What 385nm Actually Does! - Uniformation GK3 Pro Review - 385nm vs 405nm

0:00
All right, we've covered the GK3s,
0:02
and if you're thinking threes, yeah,
0:04
that's because there's two of them, not
0:06
including this one, the so-called Pro.
0:08
And that's what we're diving into today.
0:10
It's mostly the same, slightly
0:12
different, but those tiny changes do
0:14
give us some surprisingly different
0:15
results. So, join me as we uncover why
0:18
Pro is both the perfect name and
0:20
possibly completely the wrong name for
0:22
this machine. Hi, I'm Ross and this is
0:25
Farhammer Videos. Now, if this is your
0:27
first time watching one of my GK3
0:29
reviews, welcome. But I'm not about to
0:31
spend the next 20 minutes repeating
0:32
everything I said in my GK3's
0:36
review. You can watch that, too. And I'd
0:38
love it if you did because it goes into
0:40
way more detail. And another view, like,
0:42
and comment really helps the channel.
0:44
But for now, I'm just going to give you
0:46
a quick summary. So, with the GK3 range,
0:48
and that's not including the larger
0:50
Ultra, we've now got three nearly
0:52
identical machines with only a couple of
0:54
subtle differences. On the normal GK3s,
0:57
the nonpro versions that I covered in my
0:59
last video, one has a ball screw, the
1:01
other has a lead screw, also known as a
1:03
T-crew. The difference between those and
1:05
this Pro is that this has a ball screw
1:08
as standard with no T-crew option. But
1:11
more importantly, this Pro uses a 385
1:14
nanometer light source, where the
1:16
standard uses a more common 405. In
1:19
fact, this is one of only two printers
1:21
I've ever had that uses 385. and I'll
1:23
come on to show what that means later
1:25
on. Continuing the summary for now.
1:27
Outside, the lid design's decent, but
1:29
there's a weird VOC leaking gap that
1:31
shouldn't be there. USB port placement
1:33
is smart, but recessed too far for some
1:35
drives. I love the power button being
1:37
moved to the front, but they hid it
1:39
under a rotating plate. The build plate
1:41
is still one of the best. Great texture,
1:43
solid locking, and no need for faffing
1:45
with leveling, assuming you get yours
1:47
pre-leveled. If you don't, really easy
1:49
to do, and it'll never come unlevelled
1:51
again. The VAT's big, though. with the
1:53
resin pore spout makes pouring awkward.
1:55
They fixed the bill plate drip tray slot
1:57
kind of, but it's a bit of a bodgege.
1:59
The screen is 16K, 9.6 in, not 10 as
2:03
some brands claim. Great resolution, but
2:06
limited UV penetration due to new panel
2:08
trends. The real win of this whole range
2:10
is that the screen replacement is
2:12
stupidly easy, and that is a genuine
2:14
selling point versus something like the
2:16
Saturn or M7. And some standout features
2:19
include a decent internal heater, a
2:21
pre-built-in air filter with printable
2:23
exhaust, and the auto resin system,
2:26
which I personally won't use. It's also
2:28
got a webcam, and an app, which finally
2:31
lets you watch prints in real time. But
2:33
then there's the UI, which is still
2:35
basic. Overtheair updates don't work,
2:37
and the multi-exposure test is basically
2:39
useless in many scenarios. In the end,
2:42
it's a printer that exists. It works
2:44
great. It's got some great reasons to
2:46
buy it. It's just not smarter than its
2:48
competitors. In fact, it's genuinely
2:50
dumber. But it is more convenient in
2:52
some real ways. The build plate, the
2:53
app, live webcam, and that replaceable
2:56
screen specifically, they're standout
2:58
features, and that's true of all of the
3:00
GK3 machines apart from the Ultra. But
3:03
what does this 385 nm light source
3:06
actually mean? And what does it do?
3:08
Well, if I'm going to explain technical
3:10
stuff, I need to do it in a medium that
3:12
I am actually comfortable with. Crayons.
3:15
Hopefully my editor can turn these
3:16
scribbles into something halfway decent
3:18
on screen. But for now, let's keep it
3:20
simple, not because you can't handle the
3:22
detail because this stuff is easier to
3:25
get right when we strip it back. And if
3:27
you've got better info or want to
3:28
clarify something, please drop it in the
