Keir Starmer won't stop migrant crime but he'll ban kids from seeing it on social media - Bev Turner

Welcome to News Originals with me, Bev, here in Washington, D.C.The inability of human beings to put down their mobile phones is destroying relationships and detonating families. Ask any parent of teenagers what causes the most conflict in their house, and I promise you they'll say it's the perpetual nagging of "Put that down!", the vanishing attention span, the boyfriend breakup that can't be left at the front door, and the school bully who now travels home in your child's pocket.We don't need a government to tell us these devices are harming our kids. We are painfully aware of it. But Starmer's social media ban for under-16s will do nothing meaningful to address the addictive and destructive nature of these platforms. Kids will find workarounds. Parents will create fake accounts to stop the constant nagging. Some children will simply be allowed access to Snapchat because their parents want them to talk to their friends after school, as kids have always done.But be under no illusion. For all of us, this is the creaking open of the digital cage door, dressed up as a welcoming velvet rope.Just as narrative control once meant that arguing against unscientific lockdowns rendered you a "granny killer," arguing that this TikTok ban is wrong will now make you a "paedophile enabler." It does not.Every right-minded person wants children to grow up safely. The paedophiles won't disappear. They'll move to gaming platforms or other sites accessed through VPNs. They'll go back to hanging around school gates, as they did in the old days.If you have any imagination at all, and can see where this inevitably leads, you know that none of it is good. It will fundamentally change the relationship between the individual and the internet in the UK, potentially forever.The addictive nature of the algorithm is our true enemy. Call out the tech companies for that. Demand to see their research into targeted advertising.One of the most pernicious stories I've ever heard is that if a teenage girl takes a selfie and then deletes it, her phone can immediately serve up a makeup advert designed to catch her at her most vulnerable moment.So why is it up to me, rather than Keir Starmer, to tell you about that?Have you ever heard him criticising the tech bros whose own children rarely hold a smartphone? No, not really. That might make conversations around the Davos dinner table a little awkward.Do you feel that any politician has genuinely helped parents and children arm themselves against this influence through tools or apps that actually work?Not a single MP seems to be begging teachers to remove screens from classrooms and homework altogether, as they have done in Sweden.The antidote to staring at a wall, as one girl said in an interview today, is sport. It's music. It's drama. It's clubs. Invest in our teenagers if you genuinely want to get them out of their bedrooms.I freely admit that parents should not be left to fight the largest technology companies in the world on our own. It is not a fair fight.I tell my children that their phones are designed to make them addicted. It is up to them to develop the discipline to put them down and switch them off.And as parents, we must model that behaviour ourselves. Mealtimes with phones out of sight. Not constantly walking around with one in our hand. Charging them downstairs at night.It isn't easy. But good parenting has never been easy.The cost of this policy is so significant that it's no wonder Starmer is presenting it as a parting gift before he is potentially forced from office. He is, in my view, fulfilling the ambitions of a global surveillance framework championed by his allies at the UN, the WHO and the WEF.And if he can get this critical piece of digital infrastructure over the line, he'll likely walk into a very well-paid position at the NGO top table, because it is going to make a small number of people extremely rich.Let me ask you this:How do you stop a 13-year-old from using Snapchat without checking the 30-year-old as well?You can't.So every one of us is going to have our faces scanned.We are effectively cut-and-pasting the Australian model, a model many assume has already proven successful. Not necessarily. It was only implemented in December last year. It is far too soon to know whether it has had any meaningful impact on grooming, bullying, self-harm, poor mental health, or teenage wellbeing more broadly.Yes, there has been a measurable decline in child accounts. But how many of those users simply claimed to be adults and created new accounts?That doesn't prove children are safer.We can watch and learn from Australia. But we cannot pretend the experiment has already delivered a definitive verdict. It hasn't.Starmer described the ban as "a huge step for our country." He said it represents our values and forms part of a cultural transformation in how children grow up.But