0:00
why if you look what's happening in the
0:01
States now a lot of the what would you
0:03
call them Tech Bros rode in behind
0:05
Donald Trump people wouldn't have
0:06
assumed that a few years ago because he
0:08
promised this big deregulatory agenda
0:11
and and we've got that here no we
0:12
haven't there was that thing was it
0:14
Christmas Eve when starma and reev said
0:16
oh actually this economic growth thing
0:18
sounds like a good idea you mentioned
0:20
some of the sort of problems that she's
0:22
been having of some Mysteries over her
0:24
CV some funny expenses perhaps in a
0:26
previous job but actually really what's
0:28
properly putting her in trouble is this
0:30
it's the estate of the economy
0:31
University's 45 million quid on these in
0:34
salaries in the last few years and
0:36
taxpayers money has been going on what
0:38
was it in there Tik Tock dances and
0:40
queer robots and all this sort of just
0:48
good hello I'm Alice Demby opinion and
0:51
features editor of cityam and this is
0:53
what's the context where we'll be
0:55
talking through the week's best writing
0:56
on business markets Innovation and
0:58
freedom all which can of course be found
1:01
online and in the pages of cityam with
1:04
me to take us through is James price a
1:06
former government special advisor senior
1:08
fellow at the Adam Smith Institute and
1:10
most importantly a CM columnist and
1:13
today we're going to be discussing
1:14
Rachel Reeves's Jobs Tax where the
1:16
rumors of the death of Dei are to be
1:18
believed and how Pub closures are also
1:20
affecting the music industry so James
1:22
thanks so much for joining me so um
1:24
first thing I want to talk about is uh
1:25
the ongoing effects of Rachel Reeves's
1:27
budget Matthew kilcoin who's an
1:29
economist rate for us this week we're
1:31
now seeing the effects of this in the
1:32
jog market and that it's proving the
1:34
laugher curve can you explain to us what
1:35
he means by that basically just says a
1:37
very simple truth which is that if you
1:40
for example uh have no taxes at all
1:42
obviously the state will bring in no
1:44
money but of course if you tax everybody
1:46
100% the state's not going to really
1:48
make any money because people are going
1:49
to stop working no one's going to bother
1:51
to do anything so at some point there is
1:53
an optimal tax take you know you can
1:54
imagine on the graph it kind of goes up
1:56
in a bell curve and goes down again and
1:58
laa never went any further than saying
2:00
exactly where that would be but that
2:02
lets you into a world that says well if
2:03
I raise taxes you would assume that I
2:05
would bring in some more money but
2:07
actually if there are other factors
2:09
there and people go on now that tax rate
2:10
is higher than it is in the UK and
2:12
France or in Germany or America I might
2:14
stop that kind of economic activity it's
2:16
not worth my time and so this idea that
2:18
if you do some sort of dynamic pricing
2:20
of taxes we have a better understanding
2:23
of the effect of those taxes over time
2:26
it's a very simple idea and if Rachel
2:28
Reeves really were the famed Economist
2:30
that her CV used to say that she was she
2:33
might know this yeah so I mean what he
2:35
says proves that this is happening is
2:36
some data that's out this week from the
2:38
cipd which says um that about a third of
2:41
British firms are planning to cut jobs
2:44
and about half are freezing prices so we
2:47
are now seeing the realtime effects of
2:48
how this tax rice is essentially eroding
2:51
the economic activity it's seeking to
2:53
tax yeah absolutely right and this is
2:55
something that we all were talking about
2:57
at the time and I'm afraid to say that a
2:59
lot of people in this city were were
3:00
fooled perhaps maybe willfully fooled
3:03
seeing the writing was on the wall and
3:04
the country was going to vote labor in I
3:07
would say as a as a very partisan figure
3:09
on default because my old party of the
3:10
conservatives lost rather than labor
3:12
winning but there was this idea of what
3:14
was it called the smoked salmon
3:15
offensive of Labor figures going around
3:18
hobnobbing in the city and saying don't
3:19
we were listening to you guys just like
3:21
Tony Blair's labor party were were
3:23
really Pro business what was the mandon
3:25
line were intensely relaxed about people
3:27
getting Filthy Rich and people in the
3:29
city went okay motivated reasoning here
3:30
I can choose to believe this