3:31
comments. We're all figuring this stuff
3:32
out together. So, when we talk about
3:35
wavelength, the wavelength is just the
3:37
distance between two peaks or two
3:39
troughs in an energy wave. 385 nanometer
3:43
light has a shorter wavelength than 405
3:45
nm, which means it squeezes more peaks
3:48
and dips into the same distance. And my
3:52
high school physics teacher, the
3:53
absolute legend, Mr. Grl, once called
3:56
this its jigability, and that stuck with
3:58
me since I was 13. And why does this
4:00
matter? Well, more jigability means 385
4:04
nm light burns out faster. It carries
4:06
more energy per photon, but it doesn't
4:09
travel as far. So, it doesn't penetrate
4:11
as deep as 405 nm. All right, settle
4:15
down. It's width that matters anyway.
4:17
And I've got neither. And I've still got
4:19
kids, so clearly it works, and that's
4:21
what matters. Now, yeah, that's a crude
4:23
analogy, but it fits. And unfortunately,
4:26
it also lines up far too well with how I
4:29
actually feel about the existence of
4:30
this printer, but we'll come back to
4:32
that in the conclusion. But the primary
4:34
benefit of this change is one that we
4:36
can clearly see when using transparent
4:38
resins. The difference is visible, but
4:40
again only when using transparent
4:42
resins. The more opaque the resin, the
4:45
less this matters visually. So whilst
4:47
it's technically doing something, that
4:49
difference becomes less and less
4:50
noticeable the more pigment your resin
4:53
contains. Now I need to mention that the
4:55
normal GK3 uses PFA release film with
4:58
its marketing name.
5:00
But on the Pro, you don't get PFA. It
5:03
comes with CPFA, which if you want, we
5:06
should say stands for crap PFA, but it's
5:08
just a marketing word that Uniformation
5:10
have since admitted it's ACF. And
5:13
they've explained that this is a newer
5:15
ACF with a finer grain, but yeah, you
5:18
still get the surface texture just like
5:19
you would with ACF. And maybe that's not
5:22
a huge issue for you if you're printing
5:24
bigger models and you don't really need
5:26
a perfect smooth surface or if you're
5:29
printing with transparents because if
5:31
you want that glass-like texture, you're
5:33
going to need to clear coat them anyway.
5:35
And I've got a separate video on that if
5:36
you want to follow along and get
5:38
glass-like results from any clear resin.
5:40
But to really show off the difference in
5:42
penetration depth, Uniformation have
5:44
created several samples which have
5:46
cavities within solid objects. So, the
5:49
idea is with a reduced penetration
5:50
distance, there'll be less bloating in
5:52
the GK3 Pro printer. So, we'll be able
5:55
to see those internal structures because
5:57
they won't be filled in by the UV light
6:00
penetrating as deep. And yeah, you can
6:02
see it. If you're specifically after
6:04
something like this application in resin
6:06
printing, that's the difference. Less
6:08
bloating on transparent resins. And I
6:11
need to stress again, this is only on
6:14
transparent resins. The more opaque your
6:16
resin is, the less of an impact this
6:18
penetration depth will have. Now, to
6:21
cover my ass, because I am still new to
6:24
this, I will also say that there's an
6:25
argument for resins cured with 385 nm
6:28
lights being tougher, but I expect that
6:31
just like the penetration depth is a
6:33
minimal amount. In my hands-on
6:36
experience, I haven't noticed models
6:38
printed in normal resins break any
6:40
differently to ones printed on 405
6:43
nanometer resins. And to be clear, all
6:46
of this was done with the settings
6:47
Uniformation told me to use. But I've
6:50
also printed exposure tests on both
6:52
machines which are both balanced. I've
6:54
got another video on balanced exposure,
6:56
meaning perfect exposure, and why that's
6:58
not great, but why this works. Again,
7:00
check that. But this is enough to tell
7:02
me that yeah, I'll happily concur that
7:04
the settings uniformation provided are
7:06
solid for what we're trying to achieve.
7:08
But going back to the ACF release film
7:10
you get on these printers and why
7:12
uniformation of advised that this is
7:14
needed. Apparently, it's because the 385
