'Could Not Be Worse' - Alvin Bragg's Trump Case Destroyed

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia 4 Explain America, and Alvin Bragg, the district attorney with the weakest case, in my opinion, against Donald Trump

Well, he's in a lot of trouble. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

Now, Jonathan Turley was speaking to Fox News when he was speaking about Alvin Bragg's case, and you may have heard him speak about this before

but what he said was his case could not be worse. He said it's very weak

These are statutes that, you know, it would be insane to see applied to anyone else

And he believes, of course, that it's only being applied to Donald Trump because he's Donald Trump

He talked about in this video the incredible weakness of Bragg's case, which he believes is falling apart at the seams

You know, that seems to be a common theme with a lot of these cases. They're falling apart. They're falling apart because they're like a house of cards

They're built on very, very thin evidence and very, very stretched laws

You know, they're doing gymnastics in some of these cases to get these laws to work, to fit a crime that they're trying to find

It's one thing when you have a crime in front of you're like, we've got to prosecute this. But don't forget, this is a case Alvin Breg didn't want to prosecute

That is until somebody from Joe Biden Justice Department got hired by Alvin Brag and then suddenly suddenly this case came back to life You don think that going to be mentioned in that trial by the defense No this case is very weak and it should be very concerning for Alvin Bragg

But I want you to hear a legal expert talk about it, and Jonathan Turley. I'm going to play that video for you now, and then please like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody

...pushing to get the judge overseeing his hush money trial. Off the case, they say the judge's daughter works for a political consulting firm

with Democratic clients posing a conflict of interest, writing, quote, there is an unacceptable risk that the court's family relationships will influence judicial conduct

Join us now, Fox News contributor, Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University

Here's from the letter from President Trump's lawyers. It could no longer be ignored that authentic commercial interests are benefited by developments in this case

that harm President Trump's penal interests and divert his efforts from running his leading campaign for the presidency

by requiring him to prepare and sit for trial during the general election

The DA's response to the case was that the daisy chain of innuendos is a far cry from evidence

that this court has a direct personal, substantial or pecuniary interest in reaching a particular conclusion

I lay all that out there Jonathan so people get both sides This is what they saying Now let hear from you Does the Trump team have standing here with this concern Well they have standing

You can bring this in a court of law, and that's where this belongs. It shouldn't be hashed out in social media

Attorneys all the time raise not just conflicts, but the appearance of conflicts

Some involve family members. Indeed, many on the left have long attacked Supreme Court justices over their family members

and their activities. But with two weeks to go, it'd probably be easier

to move the courthouse than the judge in this case. And the reason is that they are very reluctant

unless you have something quite direct and sort of unassailable. We don't know what they have

but generally the activities of an adult child do not prove determinative

for these types of motions. That once that child is an adult

then they're not really, their actions are not attributable. to those of the judge or vice versa

You mentioned the Supreme Court, and it's true that the left has been furious about Clarence Thomas

and they say that his wife was agitating on the right and even like try to make some sort of connection on January 6th

Maybe there is. I don't want to litigate that here. But Clarence Thomas has not recused himself from cases

Is that a model here for this judge to say, I don't have anything to do with my daughter's business

Well those attacks preceded on Thomas and his wife preceded January 6th So they been attacking him over her political involvement for years

And I don't even think he has to cite that. I mean, the fact that it's an adult child is usually enough

But the Trump team is going to, is asking to file, and they appear to be suggesting they have something more

We'll have to see. When you look at these filings, you're looking for direct action from the judge or direct

direct benefits to his family linked to the case. That could be campaign contributions

It can be campaign appearances. We just don't know. But the odds are against the team in dislodging this judge

I wonder also about just the court of public opinion, right? So we're covering the story

Others are covering the story about this. And in some ways, because President Trump has to wage part of his presidential campaign

from the courtroom where he's required to be, there might be a way at least to get

some earned media on this. the final word on that? Well, the optics are horrendous

I mean, this is a very weak case. It my view it is weaponization of the system

And now you have these gag orders flying right before an election that could turn on the

weaponization of the criminal justice system. So this could not be worse for our country

And I think these judges have gone too far with some of these orders. Jonathan Turley, thank you for your thoughts this morning

We'll see what happens