TaylorMade Qi35 Drivers | Golf Monthly Review
0 views
Jul 28, 2025
Golf club expert Joe Ferguson gives his verdict on the new TaylorMade Qi35 drivers for 2025. He gives the Qi35, Qi35 LS and Qi35 Max a thorough test and while there's plenty to like about all three drivers, there is one problem he's stumbled upon that could pose a problem for one of the models... be sure to watch to the end to find out.
View Video Transcript
0:00
When TaylorMade releases new drivers, the industry takes note. In this video
0:04
I'm going to be taking an in-depth look at the three new models. So without further ado, meet QI35
0:25
So what have we got? Well, as normal for TaylorMade, we've got the LS model
0:28
which is the more compact low spin offering. We've got their core or standard model in the middle
0:33
and we've now got the Max, the 10K Inertia Maximum Forgiveness model at the end
0:39
Now, before I get into the tech, I have to say these things look incredible. I absolutely love
0:44
this kind of light gray carbon effect that we've got on the crown here. It really is a different
0:49
color to anything else on the market at the moment. I think this is a master stroke from
0:53
TaylorMade. From a marketing point of view, when you see this out on tour in the bags of your Rory
0:58
McElroy's, your Scotty Scheffler's, you're going to know exactly what it is. Reminds me a bit of when
1:03
they released the R11 driver back in the day of the whitehead. You knew exactly what you were
1:07
looking at on the TV. This matte finish gives it such a premium feel. It looks like the interior
1:12
of some sort of supercar and I'm thrilled to say they've stuck with the Infiniti crown that they
1:17
brought in the QI10 family instead of having one of those banner strips across the front. It just
1:22
suits my eye a little bit better. Talking about the front edge, they've also kept this little
1:27
white line that was brilliant for alignment. I found that really useful on the QI10 range
1:32
and subsequently in my testing of this, once again, it's really useful for alignment
1:36
Now this lineup is super minimalistic in terms of its coloring. There's next to nothing
1:41
but the tiny accents that there are are kind of a vibrant light yellowy green. They've been used
1:47
super sparingly and I think that's really to the benefit of the look here. Now, as always with
1:52
visuals in anything in life it's all totally subjective what you like i might not like and
1:57
vice versa but for me personally i can't remember liking the look of a driver family as much as this
2:03
in years so that's a great start with the looks but we want to know about the technology right
2:09
and as always there is quite a heavy tech story that has sculpted the development of this range
2:14
so heavy in fact that i've had to come back to my office and grab a pen and a whiteboard to do some
2:19
explain it. So the story of this QI35 range is all about CG or more accurately CG projection. Now
2:26
you probably all know what CG is. It's the centre of gravity or essentially the point at which the
2:31
driver head is perfectly balanced and I've represented that here with this little circle
2:35
with the cross in. But CG projection is kind of a new term to some of us. So that's represented
2:40
here by the dashed line heading out towards the face. It's basically where this CG projects onto
2:46
the face relative to the loft. So we'll call that this point here
2:50
Now, TaylorMade are telling us that's very, very important because that has a huge influence
2:54
on the ball flight characteristics such as launch and spin. So generally speaking when you strike beneath that CG projection you get one of those lower launching higher spinning ball flights that we know can rob us of distance So TaylorMade have been working on what they call their area of opportunity which is creating more space to hit above that CG projection to give us those
3:15
high launching low spinning ball flights that we know result in optimal distance. But it's tricky
3:21
because they want to also make a driver more forgiving. So when people have been dragging CG
3:25
locations back, so if we pretty much go horizontally back from the other CG location
3:30
what we'll see there is based on the loft of the face the cg projection raises again which lowers
3:37
our area of opportunity to get those optimal ball flights so what tailor made have done
3:42
is they've saved a lot of discretionary rate in the hosel and the crown area and they've moved
3:47
that weight around the head as low and as far back as possible thus moving that cg back but
3:53
also keeping it as low as possible to get much lower cg projection and increase that area of
3:59
