Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America, and one constitutional
0:05
law expert, he said Biden just got caught red-handed. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
0:15
Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow
0:19
You know, Biden's story about his son Hunter Biden's business dealings, what he knew, what
0:24
he didn't know, how involved he was, it has evolved over time
0:29
Because you remember, it started with he didn't know anything. He didn't know anything about the deals
0:34
Then of course it became, well, he knew, but he wasn't involved in them
0:38
And then it's now a matter of, well, how involved was he in them
0:42
So we've kept the same stance from the beginning. No, you haven't
0:46
No, you haven't. And so now what they're saying is, the Democrats, if you can't produce a smoking gun that shows
0:55
money directly went from basically Hunter Biden to Joe Biden, if you can't produce that
1:02
then this impeachment inquiry is over. You have nothing. But that's not really true
1:07
See, Jonathan Turley says there is a smoking gun, and he said Biden clearly lied
1:13
And he's going to explain to you how Biden clearly lied in this video
1:19
So I want you to watch it and listen carefully, because this is all the media, the Biden administration
1:24
Biden himself, they're trying to obfuscate from this, from the blatant lies that Joe Biden has told
1:30
in particular, one blatant lie that Joe Biden has told. So please watch it and then like, comment, share and subscribe
1:39
I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you
1:46
Take care, everybody. There will be action on that. OK, so to the point of whether the impeachment inquiry is winding down, what's happening there
1:54
Ben Samms over the White House said this in a posting to X
1:58
Calmer knows 20 plus witnesses have testified that POTUS did nothing wrong
2:02
He knows that the hundreds of thousands of pages of records he's received have refuted his false allegations
2:08
This is a sad stunt at the end of a dead impeachment. Call it a day, pal
2:12
Yeah, I thought it was quite shocking to see that level of taunting of the House
2:16
This is one of the most important things that the Congress and a president can be involved
2:21
in an impeachment inquiry. And actually, when I testified in the Biden impeachment hearing, I noted that Sam's and
2:28
others might be tripping some wires here. This is what got the Nixon White House in trouble is when the White House counsel and
2:35
other offices got involved in the narrative. There are serious questions here
2:40
There are 10 questions presented. He doesn't have to appear to answer them
2:43
But the president's stance contradicted me. He clearly lied when he said that he had no knowledge of his son's business dealings
2:51
He was also clearly aware of an influence peddling scheme, and he was the focus of it
2:56
And what the Democrats have done successfully is created this false narrative that he has
3:00
to receive money directly for this to be corruption or bribery. Federal courts have rejected that
3:06
They've said repeatedly that money going to family members is corruption, can be crimes
3:12
like bribery. But are they going to answer these questions? No. The president would rather drink molten lead than answer any one of these questions
3:21
Should he? Of course he should, because he stands contradicted and the public has a right to know
3:26
But I think all of us, if we were his attorneys, would tell him not to answer any of those questions
3:31
We probably agree on that
#Politics
#Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
#Media Critics & Watchdogs
#Other