7:17
nm light source will actually make PFA
7:19
brittle much quicker and could reduce
7:22
its lifespan in upwards of 50%. And
7:25
that's because of its increased
7:26
jigability. And I just haven't printed
7:29
for long enough and don't have enough of
7:31
these machines to actually test this,
7:33
put it through its paces and verify it.
7:35
But I also know I have another printer
7:37
which has a 385 nm light source and that
7:40
uses PFA release film. And I haven't
7:43
changed the film on that in about a year
7:45
or so since I got it. The printer keeps
7:47
telling me to do so when it says it's
7:49
run out and I just keep lying to it and
7:52
saying I have. Shut up. And that's why
7:54
Skynet will come to hate us. But on that
7:56
other printer with PFA film, I've come
7:58
to my third round of release film
8:00
ignorance and it's still printing. But
8:04
then on the other hand, I also trust
8:05
Uniformation wouldn't just make this up
8:07
and promote something as a necessity on
8:10
their machine when it'll be seen as a
8:11
negative by so many people and they know
8:14
it will be. I've had that conversation.
8:16
But that's it. Now look, in summary, I
8:19
am sure this is a great printer, and I
8:21
even trust that 385 is a better light
8:23
source in general terms, but the
8:26
difference here is only really visible
8:28
on transparent resins. Now, that's not a
8:31
bad thing. Any incremental update is
8:32
still an update, but the benefit also
8:35
comes with a promoted drawback. And once
8:37
again, I'll use the term apparently, it
8:39
degrades the PFA film significantly
8:42
faster, which is why they ship it with
8:43
ACF instead. And that makes the whole
8:45
endeavor feel like one step forward, one
8:48
step back, and therefore we haven't
8:49
actually moved. And we had the same
8:52
thing when ACF came out. Yes, it's
8:53
faster, but it reduces surface quality.
8:56
And as many, many people have echoed
8:58
now, people don't want ACF. They get
9:01
resin printers for the best quality. If
9:04
ACF reduces it, then that's not a thumbs
9:07
up thing for the majority. And I have to
9:10
say, and this has been widely debated as
9:12
well, but in my experience, and I can
9:14
only talk about my experience, I see it
9:17
as a weaker material, too, as in it's
9:20
not as strong. It doesn't last as long.
9:22
I've already had this one tear a small
9:24
puncture in the time I've used it, which
9:26
led me having to replace my screen
9:27
protector. And I can promise you now,
9:29
this isn't because I tried to start a
9:31
print with loose cured resin in the
9:34
back. But yeah, here we're told we need
9:36
to use ACF because 385 wears out PFA too
9:39
fast. Again, we've gained more accurate
9:42
transparent prints, but again, we've
9:44
reduced surface quality. And that
9:46
reduction in surface quality extends to
9:48
everything else you print, too, not just
9:50
transparents. So, this does one job
9:53
really well, but it does other jobs
9:56
worse. So, if you're looking at getting
9:58
this, I think there's there's two
10:00
options. You can accept the surface
10:02
quality issue and print away. Fantastic.
10:04
Thumbs up. Crack on. Or you could
10:06
replace the ACF with PFA and accept that
10:09
you might need to replace your film more
10:11
frequently. And if you do that, please
10:13
let us know what it's like for you in
10:14
terms of lifespan. Is it any better or
10:17
worse than what you've seen before?
10:19
Because I think we do need some
10:20
community consensus on this topic. And
10:22
we need more brands chiming in, too. I
10:25
want to be clear and say I haven't
10:26
concluded my opinion on this light
10:28
source yet. I just don't personally see
10:30
a benefit for my use case, but I don't
10:33
use transparent resins very often. And
10:35
what I want is the smoothest surface
10:37
quality possible so I can prime and
10:39
paint my models immediately. So, this is
10:42
one I just want to put out to the
10:43
audience. I'm not the gospel voice on
10:45
this. My opinion is not everyone's. So,
10:48
more so than ever, I open the floor to
10:50
you. Do you see the benefit here? Do you
10:53
get more than what it takes? Will these
10:55