opportunity that's going to allow us to hit longer drives more often. Simple, right
4:08
So let's go through the family model by model, starting with the low spin or the LS model. And I
4:14
was really interested to see this this time around because on tour last year with the QI10 range
4:20
the LS didn't actually pick up much traction. Players like Rory McIlroy and Scotty Scheffler
4:25
actually favored a version of the core model and put that in place
4:29
I was intrigued to see what had changed. And in terms of the head shape, at least, very little
4:33
It's almost identical to the QI10 LS in the playing position. So the more compact, pear-shaped head remains
4:40
but the weight track that sat underneath on the QI10 LS has been replaced with some interchangeable weights
4:46
We've also got a third at the back in this rear weight position. In terms of the raw performance data
4:52
I haven't actually seen much difference between the new LS and the QI10 LS in terms of speed
4:59
and spin numbers. However, one thing I really did pick up on is it feels a lot more playable
5:05
than the QI10 LS for me. Last year's model, whilst brilliant and very low spin and quick
5:10
I did find it quite volatile on those mishits, which is why I wonder if a lot of those tour
5:16
players that I've referred to there, your Rory's and your Scottie's, opted into the core model for
5:20
just that little bit more forgiveness. In terms of the impact feel and the acoustics, I really like
5:26
it. It does feel a touch firmer and a bit more robust than last year's range, but that's a feeling
5:31
I really like and that continues throughout the whole family. All in all, this LS model does
5:36
exactly what it's supposed to do and those of you who love a little bit more of a compact
5:40
pair-shaped profile and low spin characteristics are going to love this driver. In terms of ball
5:46
flight and spin and overall performance, it'll do exactly what you're hoping it will do. However
5:50
However, I think this next driver might give it a bit of a problem. So on to the main QI35 head
5:57
And as soon as I picked this up, I knew I was going to like it. I'm a sucker for a rounded profile and a driver and they don't come much rounder than this
6:04
It one of the reasons I leaned into the core model from last year in the QI10 and they actually made it even rounder So much so when you put them down next to each other now in hindsight the old QI10 which I thought was really rounded actually looks a little bit pear in comparison So not only the looks hit the spot here for me I found
6:20
the performance exactly what I was looking for. It had a lively feel, albeit a touch firmer than
6:26
last season's model. It provides a seriously powerful impact feel and the data is tough to
6:31
argue with. Now in the neutral weight setting I found this an incredibly safe and user-friendly
6:36
driver. Plenty of spin but nothing excessive and I found a lot of fairways in this setting
6:42
What I really like about this is these two interchangeable weights make a massive difference
6:46
As soon as you flip it around and get more weight to the front I was seeing about 200 to 250 revs
6:52
difference in spin almost activating beast mode if you like and producing a really low penetrating
6:58
ball flight with minimal spin that really upped my distance output. I did sacrifice a little bit
7:04
of accuracy in that setting but that's to be expected when you're moving that CG forward
7:08
and I love the versatility this offers. You're almost getting two drivers in one here. Now this
7:13
is where I do wonder whether this head could be a problem for the LS model. Essentially like I said
7:19
if you're in that neutral setting it is a different driver. If you want to flip it over and move that
7:23
weight forward you're getting a really similar spin profile to the LS but in a much more user
7:29
friendly shape with a touch more MOI so once again I do worry about the LS with the quality of this
7:36
QI35. Sorry to interrupt if you are enjoying this content please like the video and subscribe to the
7:43
channel we've got loads of great content coming out this review season so you won't want to miss
7:47
any. And last but by no means least the QI35 Max. Now last year was a huge year for high MOI drivers
7:55
and the QI10 Max was a real success at retail. In my testing I found it lacked a little bit of the
8:01
oomph of some of the other models that were professing to have 10k but that's really been
8:06
addressed with this new QI35 Max. So although as you would expect and hope the spin has jumped up
8:12
a little bit from the core model here. It is far from excessive. One thing I did find with the QI10
8:17
