Adam Schiff Just Got Served - $16 Million Fine For Russia Collusion Investigation

Hey everybody, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Adam Schiffstorm

Well, he just got hit with a Schiffstorm. Folks, before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and help our channel continue to grow. So, young, new Republican firebrand Anna Paulina Luna just hit Adam Schiff between the eyes

So, last week, last week, and something new just happened, but I'm going to get to last week first

Last week, she introduced a resolution that would remove Adam Schiff from the House of Representatives

Give him his walking papers, send them packing, down the yellow brick road

all because of the nonsense he made up about Russian collusion. See, Adam Schiff claimed for a long time that he had evidence of Russian collusion

but now we know that that was nonsense. He doesn't have any evidence of Russian collusion, or he would have showed it by now

So, she introduced that last week. This week, however, she introduced a different resolution

and this resolution, if it's voted on and approved, would punish Adam Schiff to the tune of $16 million

A $16 million fine, or half of what it cost for the Russian collusion investigation

Now, Luna says that he was a big proponent of it, and that's why he should pay for it

Don't believe her? Well, take a look at this. But we do know this

The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help, the Russians gave help, and the president made full use of that help

And that is pretty damning, whether it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy or not

Do you know of any instance where the Russians said, we're going to do it this way, we're going to do it through Wikileaks

we're going to do it through DC Leaks, this is how we're going to get this information out there? I can't comment. That is an issue that we have been investigating

and I don't want to comment at this point or not what the state of that evidence is

I got to ask you something that you said also to me on Sunday, is that you took, you thought that at the time

former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was too definitive when he said no evidence of collusion

at the time that he served through January, essentially January 20th of this year

What basis can you feel confident saying that, that the Director of National Intelligence oversold something

Well, look, I don't think it was deliberate on the Director's part, but all I can tell you is, reviewing the evidence that I have

I don't think you can conclude that at all, far from it

But you admit all you have right now is a circumstantial case

Actually, no, Chuck. I can tell you that the case is more than that

and I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now

So, again, I think Director Clapper... So you have seen direct evidence of collusion

I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial

and is very much worthy of investigation. We will be putting together a report that we'll set out for the country

what evidence we have seen today, what evidence we have seen in terms of the Russian hacking and dumping operation

what evidence we have seen in terms of the Russian social media campaign, their paid media campaign

and, yes, the issue of collusion with the Trump campaign. There is significant evidence

much of it in the public domain, on the issue of collusion. Now, you'll notice he always says he can't talk about it

He can't tell you about the evidence he has. But he has it. You've got to trust him

You've got to believe him. And he has it. You've got to trust him

You've got to believe him. And now, that might cost him $16 million

and it couldn't happen to a nicer guy, folks. I would love to see this resolution get passed

and see him hit with a $16 million fine, because it would show other people in the future

that it's not okay to lie just because you're an elected representative

or an elected senator, or an elected president. It's not okay to just blatantly lie and besmirch someone

and defame them, and ruin their reputation, just because you don't like them

In fact, I think President Donald Trump should sue Adam Schiff for millions of dollars, and I'm surprised he hasn't

I'm stunned he hasn't. Folks, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Again, we really appreciate it, and I really want your comments on this

Should Schiff be removed from the House? Should he have to pay $16 million

I want to hear from you guys. We love you. God bless you

Take care, everybody. Thank you