0:06
hi everyone I'm Kell ooro and this is
0:09
adaptable Behavior explained hi
0:12
everybody thank you so much for tuning
0:14
in today to our show adaptable uh we're
0:17
going to talk today about divorce the
0:19
kinds of divorce that people get and
0:21
most importantly some of the choices
0:23
that we can make to make it the least
0:25
adversarial and least traumatic
0:27
experience that that that can be divorce
0:30
inherently is not a fun process and so
0:33
with us today I have uh my esteemed
0:36
colleague her name is Diane solivan she
0:38
is a family law attorney and uh she's
0:41
got a bunch of other feathers in her cap
0:43
related to why she's an excellent choice
0:45
to have as a guest on our show today and
0:47
so I'm so grateful for you being here
0:50
today and I would like you to just
0:51
introduce a little bit more about
0:53
yourself and and who you are and why
0:55
this is a a topic that you felt
0:58
passionate about sharing with our
0:59
audience well like you said my name is
1:01
Diane I'm a family law attorney um I've
1:03
been an attorney probably about 25 years
1:06
now um I am was a former judge I sat on
1:10
the criminal bench for approximately 16
1:12
years um I was a prosecutor I was a
1:14
domestic violence prosecutor um I did
1:16
criminal defense so I've basically had
1:18
the rare privilege to wear every hat in
1:22
the courtroom and what I've seen with
1:24
people going through a divorce is that
1:26
it's like you said not a fun process not
1:29
an easy process process for people to go
1:30
to and I found that as attorneys if we
1:34
can just learn to meet people where they
1:37
are um in their process in their moment
1:40
in their emotions we can just do be so
1:43
much more helpful in this in this
1:46
process right well and it's so traumatic
1:48
in nature generally speaking because
1:50
we're going to suffer a loss uh you know
1:52
we have to think about the picture that
1:54
we had when we chose to get married and
1:56
what we wanted to have as far as our
1:58
life and our future and then we have to
2:00
grieve the loss that this is not going
2:02
the way that we wanted and so it's it's
2:04
traumatic in nature for most of us if we
2:06
go through a divorce um can you tell me
2:09
a little bit why what your understanding
2:12
about trauma and why you know so much
2:14
about trauma well I know so much about
2:16
Trauma from my own Journey um I have
2:19
complex post-traumatic stress and I
2:21
started my own work and I once I had
2:26
that kind of information and that kind
2:28
of healing and that kind of recovery I
2:30
thought how do I not pay this forward to
2:33
people in general but especially my
2:35
clients so I I tell my clients when they
2:38
meet with me the first time our office
2:40
is holistic we do things differently I
2:42
mean we not only will we will get you on
2:44
the other side of your divorce or or
2:46
custody case I said but we talk about
2:48
healing we talk about mental health we
2:50
talk about self-care we talk about
2:53
making sure that we are understanding
2:55
all of your questions and meeting all of
2:56
your needs I found that that really gets
3:00
rid of at least 50% of people's anxiety
3:03
just that they know the process there's
3:05
someone to walk them through it to
3:07
answer questions that in of itself
3:09
really helps sure well and being heard
3:11
but but I can't imagine in law school
3:13
you guys get very much training on
3:15
mental health and how to show up for
3:17
somebody related to mental health so how
3:20
how have you learned that piece yeah we
3:21
we get none um I have a I have a uh uh
3:25
my bachelor degree is in Behavioral
3:26
Health so that that gave me at least a
3:28
foundation but but there's as attorneys
3:31
you just really have to have the
3:33
wherewithal to get that education um we
3:36
often as attorneys get very stressed out
3:38
by our clients because we feel like
3:40
they're not listening to us they're not
3:42
getting us what we need to help them win
3:45
or get the result that that they want
3:48
and what I found is that that's mostly
3:50
our fault because we're not meeting them
3:53
where they are so not only do you have
3:55
clients showing up better and more
3:57
receptive to what you're saying you as
3:59
an attorney you're not getting as
4:00
stressed out because your clients
4:02
actually hear what you're saying and can
4:04
show up as the best them to help you get
4:08
what they want in their case right well
4:10
and I imagine that if someone isn't in
4:13
their prefrontal cortex because they're
4:15
flipped out and they're they're
4:17
triggered because of whatever they're
4:18
going through it's not even maybe that
4:20
they don't want to get you or they don't
4:21
