Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the federal judge, Tanya Chutkin
0:06
in the case, the DC criminal case of former President Donald Trump
0:10
has issued a massive ruling that's absolutely gonna shake up the case
0:14
Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:19
Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow
0:23
So, the judge in this case, originally had set a deadline for some time this week
0:29
for there to be a hearing over the protective order that Jack Smith is seeking
0:34
against former President Donald Trump. Now this protective order, if you've watched my videos before, I've explained it
0:39
If you're new, I'll explain it real quick again. This protective order is not your typical protective order where you're worried about somebody coming to hurt you
0:47
This protective order would stop Trump from revealing certain things about the evidence in his case
0:55
So, the Trump team said, look, one of our attorneys is not available this week
1:00
Can we just have the hearing next week? A simple request. Jack Smith's team said, we're available all week, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, when you want to do it
1:07
Meaning this week. The judge, once again, in this becoming a pattern here, sided with Jack Smith
1:16
and set the hearing date for Friday. So, she'll hear the evidence on Friday from Smith's team, from Trump's team about a protective order
1:24
Now, of course, Trump's team does not want a protective order. Why? Because the argument is it limits his First Amendment rights
1:30
And I tend to agree with that argument. Because you're going to have people in the news media, his opponents on the Democrat side
1:37
his opponents on the Republican side, attacking him over this case. And as they're attacking him, they're going to be casting aspersions about the case
1:46
They're going to be giving their opinions on the case. And then you're telling him he can't respond to that
1:51
That, to me, is crazy. That does seem to limit his First Amendment rights, as far as I'm concerned
1:57
And I think this judge is proving time and again that she's going to side with Jack Smith's team
2:03
in terms of not postponing things. Obviously, you know, Trump's team wants to kick the can down the road a little bit, right
2:09
Because they don't want to have to deal with this right now. They want to get to the election first
2:15
Well, Smith's team and the Democrats really want this to hurry up, because they would love a conviction before the election
2:21
And, you know, Washington, D.C. is as good a place as any to get a conviction
2:25
if you're looking to convict a Republican, right? So I think that, you know, the preponderance of all this put together
2:32
this does not bode well for Trump. I think when you see what this judge keeps doing
2:38
that this is going to be a tough, tough case for Trump. I think you have that with the D.C. jury that I'm not certain can give him a fair trial
2:45
and he's not certain can give him a fair trial. And I think you have all the ingredients for a hurricane, basically
2:52
of bad news for former President Trump. And I pray I'm wrong. I pray I'm wrong
2:58
But I've often told you guys the evidence doesn't matter as much as the jury and the judge matter
3:04
And the case, the solidity of the case doesn't even matter as much as the judge and jury matter
3:10
Do you guys think this judge is going to give him a fair shake? Let me know in the comments
3:14
Also, please remember to like, share, and subscribe, because that really helps us out
3:18
I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody
#Government
#Legal
#Politics