3:32
everything's going to be fine and now
3:34
the rubbers hit the road and reality hit
3:36
turns out if you tax people into
3:37
Oblivion you get a massive dampening of
3:39
economic activity we're all the poorer
3:41
for that absolutely I think what's
3:43
particularly troubling is where you look
3:45
what sectors are being hit hardest so
3:46
actually the city people are reading
3:48
City M are probably going to be fine big
3:50
businesses can absorb these costs it's
3:52
businesses like Hospitality like child
3:55
care there small businesses that employ
3:58
lots of people on quite low wages that
4:00
are being hit the hardest yeah yeah and
4:03
it's deeply upsetting this isn't it you
4:04
know that that those people are the
4:06
lifeblood of the economy right millions
4:08
and millions of people who are just
4:10
trying to earn a crust for whom the idea
4:12
of profit being a dirty word they profit
4:14
is how I end up you know going on my one
4:17
holiday a year it's how I put new I
4:19
don't know uh new films for my kids to
4:21
go and see at the cinema it's those
4:23
little treats left over after working
4:25
hard and these are the people that are
4:27
suffering these kinds of policies you
4:28
make a great point that these big
4:30
businesses can absorb it and
4:31
unfortunately big business does have a
4:33
tendency to do that look at compliance
4:36
right across the board you know once new
4:37
regulations come in big businesses May
4:40
fight against it but when it happens
4:41
they've got the legal teams they've got
4:42
the accountancy guys they've got all
4:44
those people they can gatekeep around
4:46
that and stop new entrance to the market
4:48
and it's those kinds of new disruptive
4:50
entrance that will help uh the kind of
4:52
economic growth we really really need
4:54
it's why if you look what's happening in
4:56
the States now a lot of the what would
4:57
you call them Tech Bros Road behind
5:00
Donald Trump people wouldn't have
5:01
assumed that a few years ago because he
5:02
promised this big deregulatory agenda
5:05
and and we've got that here no we
5:07
haven't there was that thing was it
5:08
Christmas Eve when starma and reev said
5:10
oh actually this economic growth thing
5:13
sounds like a good idea who should we
5:15
ask should it be the think tank should
5:16
it be businesses should it be Enterprise
5:18
no let's ask The Regulators how they can
5:20
go for growth it's a funny one isn't it
5:22
though she has this week I think called
5:23
in a bunch of Banks and so on to to sort
5:25
of you basically begging them for ideas
5:27
for growth and they say well you
5:28
shouldn't have done the n something um
5:32
um essentially yeah I mean what do we
5:34
think about Reeves's prospects moment
5:35
you mentioned some of the sort of
5:37
problems that she's been having a bit
5:38
ofit some Mysteries over her CV some
5:41
funny expenses perhaps in a previous job
5:43
but actually really what's proberly
5:45
putting her in trouble is this it's the
5:47
estate of the economy right and there's
5:49
rumors that K starm is going to overrule
5:51
her to try and increase defense spending
5:53
where's she going to get that money from
5:55
um there's possibly something a fiscal
5:58
event coming up in the spring um we're
6:00
gonna get some new OBO forecasts
6:01
possibly a spending review possibly
6:03
something more like a minor fiscal event
6:06
do you think she's going to survive this
6:07
what do you think she's going to do do
6:08
you know what paradoxically although it
6:10
would be it would be really embarrassing
6:12
for the labor government to lose a
6:13
Chancellor like this and that the budget
6:16
that Reeves was in charge of and
6:18
delivered in what was it October after
6:20
several months should have been very
6:21
good that was very bad actually weirdly
6:23
perversely think that she's the best
6:25
that labor have got right well if you
6:27
think about anybody else around that
6:28
cabinet table not sure there's a single
6:30
one of them with any actual private
6:32
sector experience at all Rees may have
6:35
you know let's just call her spade a
6:36
spade she lied about her levels of
6:38
experience she said that she worked at
6:40
the bank ofland what for a decade it was
6:42
five years she she said she worked as an
6:44
economist when in fact she was a
6:46
complaints Handler I think right and and
6:48
I think what actually happened is that
6:49
she saw there was a plum labor seat
6:51
