0:00
I recently asked a simple question on
0:02
social media. What do you personally
0:06
consider the maximum safe depth to dive
0:09
on air? Now, I expected different
0:12
answers, but I didn't expect just how
0:15
wide the spread would be or how
0:18
revealing the reasons behind those
0:20
answers would turn out to be.
0:23
Some people felt that anything much
0:26
beyond 20 to 25 m already brings
0:30
noticeable cognitive risk. For them,
0:33
narcosis appears early and clarity drops
0:38
At the other end, a small number talked
0:41
about depths well beyond 70 m on air.
0:46
Almost without exception, those comments
0:49
were framed as personal experience
0:52
rather than advice. Usually with strong
0:55
caveats about conditions and workload
0:58
and the bad old days. So those extremes
1:02
existed, but they weren't where most
1:04
people sat. What really stood out was
1:08
how many people independently converged
1:11
on a similar answer. across the comments
1:15
the average depth came out at around 45
1:18
m with a clear cluster close to that.
1:22
Now that doesn't make 45 m a magic
1:25
number, but it does suggest that many
1:28
experienced divers when left to their
1:31
own judgment arrive in roughly the same
1:36
More interesting than the number itself
1:37
was how people explained it.
1:41
Very few talked in terms of absolute
1:45
Most described their depth as
1:48
The same depth felt very different
1:50
depending on visibility, current,
1:52
temperature, task loading, and even
1:57
Now, not surprisingly, narcosis came up
2:00
a lot. sometimes in subtle ways. Slower
2:04
thinking, poorer prioritization,
2:08
reduced situational awareness, or even a
2:12
creeping false confidence. These were
2:14
mentioned far more often than dramatic
2:19
Now, gas density appeared less often,
2:22
but when it did, it reflected the
2:24
growing awareness, I think, that has
2:26
been shaped by more recent research and
2:29
the updated recommendations from
2:32
recognized authorities in diving
2:34
physiology. For some people, P2 was
2:38
actually the primary limiting factor
2:40
rather than narcosis, which surprised
2:43
me. Another strong theme was no stop
2:46
limits. Many divers said their depth
2:49
limit was driven less by physiology and
2:52
more by a deliberate choice to avoid
2:54
decompression dives altogether
2:57
which naturally pulled their personal
3:03
I think it's also worth looking at the
3:04
institutional perspectives
3:07
in the UK. Both the Health and Safety
3:10
Executive and the UK armed forces have
3:13
historically regarded diving to around
3:16
50 meters on air as acceptable, provided
3:19
that training controls, equipment, those
3:22
kind of things are in place. So, it's
3:25
really interesting that many divers
3:28
choose limits that are both shallower
3:30
and deeper than that. And I think that
3:33
contrast between institutional standards
3:36
and personal judgment is one of the most
3:39
interesting things to come out of this
3:42
I guess it's worth saying that air has
3:45
been used as a diving gas for a very
3:47
long time. Yet this apparently simple
3:50
question still doesn't have a
3:52
universally agreed answer. Different
3:55
agencies, different organizations have
3:58
taught limits from around 30 m through
4:01
to 60 m in some systems.
4:05
But the comments make it clear that
4:07
those numbers need to reflect human
4:10
beings and human performance.
4:13
And that's perhaps because this was
4:15
never really about a single number.
4:18
Depth decisions are personal choices
4:22
shaped by how each diver weighs the
4:24
factors they think are important.
4:27
Narcosis, gas density, oxygen exposure,
4:31
workload, environment, and frankly the
4:35
amount of margin they feel comfortable
4:40
For me, if I'm asked what I consider a
4:42
reasonable maximum limit for diving on
4:44
air, my answer is 50 m. I say that
4:48
because of my own experience and because
4:51
of the accumulated anecdotal evidence
4:53
from many decades of other people's
4:58
So I think 50 m beyond that the margins
5:03
are not acceptable. The task loading
5:05
increases but particularly the effects
5:08
of narcosis, breathing effort and even
5:11
oxygen exposure begin to overlap to
5:14
create unacceptable risk.
5:17
Having said that, I think it's also
5:19
important to be clear that I don't wait
5:22
until I get to 50 m before I start
5:24
thinking about helium.
5:27
Adding helium before that has got to be
5:31
the more sensible and conservative
5:33
choice. We all know it gives you
5:36
clarity. It reduces the work of
5:38
breathing and makes decision making
5:41
easier at depths where air is already
5:44
starting to compromise your performance.
5:47
So if you're doing a dive where clearer
5:51
thinking, lower breathing effort, and
5:55
spare capacity are valuable, then helium
5:58
is the right decision. And I think
6:01
that's why this question is still worth
6:04
answering and asking. not to settle the
6:07
argument, but to encourage divers to
6:10
think critically about why they choose
6:12
the limits they do. Now, I just want to
6:14
say thank you to everyone who's taken
6:16
the time to comment on my thread. And
6:20
also, I hope that this video will prompt
6:23
you to reflect on your own choices. And
6:26
if you do, for me, that's probably the
6:29
most valuable outcome of all.