want to be cooperative it's that they
4:23
are not online to take in the
4:26
information you're asking because
4:27
they're so emotionally distraught and
4:30
and um simply can't they can't they
4:32
can't digest what you're asking them to
4:34
do and so you having more awareness
4:36
about where the client is and and like
4:38
you said meeting them where they are so
4:40
that they can um you know you might need
4:43
to repeat it or go hey like I don't know
4:46
that that got in can you can you share
4:48
back with me what I need you to do
4:50
before we meet again just to get us all
4:51
on the same page and you might have more
4:53
understanding about what that looks like
4:55
because of what you're talking about
4:57
today I I can't imagine many lawyers are
4:59
that in tuned uh in tune about this yeah
5:03
not not a lot of us are like I said it
5:05
takes the initiative to get this kind of
5:08
an education just like we as lawyers are
5:10
not taught how to run businesses either
5:11
it's something that therapists exactly
5:14
no idea and we're not getting n MBA
5:16
somewhere it's you know it's it's either
5:18
it's additional post law school training
5:21
so especially as family practitioners
5:24
that's just it it it's so important and
5:26
how I describe a client self-care and
5:28
meeting their own mental Health needs
5:30
it's is I tell them the the reason's
5:31
twofold why I'm such a proponent of it I
5:34
said one is purely selfish I said I want
5:37
to get you the result you want I want to
5:40
win you're you're your case fore people
5:41
understand the winning analogy I I said
5:44
so I need the best you I can't do it by
5:46
myself I need the best give us so many
5:48
referrals yes exactly I said that's the
5:50
selfish reason I said The more selfless
5:53
reason is I I'm human you're human I
5:55
said I have this information I know how
5:57
life-changing good mental health care
6:00
how do I not pass that on to every human
6:03
not just I see that you have a rock in
6:04
your shoe I can just watch you walk
6:06
around on it or I can say you know you
6:07
could get that rock out of your shoe and
6:09
help you know regulate your emotions so
6:11
you can show up when your best best self
6:14
so what kind of law do you practice I
6:16
practice what falls under the umbrella
6:18
of family law most people don't know
6:20
what that entails a family law is
6:22
divorce is um legal separation things
6:25
like en nment so all basically different
6:27
ways to end or uh SE seate a marriage um
6:31
child what we used to call custody we
6:33
don't call it that in Arizona anymore
6:35
but most people understand the word
6:36
custody um perhaps you you haven't been
6:39
married but you have children together
6:40
how do we navigate that now that we're
6:42
not um in any kind of relationship
6:44
together um things what used to be
6:47
called grandparents rights we lawyers
6:48
have to call everything fancy so we call
6:51
it in Latin it's called inoco parus
6:53
rights it's basically any kind of
6:54
thirdparty Rights um over a child that's
6:57
considered family court is that how that
6:59
works so like if if if parents didn't
7:01
have a will or any guardianship
7:03
indicated if they were both in a car
7:05
accident at the same time is that where
7:06
grandparents have some inherent rights
7:09
if they stepped forward or is that not
7:11
how that works in that situation no
7:13
that's a guardianship that would go
7:14
through juvenile court but if you have
7:16
at least one living parent and there is
7:18
a third party regardless if there's a
7:20
biological relationship or not that
7:22
wants some sort of decisionmaking or
7:24
parenting time over that child that's
7:25
filed in Family Court okay yeah child
7:28
support spousal maintenance those all of
7:30
that falls under the umbrella of family
7:32
court so that's the kind of law that
7:35
you're dealing with is likely at least
7:37
somewhat contentious yes I mean you know
7:40
even the what we call a a nice a nice
7:43
case where it's uncontested it's like
7:45
you said earlier it's a traumatic event
7:47
even if people are are working together
7:49
amicably to reach an an an outcome that
7:52
they can both live with it's still
7:54
traumatic sure so so there's a lot of
7:57
Buzz going around about this term called
7:59
collabora divorce tell me a little bit
8:00
about what that is collaborative divorce
8:03
is a respectful outof Court private way
8:08
to get divorced when you say private
8:09
what's that mean it means that none of
8:12
the communications none of the what you
8:14
would referred to as evidence is is ever
8:17
made public record it is all done out of
8:20
court as part of a team and when I
8:23
explain this process to people they'll
8:24