coming up in leads so she moved from
6:53
London up to leads to Eng gratiate
6:54
herself with the local labor party the
6:56
local community I've got a real problem
6:58
with somebody doing that this the kind
6:59
of sacrifice that you want people to
7:01
make to serve in public office but when
7:03
she's fibbed about all these things it's
7:05
put her in a in big trouble but as I say
7:07
she's the onlyone has got any experience
7:08
there at all we've seen the business
7:09
secretary Jonathan Reynolds this week as
7:11
well who said that he was a solicitor
7:13
turns out nope no he wasn't I mean some
7:16
wom would say that's breaking the law
7:17
it's it's breaking the law to
7:18
impersonate being a solicitor for the
7:20
purposes of practicing law and there's
7:21
some controversy over whether Reynolds
7:23
May by saying this perhaps saying he was
7:25
a full solicor to get elected even there
7:27
may be some problems there too so those
7:30
are the two most Pro business
7:32
growth-minded people around that cabinet
7:34
table if they go goodness me are we
7:36
going to get someone who's more Pro
7:38
business than them I'm not sure there is
7:39
anybody in that party with it which
7:41
really really scares me okay so a vote
7:43
of confidence in the chancellor there
7:45
let's move on let's talk about your
7:46
column that you wrote this week you uh
7:49
wrote about the rumors of the death of
7:51
Dei have they been greatly exaggerated
7:54
take us through it well as a as a
7:55
moderate writer as ever picking the the
7:58
non-controversial topic so Dei for the
8:00
few people who haven't spotted this this
8:01
is diversity equity and inclusion this
8:05
sort of I would ca for us to call it a
8:06
fad uh or a trend that's kind of swept
8:09
through started in the United States of
8:11
America like so many of these things do
8:13
and it's swept over here and just as the
8:16
the the tide of Dei has been receding
8:19
over in the states with the vibe shift
8:21
that I've talked about in this piece
8:22
it's great phrase the vibe shift it will
8:24
happen here as well in in all kinds of
8:27
ways the big businesses are starting to
8:28
shed their Dei teams not just in this
8:31
stat the kind of Walmarts that you would
8:33
assume but again these big Tech Giants
8:35
who pushed so much of this kind of
8:37
radical progressivism the metas the
8:39
Amazons the Googles they're shedding all
8:41
of this stuff the big Banks the Goldman
8:43
the JP Morgan the city groups they're
8:45
shedding a lot of their Net Zero
8:46
practices which I think would come under
8:48
the kind of larger uh cultural war that
8:50
you think that we need to impoverish
8:52
ourselves in the UK in order to make
8:54
these targets that aren't actually going
8:55
to make any real dent in improving the
8:57
environment I would go so far as to say
9:00
the point of the piece though is that a
9:02
lot of these guys have dined so well I
9:03
think I go so far as to call them
9:05
grifters they've DED very well and terit
9:07
again very moderate inclusive language
9:09
for me passing on my Dei tests um but
9:12
these people have DED so well on the
9:13
taxpayer te in so many ways and that so
9:16
many of our institutions are still what
9:18
was Robert jenri call it spaffing money
9:20
against these things universities 45
9:22
million quid on these in salaries in the
9:24
last few years and taxpayers money has
9:27
been going on what was it in there uh
9:29
tick Tok dances and queer robots and all
9:33
this sort of just complete rot the sort
9:34
of stuff that Doge in America is finding
9:37
we're finding here we've got to stop all
9:38
of this and I think what I found really
9:40
interesting in your piece is this idea
9:41
that it's you know fine businesses are
9:43
quite responsive to what's going on in
9:45
government because you know that's the
9:47
market but the institutions this stuff
9:50
is so embedded and I think I see it so
9:52
much when I go to art galleries for
9:54
instance I remember going to the Walker
9:56
Art Gallery in Liverpool last year and
9:58
everywhere let you look there are sort
10:00
of posters hectoring you that the money
10:02
for this collection Came From Slavery
10:04
and that you shouldn't be just enjoying
10:06
these beautiful paintings and sculptures
10:08
the richness of this great City you
10:10
should be feeling ashamed and one thing
10:12
that particularly struck me there's this
10:13
beautiful sorry this is a bit of a
10:15
personal rant but there's this beautiful
