FDA set to issue first federal definition of ultra-processed food: Report

Have you ever wondered if your favorite cereals and snacks qualify as ultra-processed

You may soon have that answer as the FDA is set to define what qualifies

as ultra-processed food for the first time in history. The FDA told the New York Times of the anticipated change Tuesday

Currently, nutritionists broadly define ultra-processed foods as products created in an industrialized process

Basically, not anything you can make with the help of a stove, air fryer, or pressure cooker, or other methods in your home

These products can also include ingredients like artificial sweeteners, dyes, high-fructose corn syrup, chemical preservatives, and hydrogenated oils, ingredients that aren't likely in your cabinets individually

The FDA's definition could set the stage for transforming what kids eat in schools

what former and current military service members are served at VA hospitals

and military installations, as well as what's for dinner in prisons. The change could also modify U.S. dietary guidelines, impacting what is covered by SNAP benefits

The Times reports the FDA and USDA will be seeking public comment before deciding on a definition

The agencies did not give an exact timetable for the rollout. The commissioner of the FDA tells the Times the definition may have companies labeling products as non similar to how they use reduced sugar low sugar and no added labels to draw in customers He says the goal is not to outlaw processed foods rather to inform

consumers and encourages companies to compete based on health. The push comes as a number of

states look to regulate ultra processed foods, including Texas, West Virginia, and Arizona

who have targeted dyes and ultra processed products through legislation. Doctors also warn

eating ultra-processed foods is linked to increased risk of cancer, heart disease, stroke

diabetes, and stomach problems. The FDA's deputy commissioner says the agency will look into the

use of emulsifiers, artificial dyes, and preservatives as a way to define what is ultra-processed

Nutritionists predict the move will be met with resistance from companies who use ultra-processing

to produce cheap foods in a short amount of time in large quantities. They also warn against a

broad definition that demonizes foods that aren't harmful to people, while also noting too narrow of

a focus risk excluding potentially harmful ingredients. Instead, they say the definition

must be refined and well-crafted to ensure it encompasses the health risks associated

with consuming ultra-processed foods. If done right, health academics say the new definition

could be used in new warning labels or to determine which products may continue to be

marketed to kids. For more on this story, download the Straight Arrow News app or visit

san.com. For Straight Arrow News, I'm Kaylee Carey