usually say well we're we're splitting
8:26
up we're not together we can't do
8:27
anything as a team the team is your team
8:30
so all you as the parties have to do is
8:33
recognize okay we don't want this to
8:35
ruin our lives and our children and what
8:38
can we do to reach a resolution where
8:41
we're not at each other's throats and
8:43
get on the other side of this with some
8:45
respect for each other and love going
8:48
forward for our children okay and who
8:50
would be on that team as far as a
8:51
collaborative divorce is concerned it
8:53
depends the team can be as big or as
8:54
small as you want it so at minimum
8:56
there's two attorneys each party has an
8:58
attorney um there's things like a child
9:00
specialist That's on board that will
9:02
help people um craft a parenting plan
9:06
and a child you know uh sharing schedule
9:09
that works for them and works for their
9:10
children there's a financial neutral
9:13
which that person reviews all of the
9:15
parties finances and assets and helps
9:17
them come up with the best way to divide
9:19
those assets taking into account things
9:21
like um Taxation and taxable transfers
9:24
and things like that and and spousal
9:26
maintenance and all those things um
9:28
there can be a communication coach which
9:30
basically is going to teach people how
9:32
to just better communicate not only with
9:34
each other but their children so those
9:37
are usually the main players but there
9:39
can be mediators there can be uh
9:41
sometimes mental health professionals
9:43
sometimes okay we're going to have Mom
9:45
Andor dad's counselor be a part of this
9:48
collaborative process so what you you
9:51
mentioned mediation what what is
9:53
mediation and what's the difference
9:54
between that and for example a
9:56
collaborative divorce it's similar in
9:59
that it's an outof court process
10:01
mediation usually occurs when there is
10:04
um already a matter pending in Family
10:06
Court although you can't have
10:07
pre-mediation filing but that's usually
10:09
a yeah pre filing mediation um but
10:12
usually the difference is that there's
10:14
already a process going on but the
10:16
similarity is that you're working
10:17
together to reach a resolution that
10:20
works for both of you that you too had
10:23
ownership in crafting um and it's
10:26
usually so people who might get along
10:28
you know a little better but they've
10:29
just decided we shouldn't be married
10:31
anymore might be okay just using a
10:33
mediator yeah yeah and usually and
10:35
sometimes when you do a mediation
10:37
process sometimes each party still has
10:38
an attorney it it's not necessarily
10:40
something that you can't have an
10:41
attorney to do mediation uh the mediator
10:44
is a third party neutral I'm a trained
10:46
mediator so as part of my practice I
10:48
also act as the mediator um so you'll
10:51
have the mediator and you'll have both
10:52
the parties sometimes with lawyers
10:54
sometimes without lawyers and the
10:55
mediator helps them get to a resolution
10:58
sometimes that's a what we call a global
11:00
resolution meaning that's everything
11:02
we're fighting about everything on the
11:04
table we've resolved everything we're
11:05
going to put it in writing and file it
11:06
with the court sometimes it's what's
11:08
just called a partial resolution and
11:10
even that's fantastic so maybe just you
11:12
have 10 issues and eight you agree on
11:14
that's great right and maybe you just
11:15
have to have the court sa quite a bit of
11:17
money yes CU otherwise you're putting
11:19
whatever this is into a into a judge's
11:21
hands into a judge's hands who's known
11:23
you five minutes right it's it's it
11:26
would scare me right if I if I was in
11:28
that that process and both collaborative
11:30
divorce and and they're not mental
11:31
health trained at all judges are most
11:33
they not okay and most and they are not
11:38
approximately less than 10 hours of
11:41
family law training and sometimes they
11:43
already well into their judicial
11:45
appointment before they even receive
11:47
that training because it's only offered
11:48
twice a year wow so a lot of people
11:51
probably are very unaware that I'm going
11:53
to go through this process and I'm going
11:55
to trust the system to look out for my
11:57
best interest when in fact you you know
11:59
there's no way a judge wouldn't also
12:01
have bias around how they make a choice
12:03
because yeah you know as a mental health
12:05
professional everyone has bias right you
12:07
know judges are trained and I know many
12:09
judges being a judge myself they take
12:11
very seriously that role of being
12:13
neutral and judging the facts but it's
12:15
it's inherent and usually subconscious
