Adam Schiff Just Got Served - $16 Million Fine For Russia Collusion Investigation
Jul 27, 2024
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Read The Story: https://explainamerica.com/4265306/
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey everybody, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Adam Schiffstorm
0:05
Well, he just got hit with a Schiffstorm. Folks, before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
0:12
Those little things really help us out and help our channel continue to grow. So, young, new Republican firebrand Anna Paulina Luna just hit Adam Schiff between the eyes
0:24
So, last week, last week, and something new just happened, but I'm going to get to last week first
0:30
Last week, she introduced a resolution that would remove Adam Schiff from the House of Representatives
0:36
Give him his walking papers, send them packing, down the yellow brick road
0:40
all because of the nonsense he made up about Russian collusion. See, Adam Schiff claimed for a long time that he had evidence of Russian collusion
0:48
but now we know that that was nonsense. He doesn't have any evidence of Russian collusion, or he would have showed it by now
0:55
So, she introduced that last week. This week, however, she introduced a different resolution
1:01
and this resolution, if it's voted on and approved, would punish Adam Schiff to the tune of $16 million
1:10
A $16 million fine, or half of what it cost for the Russian collusion investigation
1:16
Now, Luna says that he was a big proponent of it, and that's why he should pay for it
1:22
Don't believe her? Well, take a look at this. But we do know this
1:26
The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help, the Russians gave help, and the president made full use of that help
1:33
And that is pretty damning, whether it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy or not
1:38
Do you know of any instance where the Russians said, we're going to do it this way, we're going to do it through Wikileaks
1:42
we're going to do it through DC Leaks, this is how we're going to get this information out there? I can't comment. That is an issue that we have been investigating
1:51
and I don't want to comment at this point or not what the state of that evidence is
1:55
I got to ask you something that you said also to me on Sunday, is that you took, you thought that at the time
2:01
former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was too definitive when he said no evidence of collusion
2:09
at the time that he served through January, essentially January 20th of this year
2:14
What basis can you feel confident saying that, that the Director of National Intelligence oversold something
2:23
Well, look, I don't think it was deliberate on the Director's part, but all I can tell you is, reviewing the evidence that I have
2:32
I don't think you can conclude that at all, far from it
2:36
But you admit all you have right now is a circumstantial case
2:41
Actually, no, Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that
2:45
and I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now
2:49
So, again, I think Director Clapper... So you have seen direct evidence of collusion
2:55
I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial
3:01
and is very much worthy of investigation. We will be putting together a report that we'll set out for the country
3:08
what evidence we have seen today, what evidence we have seen in terms of the Russian hacking and dumping operation
3:13
what evidence we have seen in terms of the Russian social media campaign, their paid media campaign
3:18
and, yes, the issue of collusion with the Trump campaign. There is significant evidence
3:23
much of it in the public domain, on the issue of collusion. Now, you'll notice he always says he can't talk about it
3:29
He can't tell you about the evidence he has. But he has it. You've got to trust him
3:34
You've got to believe him. And he has it. You've got to trust him
3:39
You've got to believe him. And now, that might cost him $16 million
3:44
and it couldn't happen to a nicer guy, folks. I would love to see this resolution get passed
3:51
and see him hit with a $16 million fine, because it would show other people in the future
3:55
that it's not okay to lie just because you're an elected representative
3:59
or an elected senator, or an elected president. It's not okay to just blatantly lie and besmirch someone
4:04
and defame them, and ruin their reputation, just because you don't like them
4:08
In fact, I think President Donald Trump should sue Adam Schiff for millions of dollars, and I'm surprised he hasn't
4:13
I'm stunned he hasn't. Folks, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
4:18
Again, we really appreciate it, and I really want your comments on this
4:22
Should Schiff be removed from the House? Should he have to pay $16 million
4:26
I want to hear from you guys. We love you. God bless you
4:30
Take care, everybody. Thank you
#Legal
#Politics
#World News


