqpW4hW4zdfuBxMSJA?sub_confirmation=1
Don't miss a video! Subscribe NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@MentalFloss?sub_confirmation=1
About Mental Floss:
Mental Floss is where curious people come for trivia-tastic information. Mental Floss produces lists of fun facts, debunks common misconceptions, and tells untold stories from history, science, culture and more.
Website: http://www.mentalfloss.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/mental_floss
Facebook: https://facebook.com/mentalflossmagazine
Copyright Notice: This video and YouTube channel contain dialog, music, and images that are property of Mental Floss. You are authorized to share the video link and channel, and embed this video in your website or others as long as a link back to this YouTube Channel is provided.
2025 Mental Floss
How VHS Beat Betamax & Changed Media Forever | Mental Floss
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Picture this. It's 8pm on a Sunday in 1985. Knight Rider is on NBC. But Murder, She Wrote
0:07
is about to start on CBS. Two thirds of American households will have to make an impossible
0:11
choice—David Hasselhoff or Angela Lansbury. The remaining third, though, will be kicking
0:16
back and watching both. How? By programming their Dual Tuner Video Cassette Recorder
0:21
or VCR, a miracle of magnetic tape that transformed how we watch television and movies forever
0:26
But when they first came on the scene, not everyone was a fan. In fact, a major motion picture industry leader said, quote
0:32
the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston Strangler is to the woman home alone
0:39
Yeah, it gets a bit dramatic. It's a story involving the Supreme Court, Mr. Rogers, Tom Cruise, and E.T.
0:45
and we are rewinding it all on this installment of Throwback. Welcome back to the series where we take a deep dive into some of the most fascinating
0:58
pop culture stories and events that you might remember from your childhood. I'm your host, Erin McCarthy
1:03
If you have any suggestions for what we should cover on the next episode of Throwback, leave them in the comments section below
1:09
Like most of you, I spent many hours wandering video rental stores, disappointed that the
1:13
My Little Pony movie was completely rented out and settling for Care Bears instead
1:16
There were no streaming options and no high-definition video. Buying a single videocassette could set you back $40
1:23
And because prices were largely driven by the rental market, movies on tape were usually
1:27
much more than that. That's right, Teen Wolf on home video would cost at least $100 in today's dollars
1:34
But we're jumping ahead. Here's how the history of home video really began
1:42
The advent of television in the American home in the late 1940s and its dramatic adoption
1:47
throughout the 1950s offered a whole new entertainment portal for Americans, who had grown accustomed
1:52
to radio as the medium of choice in their homes. Now they could watch comedies like I Love Lucy, westerns like Gunsmoke, and riveting
1:59
dog-driven dramas like Lassie, presuming they were in front of their sets when the shows
2:03
came on. If they weren't, they'd have to hope the network aired a rerun at some point in the future
2:07
Otherwise, you'd have to settle for a description from kids in school, coworkers, or your family
2:12
And while your kid brother acting out Lassie's climactic warning that Timmy had fallen in
2:16
the well was its own form of entertainment, it lacked the emotional resonance of the real thing
2:22
Electronics manufacturers knew consumers wanted a way to free themselves from a point in television
2:26
In the 1950s, companies like RCA were trying to crack the code of traditional video storage
2:30
The thinking was, if you could record audio on magnetic tape, why not video
2:34
Well, video footage requires much more data than audio and therefore needs to move much
2:39
more quickly around the tape heads in the machine. A company named Ampex figured out that instead of moving the tape around the heads at ridiculous
2:45
speeds, the heads themselves should spin. With that breakthrough, Ampex introduced the Mark IV in 1956
2:51
But there was a problem. The device was the size of a desk
2:55
It also cost $50,000, or about $500,000 in today's dollars. Not exactly an affordable holiday gift
3:02
One of the first practical television recording solutions for households was the CartraVision
3:06
which debuted in 1972. The CartriVision used 8-inch plastic cartridges that were inserted into a compartment on a
3:12
television console to record shows. The blank tapes were about $15 for about 15 minutes of recording time
3:18
So you'd need two to grab an entire episode of The Odd Couple, unless you wanted to shell
3:22
out nearly $40 for a tape with 100 minutes of recording time. You could also rent feature films like Dr. Strangelove or High Noon for between $3 to
3:30