12:17
and most judges don't have they they're
12:19
not Family Court they're not they've
12:21
never been family practitioners before
12:23
so well and you could I mean just from
12:25
what you're saying today it sounds to me
12:27
like collaborative divorce if you can if
12:29
you can get in agreement with the the
12:31
person you're divorcing would be the
12:33
best because at least then there's
12:34
people in with proper training that are
12:35
looking out for outcome you know whether
12:38
it's Financial or whatever and if we're
12:39
looking at being you know balanced
12:41
humans we want things to resolve in a
12:44
way that's the most reasonable and fair
12:46
and that you have ownership of that you
12:48
are part of that process agree and
12:50
disagree and whatever else well and how
12:51
I usually um sort of sell collaborative
12:54
to people is because again they're
12:55
saying we're not getting along We can't
12:57
agree to do that but most people can
12:59
they would like a faster less expensive
13:03
process okay sure want to save money and
13:06
not be doing this for and collaborative
13:08
and mediation are almost always quicker
13:12
and less expensive okay so you would say
13:14
that like that would be the best way to
13:16
get a divorce if you're like I we have
13:18
to do this absolutely okay and is that
13:20
only if you have children or is a
13:21
collaborative divorce still beneficial
13:23
if you don't even have children it and
13:25
it can be coll a collaborative process
13:27
doesn't even have to be divorced you
13:28
could have collaborative custody process
13:31
anything can be handled in that in that
13:32
collaborative so even after you've been
13:34
divorced could you get a collaborative
13:36
person to help you figure out better
13:38
custody based on okay what's the
13:40
difference between that and for example
13:42
a Kobe a CO Kobe is a court appointed
13:45
behavioral intervention so in a Kobe
13:48
process there has to be an avalable to
13:50
the court that there are no uh parental
13:52
Fitness issues there has to already be
13:55
whether it's a permanent or a temporary
13:57
parenting time order
13:59
and the goal of the Kobe is to get the
14:02
parties and the children to the point
14:04
where the children are being are that
14:07
order is being followed because normally
14:09
a Kobe process starts and you have
14:11
children that don't want to see one
14:12
parent that's normally how it starts the
14:14
Kobe's goal is to get the children back
14:16
to whatever the current custody
14:18
Arrangement is okay so let me ask you
14:21
this because I I just saw that a recent
14:23
house bill in Arizona came out have you
14:25
been familiarized with the uh I'm not
14:28
exactly sure what it is but uh maybe you
14:31
could speak more to that but essentially
14:33
this house bill prevents requiring
14:35
reunification with parents is this uh
14:38
what are your thoughts on this new bill
14:40
it it's actually very narrow and is
14:43
really just meant to prevent what I
14:45
always used to call the nuclear option
14:48
in Family Court I've only seen it happen
14:50
once or twice what do you mean when you
14:52
say a nuclear option and that is just my
14:54
catchphrase but basically what it means
14:56
is that if you have a situation where
14:57
one parent up where the children are not
15:00
seeing one parent you have the the
15:02
children who are with the one parent
15:03
that's called the favored or the aligned
15:05
parent aligned parent I see this from a
15:07
mental health angle and it's very hard
15:10
to do and then you have the other parent
15:11
that's the less favored I don't even
15:13
know what the term is but basically the
15:14
parent that's not seeing the the child
15:16
what the nuclear option was is is the
15:20
court ordering a 100% shift in parenting
15:25
time to the nonf favored parents and
15:29
giving either no visitation it's usually
15:32
no visitation for a short period of time
15:34
no contact no nothing with the favored
15:37
parent it's a complete just just shut
15:40
down of that parents what the thinking
15:42
behind that um formerly having do to
15:46
that is usually done in a case where we
15:48
think the alignment is happening because
15:50
of the favored parent not because of
15:54
abuse or something that is legitimately
15:56
happened to the child by the non allign
15:59
so I've seen this a couple of times I'm
16:01
wondering if that's not going to be a
16:03
requirement what is going to be the way
16:04
to solve for that because it's amazing
16:07
how children can become so aligned with
16:10
with the favored parent and how you know
16:13
every time I've seen it it's very
16:15
manipulative and it's so mentally toxic
16:18