benefits apply to you? And why? or do
10:58
you feel like me that this is an upgrade
11:00
but with the drawback of release film
11:02
that cancels out the benefit? I
11:04
genuinely want you to tell me. But
11:06
either way, I think it's the naming and
11:09
approach to releasing this that I think
11:10
is a huge misstep from uniformation. I
11:14
do think Pro is the best name for this
11:16
device because well, very specifically,
11:18
I think it's mostly for manufacturing
11:20
and prototyping professionals who will
11:23
genuinely see a benefit in this light
11:26
source. But I also see it as the worst
11:28
name from a marketing standpoint because
11:31
I think general everyday users will see
11:33
pro and immediately assume better than
11:36
the non-pro version and buy it without
11:38
realizing that that there are some
11:40
drawbacks that need to be considered.
11:42
Drawbacks that may not matter to you
11:44
depending on what you're printing, but
11:46
things that you should know about
11:47
specifically around surface quality and
11:50
model scale. Now, personally, I think
11:53
all of them should have just been one
11:54
product, the GK3, and let you choose
11:57
385, 405, T-screw, or Ballcrew on a
12:01
single product page rather than making
12:03
two, well, technically three separate
12:05
products that likely just confuse people
12:08
more than drive sales. But honestly,
12:10
overall, I feel this is just the
12:13
incorrect product for Uniformation to
12:15
have pushed to YouTube creators because
12:17
I genuinely don't think that the people
12:19
who would be tangibly getting the
12:21
benefits out of this machine are
12:23
watching YouTube hobbyist videos for
12:25
their buying choices. And the majority
12:27
probably aren't buying uniformation
12:29
printers in lie of things that are much,
12:32
much more expensive. But hey, I could be
12:35
wrong. I often am. I was wrong about
12:37
something 20 minutes ago, but I am
12:39
married after all. In all seriousness,
12:41
if you do fully understand the benefit
12:43
of 385 nanometer and specifically you've
12:46
been looking at buying a more budget
12:48
friendly 385 nm resin printers, please
12:52
tell me why in the comments. But for
12:54
now, I'm going to come back to my
12:55
earlier analogy and just say, "Yeah, the
12:58
normal GK3 doesn't penetrate as deep,
13:01
but it works just fine." But if you do
13:04
decide to buy this one, I'd expect it's
13:06
because you want a GK3 thanks to the
13:08
easily changeable screen and the other
13:10
two models are just out of stock. And if
13:13
you do buy and this video has helped you
13:15
at least expect what you're getting for
13:17
your money, then I'd appreciate you
13:18
using my affiliate links in the
13:20
description before your purchase. That
13:22
nets me a commission at no cost to you
13:24
and is genuinely how I fully afford to
13:26
run this channel. You know, by eating
13:29
and staying alive. But above all else, I
13:32
want to say thanks for watching. A like,
13:33
a comment, or hitting subscribe goes a
13:35
long way. And you could also join our
13:37
members who are on screen now, who get
13:39
early access, Discord rolls, some
13:41
exclusive videos, mostly of me waffling.
13:43
But until next time, I could do
13:45
something heroic, but I've just put a
13:47
pizza in. Fauxhammer out.
13:54
[Music]

What 385nm Actually Does! - Uniformation GK3 Pro Review - 385nm vs 405nm

fauxhammer.com

A Shower, Not a Grower – Bambu Lab H2C Review

Cheap at What Cost? – Elegoo Centauri Carbon 2 Combo Review

Why I’m Done With Creality

E3D Making F'Uge Changes in 2026 - Education in Three Dimensions at FormNext 2025

The Other Half of Concepts 3D - Athena II Pro at FormNext 2025

Materials over Hardware - Heygears at FormNext 2025

GatlingTommy - 3D Printed MOAB Nerf Blaster GatlingGun at FormNext

Well, This Was a Choice... - Phrozen Arco Review

The TRUTH About This Laser - xTool F2 Ultra UV Review

Creality Spark X-I7: Evolution or Confusion? #shorts

Voice reply 10 Jan 2026

Voice reply 10 Jan 2026

Voice reply 10 Jan 2026

Voice reply 10 Jan 2026

Voice reply 10 Jan 2026

Up next in 10

What 385nm Actually Does! - Uniformation GK3 Pro Review - 385nm vs 405nm

fauxhammer.com