$6 at participating retailers. You could only watch movies once, however, and that restriction wasn't on the honor system
3:35
The tapes couldn't be rewound on the machine at home, only on a special device in stores
3:40
CartriVision didn't take off. Not only was it a whopping $1,500 or almost $9,000 today, it was also hard to use
3:47
You needed two hands to program a recording, with one pressing a button while the other twirled a knob
3:51
When you did manage to perfect your ambidexterity and get it working, the picture quality was still poor due to a data-conserving recording process
3:59
Worst of all, you couldn't just buy the CartriVision by itself. That $1,500 bought you an entire television console, including the tube
4:06
On a sales floor, it looked like any other television, except it cost three times as much
4:11
By 1973, Cartrevision was done. Honestly, it was probably for the best
4:16
Because what was coming next was something the modest Cartrevision would never have been able to compete with
4:20
Two massive Japanese companies spending millions of dollars to outdo each other in a bid to
4:24
conquer the lucrative world of allowing people to watch movies in their underwear
4:31
It started peacefully. Both Sony and JVC recognized that television viewers wanted to engage in
4:38
time shifting, which allowed them to watch what they wanted, when they wanted. In fact
4:42
the companies, with a little help from Ampex, collaborated to launch a machine called the
4:46
U-Matic in 1971. The U-Matic was developed by Sony in concert with JVC and Matsushita
4:53
now known as Panasonic, in the hopes it could become a universal standard. Since you may
4:57
have noticed that no one you know has ever owned a U-Matic, you can probably guess that
5:01
there were problems. First, it weighed 59.5 pounds, which is about the same as an 8-year-old
5:06
Second there was the cost There a trend here of recorders selling for outrageous amounts of money The U went for about It almost today Because most people opted to buy say a lightly used mid car instead
5:19
the U-Matic went the way of the Ampex machine and was used mainly for commercial purposes
5:24
Sony and JVC knew they were onto something, but the machines needed to be much smaller
5:28
and so did the cassette tapes. And that's where things started to get tense. Both companies agreed a home video recorder should use magnetic tape about a half inch in width
5:36
But Sony founder Masaru Ibuka was more concerned about the size of the cassette itself
5:42
He told his engineers that blank tapes should be about the size of a paperback book. JVC, on the other hand, wasn't convinced that they needed to limit the size of the tapes
5:50
Their designers, including Yuma Shirashi, who was general manager of the Research and Development
5:54
division, thought the most important feature was recording time — at least two hours
5:58
That would be enough for a couple of television dramas, a movie, or at least a significant
6:02
chunk of a sporting event. If a cassette had to be a little bigger and the picture quality slightly inferior, well
6:08
that was a fair trade-off. Shizuo Takano, who is general manager of the video products division at JVC, didn't want
6:15
tapes of different sizes and lengths that would only confuse consumers. He wanted a worldwide standard
6:21
He knew it would take years for people to adopt the technology, even comparing it to
6:24
the steady growth of a bonsai tree. Both, he said, require years of unwavering commitment before bearing fruit
6:31
He also knew he'd need to cooperate with other electronics companies in order to get
6:34
the machines in more hands. This business of different tape sizes wasn't what he had in mind, and it complicated JVC
6:40
and Sony's relationship. After a year of intense discussion over cassette size and picture quality, the companies decided
6:46
they couldn't come to terms. They went their separate ways, setting the stage for an epic showdown between Sony's
6:52
Betamax and JVC's Video Home System, better known as VHS. Let's hit pause for a moment
7:02
Even though we all know who won the great format war of the 1980s, we shouldn't underestimate
7:07
the fact that early on, Sony was very confident in their Betamax system
7:11
Granted, they initially made the same mistake Ampex did, insisting that their recorder be
7:14
sold as part of an entire television console, the LV1901. Again, the price was steep—$2,295 or about $11,000 today
7:23
But Sony also had a cool advertising campaign lined up for the machine's U.S. debut in 1975
7:28
Thanks to the built-in timer and dual tuner, you could record shows on channels you weren't
7:32
even watching, or catch shows that aired when you weren't home. Normal people called this recording
7:38
In ads, Sony declared that users would be the controller and preserver of time, that
7:43
you would be free from the restrictions of time, and that you would be able to break
7:46