and dysfunctional but if they don't hear
16:21
they don't know it or they're unwilling
16:22
to see that part of things you know what
16:25
how will we solve for this in the future
16:27
when it comes to a legal thing if that's
16:29
not how we try to solve for this you
16:31
know dis disrupting of that alignment
16:33
that's done maliciously whether it's
16:35
knowingly or unknowingly it is that Kobe
16:37
or that therapeutic process and I have a
16:41
case right now where this is similarly
16:43
what's going on and it's basically you
16:44
exhaust all of those options before you
16:47
ask the court be like all right you know
16:49
what I think maybe we need a change in
16:51
our parenting time order due to the
16:54
favored parents refusal to correct
16:58
either their behavior that that's
17:00
causing this or to be part of the
17:02
solution to reunify that child with the
17:05
other parent because you know as well as
17:07
I do sometimes it is a situation where
17:09
the favored parent doesn't really
17:10
understand the damage they're doing
17:12
right so they either need to be educated
17:14
and correct their behavior or that's
17:17
then when the court steps in right and
17:19
saying you're you know you're just not
17:20
getting it and this is causing damage to
17:22
the children that you're you're not
17:23
seeing yes right because ultimately if
17:26
we have good enough parents um you know
17:29
whatever that looks like whether it's a
17:31
man and a woman whether it's two men two
17:32
women because I don't want to exclude
17:34
any kind of family you know if we have
17:36
good enough parents it is in the
17:37
children's best interest to have time
17:40
that is not um that is not uh negatively
17:43
impacted by the time with by the other
17:45
parent it's best for the children and
17:47
that's how our law is written you know
17:48
it's a popular misconception people say
17:50
well Arizona is a 50-50 State well
17:52
meaning equal parenting time not really
17:55
our statute says it is in the best
17:56
interest of children to have substantial
17:58
and frequent parent par in time with
17:59
each parent all things being equal that
18:01
there's no drug issues that there's no
18:03
significant domestic violence that
18:05
there's no mental health issues that
18:07
either aren't being treated or are
18:09
impacting a parent's parenting right
18:12
that's that's really good to know I
18:13
think the timing of this show is is good
18:15
because I just saw this morning in our
18:18
um in our team our internal team
18:20
communication that that came out and so
18:22
I was like what's going to happen now
18:24
you know when we we had these as options
18:26
if we if we run into this so that's good
18:28
to hear that the Kobe will be sort of
18:29
the backup plan yeah and it's basically
18:32
and what what I think the legislature
18:33
was trying to prevent is from the court
18:37
ordering that kind of a process where
18:39
people don't have resources or one
18:41
parent doesn't want to participate okay
18:43
then the court shouldn't be forcing
18:45
participation but then at the same time
18:47
the court can say okay well if you're
18:49
not going to participate I will consider
18:51
that and then consider all of the facts
18:53
and the children's best interest when
18:56
deciding what should the parenting time
18:57
schedule be right which would likely
18:59
limit their time with the child because
19:01
if they don't want to be a parent then
19:03
they're not going to be a good one when
19:04
it is their turn exactly and and that's
19:06
why another reason why I stress these
19:08
outof Court Solutions it is family
19:10
courts not equipped it's it's not mental
19:12
health court it's not treatment Court
19:14
they have limited options limited things
19:17
that they even have the discretion to
19:19
order but with a mediation process or a
19:22
collaborative process you as parents can
19:25
agree on anything you want cuz it's your
19:27
children and you can put them first and
19:30
craft that agreement so it works for you
19:33
you are not getting a cut and paste say
19:35
holiday schedule right that's on the
19:37
judge's hard drive when because you
19:39
can't agree on one right you really want
19:41
a judge to tell you what Christmas you
19:42
can see your children right not me
19:44
that's that's really good to know so so
19:46
when in doubt when possible elect for a
19:49
collaborative divorce or collaborative
19:52
ways to process some of these
19:53
disillusions of relationships or custody
19:55
arrangements and and so on and so forth
19:57
at minimum you want your legal
19:59
representative to be either trained in
20:02
collaborative law trained in mediation
20:05
even if you don't do a collaborative