Max last year was my spin numbers got a little bit out of control and that cost me in the distance
8:23
regard. But with the QI35, I'm actually spinning at around 200 revs per minute less than I did the
8:29
QI10 Max and I haven't sacrificed any dispersion. When I tested this out, I had a fitting at the
8:35
TaylorMade HQ in Basingstoke. You could throw a blanket over all of my test balls. It was incredible
8:40
the tightness of the dispersion there and in my subsequent testing sessions that has continued
8:45
Now TecnaMate actually contacted me last year after my reviews of the Qi10 range because I was
8:50
reporting some quite reduced speed numbers in the Qi10 Max in particular and what we found was quite
8:56
interesting. The Qi10 Max itself would actually play about quarter of an inch shorter than the
9:01
rest of the range because the head had been squashed down to facilitate that wider head to
9:06
increase the MOI, the hosl had shrunk a little bit, which made it play about a quarter of an inch shorter
9:11
as I said and I was actually losing clubbed speed And when I lost that clubbed speed obviously that generally translates into ball speed Now in the QI35 max they have addressed it the hosel gotten slightly longer
9:22
so we're going to play the same shaft length throughout this entire range that's going to
9:26
maintain that speed and that's what I've seen in testing my distance numbers have really jumped up
9:31
because of it. However with the max distance isn't really the main story although it is impressive
9:36
it's the dispersion that's the really standout factor for me off miss hits off heel toe high
9:41
high-low, the stability of this head is simply fantastic. And I don't think I've ever hit a driver straighter
9:47
than I hit this thing. So to summarize, the tailor-made driver drop is one I always look out for
9:53
and this one has not disappointed me at all. Starting with the looks
9:57
they've absolutely smashed it out of the park. I can't remember a driver family
10:02
I've liked the look of more in recent years at all. This light gray carbon finish
10:06
I think is a master stroke A in terms of marketing, and it just looks so clean and minimal
10:12
And the minimal theme continues with the accent colors. There is some, but like I said
10:17
it's been used really sparingly. I think that really benefits the overall look
10:20
of these clubs. In terms of the model lineup, well, there's three really strong models
10:24
that have all definitely improved upon their predecessors. The only slight criticism I would have within this range
10:31
is I do feel that LS model is going to struggle purely based on the quality and the versatility
10:37
of the main QI35 model. I can't see why you'd push yourself into that LS model
10:42
unless you really like that pear-shaped look when you can get a very similar spin profile
10:47
out of the main QI35 and get a little bit more forgiveness and MOI in there as well
10:53
Secondly, while the QI35 Max is an absolutely brilliant product and it has certainly moved on from the QI10 Max
10:59
the stability's there, the slightly lower spin profile, and as I said, it's just incredibly forgiving
11:05
I feel there is a slight lack of a heavily, heavily draw bias product within this range
11:10
Now, TaylorMade will argue, and I agree, you can add some draw bias in with the loftsy by
11:15
lofting up and changing that face angle, but you can't really do it with the weight setting here
11:20
So if you're a really heavy slicer of the golf ball, that might be something to think about
11:24
but generally speaking, it's really neutral, it's super forgiving, and it's a great range of drivers
11:30
The major highlight of this range for me is that middle QI35 model
11:35
There's nothing I don't like about it. It could well be winging its way into my bag
11:39
The looks, the profile, the performance, and the versatility make that a real standout driver of 2025 for me
11:46
Another thing worth noting for me is that TaylorMade have released a really clever fitting head
11:50
of every model that all sort of major fitting accounts with TaylorMade will have access to
11:55
This has got built-in face sensors that are in precisely the right place to give you super accurate launch monitor data
12:02
and club readings. So this to me at least is TaylorMade's most impressive driver family launch since the incredibly successful SimRange
12:11
But I want to know what you think about it. I always like reading your comments so drop them down below
12:16
Is this something you're interested in trying out and what are your thoughts on what we've done here
12:20
As always, thanks for watching and we'll see you next time
#Golf
#Golf Equipment
#sports