the time barrier. In other words, Sony opted for subtlety. Anyway, Betamax
7:52
Tiny tape of the future. Owing to sluggish sales of the combination television and recorder, Sony soon released
7:57
a standalone Betamax unit, the SL7200, which was a more reasonable $1,300, or almost $6,000
8:03
today. One personal loan or second mortgage later, and you've got yourself a tape recorder
8:08
In just three months at the end of 1976, Sony sold a respectable 15,000 units
8:14
But around the same time, JVC was announcing their VHS format in Japan. The tapes were about
8:18
30% larger, but they could record for two hours, compared to Betamax's one hour. They were
8:23
also happy to license their technology to other companies, like RCA. RCA recognized that sports fans would want to be able to record games running three hours
8:30
or more. They told Sony that an option to slow down the recording speed to get more out of a video
8:35
tape would be appealing to consumers. Sony ignored the suggestion, but JVC listened
8:41
Released in 1977, RCA's first VHS model, the VBT-200, allowed users to change the speed
8:47
getting up to four hours per $25 tape. There was a loss of picture quality, but sports fans didn't really care
8:53
They just wanted to see the whole game. Although both Betamax and VHS had roughly 240 lines of resolution each, which is about
8:59
a quarter the resolution of today's high-definition signals, Sony was able to convince video files
9:04
that Betamax had the superior picture. In truth, the difference in quality was minor, and on most televisions it would be hard to
9:10
tell the difference. Still, like audiophiles, video files wanted the best product possible, and in the late
9:16
1970s, a loyal following of Betamax users sprung up. They even had a name, Beta Heads, and a thriving community that corresponded by mail
9:24
Let's say you loved The Twilight Zone, but you missed a few episodes, like the one with
9:28
the kid who wishes people away in a cornfield. Solution? Pick up the Videophiles newsletter, a fanzine that circulated in the late 1970s and 1980s
9:37
that was focused on the burgeoning world of home video recording. In the classified ads, collectors could request certain episodes of television shows and list
9:44
the duplicates they had to offer in trade. Two Mary Tyler Moore Show episodes for one Outer Limits
9:49
Done deal. Once you struck up a pen pal relationship with another Betamax collector, you could even
9:54
keep trades going in the mail. Betaheads were serious aficionados. They subscribed to TV Guide from other regions so they could find out what shows were playing
10:02
around the country. They organized conventions in Ohio where they would daisy-chain their VCRs together so they
10:08
could get copies of desirable movies like Jaws or A Star is Born
10:12
Because there were already concerns over piracy, they kept the location of such events a secret
10:16
And if that sounds paranoid, well, it wasn't. Despite the billions of dollars they would eventually earn from the home video market
10:23
movie studios thought both Betamax and VHS were going to spell their doom In fact it was Motion Picture Association of America president Jack Valenti who compared the VCR to the Boston Strangler Yeah Jack was really really upset over videotapes
10:35
Thankfully, Mr. Rogers was around to put things in perspective. Both Betamax and VHS were designed with one purpose in mind
10:48
to allow consumers to create their own television schedules. But it became clear pretty quickly that
10:53
consumers wanted something else, too. They wanted to be able to watch major motion pictures at home
10:58
Remember, in the 1970s and early 1980s, movies on demand weren't really a thing
11:03
Sometimes studios re-released big hits and repertory theaters might screen older movies
11:08
but that still required heading out to the cinema. Unless the movie was licensed for
11:12
broadcast television or a paid channel like HBO, you probably weren't going to see it
11:16
One example? Star Wars. Released in 1977, it didn't come out on Betamax and VHS until
11:22
1982, and it didn't premiere on network television until 1984, after the two sequels
11:29
That's not to say that there were no at-home options. Laser discs were being released around this time
11:35
In 1979, DiscoVision had around 200 titles in their catalog from companies like Universal
11:39
Warner Bros., and Disney. The technology had one advantage over VCRs for the studios
11:45
You couldn't record on it, which meant that what the studio wanted you to watch was what
11:49
you were watching. This limitations might help explain why people largely ignored the format in favor of the VCR
11:55
Studios worried that beta heads would eat into ticket sales. Two of them, Universal and Disney, sued Sony in 1976
12:01
In addition to breaking the time barrier, Sony was accused of breaking copyright law
12:04
by allowing the copying and distribution of content. Universal and Disney wanted sales of the machines halted