20:07
process even if you never go to
20:08
mediation because that attorney is going
20:10
to have that training to what can we do
20:13
to to get you an outcome that you can
20:16
live with that you've had some buyin
20:17
with that's best for your children our
20:19
answer is not always to go to court
20:21
that's the last option so how would we
20:23
find someone if we're looking um you
20:25
know for someone who's who's trained and
20:27
skilled enough in to do potentially a
20:29
collaborative situation I find referrals
20:32
are usually the best way to find an
20:33
attorney that'll be a good fit for you
20:36
um we in Arizona have a collaborative
20:38
attorney Association it's called
20:39
collaborative Professionals of Phoenix
20:41
where anyone who's had that
20:42
collaborative training is listed on that
20:44
website so at minimum you're getting
20:46
someone who's well-versed in an outof
20:48
Court resolution for your case um
20:51
honestly you want someone that's
20:52
obviously been practicing a while you
20:54
know so they you know obviously know
20:55
what they're doing um you know and
20:59
you can live with who who whose
21:01
personality you can handle exactly I
21:03
mean even a collaborative process is at
21:05
least a couple of months I've had
21:06
clients I've had for years so if you
21:08
have to spend Years with me we have to
21:11
get along not every an attorney not
21:13
every attorney even if they're a
21:14
fantastic attorney isn't a fit is a fit
21:16
for every client who walks in their door
21:18
and vice versa so can you interview for
21:20
example to try to find are we in
21:22
alignment are we going to have good
21:23
energy together um you can just
21:25
interview and is that called a
21:29
absolutely I I encourage people to do
21:31
that don't hire the first person you
21:33
consult with different different
21:34
attorneys are going to have different
21:35
approaches different strategies and if
21:38
you haven't met with more than one
21:39
attorney you can't even compare and
21:40
contrast who would be a good fit for
21:43
your case that makes sense that makes
21:45
sense so what are what are some good
21:46
questions to ask when interviewing an
21:48
attorney you know again like I I said
21:51
before what's your do you have any
21:53
training in collaborative law do you
21:55
have any you know sort of training in
21:57
mental health do you have um any kind of
21:59
training in mediation how long have you
22:02
been an attorney how long have you
22:03
practiced family law cuz you could be an
22:05
attorney for 30 years and only just
22:07
started practicing family law sure yeah
22:08
I don't think we know that most of yeah
22:10
so these are all good questions to ask
22:11
um you know there's no winning or losing
22:14
in family court it's not like if you're
22:15
a criminal attorney it's like what's
22:16
your win loss record because that's
22:18
pretty you win or you lose family is
22:20
different so you can't an attorney can't
22:22
Rel everybody loses in family law cases
22:25
every time there's loss because of just
22:26
the nature of the experience and going
22:29
to court someone always loses because
22:31
you're not going to get the exact
22:32
outcome you want and it's a very
22:33
expensive stressful process so what
22:36
could someone expect to pay for one of
22:38
these experiences because I've heard
22:40
things like $200,000 which most people
22:43
don't even have whereas you know because
22:46
attorneys I mean they you guys have a
22:48
pretty good hourly rate like I don't
22:51
want to email the attorney because it's
22:53
$150 you know right I mean I give my uh
22:57
when clients hire I give them sort of
22:59
how our process works and everything's
23:01
transparent my hourly rate is
23:03
transparent PE clients get a bill every
23:04
month so they can see where their
23:05
money's going I'm like always ask
23:07
questions if you don't understand your
23:08
bill I don't charge you for explaining
23:10
your bill I said but anything that
23:13
require attorney time or skills I have
23:17
my support staff do and the reason for
23:19
that is their billable rate is obviously
23:20
much lower so rather than me drafting
23:23
say a disclosure statement well my par
23:25
legal can do that for probably a third
23:27
of the price where I'm just it checking
23:29
it over cuz nothing goes out the door
23:31
bers and accountants like they' set it
23:33
up and then the accountant signs off
23:34
nothing goes out the door of my office
23:35
without me looking at it no matter how
23:37
minimum because that's what that's what
23:38
you're paying for you know but you know
23:40
I I'm just I'm transparent you know we
23:42
we when you are an attorney and you've
23:44