12:09
The case went to trial in U.S. District Court in 1979, where the judge determined Sony was
12:14
in the right and that VCRs were fair use of the studio's content
12:18
People appealed, and two years later, the decision was reversed. That set the stage for a showdown in front of the Supreme Court in 1983 and 1984, where
12:26
the very idea of recording the A-Team was put on trial. That's where Fred Rogers comes in
12:30
During the proceedings, Mr. Rogers testified in defense of the VCR. Home recording machines, he said, allowed families to control how and when they watched television
12:39
Mr. Rogers also argued that people should be allowed to make their own decisions, like when to sit down and enjoy a show
12:44
It sounds like a bit of a fairytale ending, but in the end, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Sony and cited Mr. Rogers' comments in their decision
12:51
VCRs had non-infringing uses, they said, and programs could be taped for home use
12:55
The studios had wanted the VCR manufacturers to pay a royalty, as much as $50 per unit
13:00
plus a cut of tape sales to offset their projected loss of revenue. Instead, they had to face
13:05
a new reality. VCRs were here to stay. Well, VHS was. By the end of 1983, it was clear Betamax was on the ropes. Consumers had
13:14
purchased millions of VCRs, but roughly 70% were VHS. It turns out JVC and RCA were right about
13:21
longer-running tapes. Betamax eventually offered longer recording times, but by then it was too
13:25
late. People didn't care if tapes were bulkier, they just wanted to watch a movie at home without
13:29
having to change cassettes midway through. And now it was up to studios to figure out how to
13:33
make money doing it. Enter Tom Cruise. Not all studios were scared of VCR in the late 1970s
13:44
A man named Andre Blais was convinced people would want to view movies at home
13:48
He tried convincing studios, but only Fox was interested. Through Blais' company, Magnetic Video, they agreed to release 50 movies from their library
13:55
like The French Connection and The Sound of Music. Blais paid them $300,000 upfront and $500,000 annually, plus a royalty of $7.50 per tape
14:04
Then he sold the videos for around $50 to members of his Video Club of America, who paid
14:08
$10 to join. The business model worked. Fox actually bought Magnetic Video in 1979 and made Blade chief executive of 20th Century
14:16
Fox Video for a time. While the movies sold well, not everyone believed there was a market for high-priced films
14:22
People bought records because they liked hearing music over and over again
14:25
Would anyone watch Jaws 20 times? The answer is obviously yes, but not everyone agreed at the time
14:31
A man named George Atkinson believed it would be more appealing for consumers to rent movies
14:35
instead of buying them. Those 50 Fox releases? He bought them and opened up what's believed to be the first video rental
14:42
store, Video Station, in Los Angeles in 1977. Consumers paid a $10 rental fee per movie and
14:48
Atkinson cleaned up. He hired an office manager, stuck him in the bathroom where there was a phone
14:52
and began selling his business model to other people. The rental business would go on to become
14:56
a fixture of home entertainment. By 1985, more than 15,000 rental stores were in operation
15:02
By 1987, 37 million VCRs were in homes that rented an average of 8 movies a month. Instead
15:08
of costing over $1,000, the machines were now between $200 and $400, with some budget models
15:13
as low as $169. VCRs were so popular that they actually cut into the customer base for pay
15:18
channels like HBO and Showtime, which relied mainly on broadcasting hit movies. In 1984
15:24
HBO had 1 million new subscribers. In 1985, they signed up just 100,000 new viewers
15:30
According to a 1986 account, the Movie Channel, aka Showtime, tried to offset the losses by
15:35
encouraging VCR users to subscribe so they could tape movies For home viewing only of course HBO meanwhile decided to put more focus into original programming I hope it works out for them The rental business was the main reason video cassettes were so expensive
15:50
Studios believed people wouldn't buy an expensive videotape if they were only going to watch it once or twice
15:55
They also knew rental stores could rent the same tape dozens or hundreds of times over
15:59
So cassettes cost a bundle, up to $100 each. Studios wanted to make as much money as they could upfront, knowing they had no control
16:06
over what happened to the cassette once it was sold. But two studios thought there were actually two markets for VHS tapes. There was the rental market, which was booming
16:14
and what they called the sell-through market. If tapes were reasonably priced, then plenty
16:18
of people would opt to buy a movie outright rather than rent it, especially if it was
16:22