been doing things a long time I can do
23:46
things a lot faster than an attorney who
23:48
say been an attorney for a year so
23:50
instead of paying that attorney you
23:51
don't need to go do any research it's
23:52
like I know how to do this boom you
23:54
might even have templates set up in your
23:55
email what would take a new attorney 3
23:58
hours maybe takes me an hour right you
23:59
know yes you're paying my hourly rate is
24:01
more than that newer attorney but you
24:03
compare that cost at the end you're
24:04
still paying me less right that makes
24:06
sense that's kind of what I talk about
24:07
with people who come to EMDR therapy and
24:09
they're paying higher because we're
24:10
Specialists it's like but your treatment
24:12
time is going to go from five years to a
24:14
year exctly you're going to save a lot
24:16
of money in the long run and and also
24:18
you're going to get better faster so
24:19
you're going to be out of the weeds
24:20
faster so I think that you're kind of
24:22
saying the same thing like you get what
24:23
you pay for and and it is worth the
24:25
investment to get out of this tumultuous
24:27
time and a more exped
24:29
that's always my goal we unfortunately
24:31
you know just like mental health
24:33
professionals just like any other kind
24:34
of professional there are attorneys out
24:36
there who their end goal is how much can
24:38
they charge you makes you feel dirty
24:40
thinking about that that's gross it does
24:41
I don't even like saying it out loud but
24:43
humans are humans will be fallible yes
24:46
yeah so well I really appreciate all of
24:48
this this is so helpful and and um and
24:51
hopefully you know those who might
24:53
unfortunately need to be go you know
24:55
have to go through an experience that
24:56
would require this kind of service and
24:58
need to know I think this is great that
25:00
you've been willing to share your many
25:01
years of expertise with us ABS is there
25:03
anything else that you want to you want
25:05
to leave here before we wrap up for
25:06
today you know you touched on this a
25:09
little bit earlier that divorce and
25:11
custody it's emotional it's you're
25:13
dealing with loss you're dealing about
25:15
if you're going through a divorce you
25:17
have had your children in your house
25:18
24/7 now they're only with you half the
25:21
time all of that's emotional and it's
25:23
hard and you really just want to to the
25:26
extent that you're able you know take
25:28
care of yourself have a good mental
25:30
health professional and make sure if you
25:32
are going to choose legal counsel choose
25:34
legal counsel that you feel understands
25:36
that and is going to like bedside manner
25:41
for yeah and it's going to handle your
25:43
your case with a solution oriented
25:46
mindset not a litigation oriented
25:49
mindset that's really a really fair
25:51
thing to say and I would and I would
25:53
just add to it when we're going through
25:55
an active traum like traumatic
25:57
experience which divorce always is even
25:59
when done well and not very adversarial
26:02
like I said before it's going to be
26:03
traumatic and it always is traumatic for
26:05
children I mean they're going through so
26:07
much loss whether they're young or
26:09
they're old this is you know this is
26:11
going to be a thing I would just say
26:12
make sure people get mental health
26:14
counseling and because it's traumatic
26:16
you know if you can find an EMDR
26:18
therapist that understands the way
26:19
things will get stuck if we don't
26:21
address it I would recommend that for
26:23
sure um I recommend it for sure right
26:25
yeah yeah well you got to do things that
26:29
you know let's be effective and
26:30
efficient great well I thank you so much
26:33
for being on with us today um wealth of
26:35
knowledge uh Diane Sullivan if you're
26:38
looking for some advice or and you're in
26:40
the state of Arizona and you have needs
26:42
uh is it Sullivan law.com what's your
26:44
website Sullivan Law a suvan law a.com
26:48
we'll go ahead and put that in the
26:49
description if you'd like to investigate
26:51
further but uh hopefully you don't need
26:53
this but if you do I think you'd be in
26:55
great hands with with selecting
26:57
selecting someone like her especially as
27:00
you've gotten to know her a little bit
27:01
through this experience but um so take
27:04
care of yourselves if you are going
27:05
through this process and make sure that
27:07
you get the supports that you need and
27:10
um until we meet again I thank you so
27:12
much for being here and thank you for
27:13
joining us today Diane and U make sure
27:16
that you move forward and Lead With Love
27:18
because it'll never steer you wrong