something they'd watch over and over again, like Disney movies. Disney offered animated classics at sell-through prices in 1986 and sold a total of 5 million
16:31
sets, including 1 million copies of Sleeping Beauty for the low, low price of $29.95
16:37
Paramount thought the strategy could work for adult movies, too. No, not those adult movies
16:43
And for the record, there's no evidence VHS succeeded because Sony disallowed explicit
16:47
movies on the Betamax format. Paramount offered Beverly Hills Cop and Indiana Jones and The Temple of Doom for $29.95
16:54
They sold about 1.4 million copies each. Market research, however, told studios that $19.95 was an ideal price point for consumers
17:03
That's when they'd seriously consider buying rather than renting. Paramount couldn't quite get the price down that low
17:09
What they did instead was partner with Pepsi to launch a major marketing campaign for the
17:13
1987 home video release of Top Gun, the naval fighter pilot training school drama starring
17:18
Tom Cruise that was the biggest hit of 1986. In exchange for running a 60-second diet Pepsi commercial at the start of the tape, Pepsi
17:25
would plug the movie in television ads. For $26.95, people could watch that beach volleyball scene as often as they liked
17:31
Top Gun went on to sell an impressive 2.9 million copies, and modestly priced tapes of popular
17:36
hits became common. But believe it or not, consumers couldn't always get instant gratification
17:41
E.T., which was released in 1982, wasn't available on home video until 1988 because
17:46
director Steven Spielberg was worried about privacy. Unless you caught one of the theatrical re-releases, E.T. fans weren't actually able to watch
17:53
the movie for most of the 1980s. When it was finally released, Universal made sure guards were posted at warehouses and followed
18:00
along when the tapes were being transported. It even had a special hologram on the packaging to discourage pirates
18:06
And while it was $24.95, a $5 rebate brought it down to that magical 1995 price point
18:11
It sold 14 million copies. Selling VHS tapes proved to be very lucrative, and not just for retailers like Walmart or
18:18
independent video stores. McDonald's got into the home video business in 1992, offering dances with wolves, dirty
18:25
Rotten Scoundrels, and Babes in Toyland for sale for $7.99 each at their 9,000 restaurants
18:30
At the time, Dances with Wolves was a rental title, retailing for $99.98. Even though McDonald's
18:36
only offered the movies for two months during the holiday season, they sold 10 million tapes
18:41
Enough to make them the third largest seller of videocassettes that year, behind Walmart
18:44
and Kmart but ahead of Blockbuster Video. Andre Blais had been right. People wanted to buy movies to watch over and over again
18:51
He probably didn't see movies being sold at the drive-thru window, though
19:00
Even though Jack Valenti dismissed VCRs as, and I quote, a parasitical instrument, they
19:05
wound up being very good to studios. By the 1990s, half of all studio revenue was from the home video market
19:11
But there was a big change. Once people had VCRs in their homes for years, the novelty started to wear off, and rentals
19:18
experienced a decline. Netflix kept pushing sell-through titles like Batman, which sold 13 million copies, and rushed
19:24
to release them outside of the holiday buying season. But the days of coming out of video
19:27
stores with an armful of rentals were history. All told, the format survived for about 20 years before DVDs began encroaching in 1996
19:36
DVDs offered better resolution in a smaller and more attractive disc format. Not even
19:40
something called D-Theatre, which offered a high-definition picture on a VHS tape, could
19:44
turn the tide. Sony for its part had finally thrown in the towel and started manufacturing VHS VCRs in
19:50
1988, although they kept making Betamax machines through 2002 and Betamax tapes through 2016
19:57
Funai Electric made what was reportedly the last ever VHS VCR in 2016, putting a bookend
20:03
on an era that began with an argument over tape sizes. Even though we now have thousands of movies available at our fingertips that can stream
20:09
immediately in high definition, VCRs aren't totally obsolete. horror movie fans have found that obscure titles are sometimes available only on VHS, and have
20:18
been known to pay a premium for vintage copies. Others are nostalgic for the days when we wandered through video stores, enticed by clamshell
20:24
cases or cardboard boxes that promised action, comedy, thrills, and romance. Maybe you'd pick up something you never thought you'd watch
20:32
Maybe you'd meet someone special in the new releases section. Or maybe you just liked having a VCR, so you'd never miss an episode of Knight Rider
20:40
It may seem clumsy and clunky today, but Sony was right. VCRs really did allow us to break the time barrier
#education