10:17
funerary Monument beautiful marble
10:19
sculpture of two little girls who died
10:21
of tuberculosis when they were children
10:23
stunning piece of sculpture and there's
10:25
the label on it says um slaves didn't
10:28
get funerals this was a wealthy family
10:30
who could afford to pay for this funeral
10:32
it's like so you're not even allowed to
10:33
just think it's sad and beautiful that
10:35
these children died and that I think is
10:37
where you see the rot of Dei and the you
10:41
know that the kind of its worse
10:42
expression I think yeah I I think that's
10:44
a great point I think your first point
10:45
is great that businesses can do this
10:47
stuff quite quickly they can just shed
10:48
all this stuff it's just it's it's not
10:50
only is it a dead weight for them I
10:52
think actually it's it's really actively
10:54
negatively harmful to workplaces you you
10:57
get this I think the harbor business has
10:58
talked about this other areas that if
11:00
you've got um an employee who is a
11:02
member of an ethnic minority there are
11:04
middle managers who are so scared about
11:06
causing offense or tripping any of these
11:08
things that rather than have a quiet
11:09
word about performance the way they
11:11
might do with say another white
11:12
colleague that they go oh God I don't
11:14
want to make a problem here so they
11:15
immediately escalate it to the kind of
11:17
formal disciplinary channels and then
11:20
that makes everything much worse because
11:21
this P are being targeted I don't see
11:23
other people being targeted so it causes
11:25
all these different kind of um stresses
11:28
and strains amongst amongst races
11:30
amongst religions amongst Sexes all
11:32
these sorts of things and let's not
11:33
forget that the one of the few very good
11:34
people who working what we would may
11:36
maybe called de Martin Luther King said
11:38
we should judge people on the content of
11:40
their character rather than these things
11:41
so that you know that that kind of paity
11:43
of thinking that's really actively
11:45
negatively affecting it I think you're
11:46
dead right and I think you're also right
11:48
that this this institutional point is so
11:50
so problematic uh universities galleries
11:53
all these guys that get huge amounts of
11:54
taxpayer funding don't worry about the
11:56
bottom line they'll keep this going you
11:59
Rob Henderson might call the luxury
12:01
belief they can keep going for this
12:02
stuff because they're not having to pay
12:03
for it and as you say I just think it's
12:05
corrosive you can't mourn the death of
12:07
two little girls from tuberculosis right
12:10
those people of course are a standing
12:12
they're a sticy for all those who died
12:14
of tuberculosis at a tragically young
12:16
age and how wonderful it is there are
12:17
now cures for those kinds of things you
12:19
the idea of having basic human empathy
12:21
to understand how other people who don't
12:23
look like you or live where you live can
12:25
feel is all being eroded because of this
12:27
stuff and it's not a trade-off you can
12:29
MN those little girls and all of those
12:31
people who died anonymously from slavery
12:33
in terrible circumstances if I would say
12:35
if I would Min stick up for Dei I think
12:38
that there must be some places where
12:40
it's useful and necessary the one thing
12:41
I think about is how for example if
12:43
you're a black woman in the UK you're
12:45
four times more likely to die in child
12:47
birth and that's not explained by
12:49
socioeconomic circumstance alone that
12:51
just has to be racism so I feel like
12:53
there must be some organizations and
12:55
institutions where it is useful to look
12:57
at these things through
13:00
through a DI lens do do you think there
13:01
is any other examples that you might I'm
13:04
I'm I'm absolutely a for the healthcare
13:06
providers or anybody else looking what
13:08
the the data actually tell them and
13:10
acting on it the problem is that so much
13:11
of this stuff so quickly has become so
13:13
ascientific so unscientific that you
13:16
can't really tell these things and of
13:18
course the last thing in the piece is
13:19
that whilst we're wondering about how
13:21
many genders there are you've got Russia
13:23
and Ukraine and and the Americans
13:24
perhaps pulling out you've got the
13:25
threat of China you've got actual
13:27
environmental issues that were not
13:29
coming up with new technologies to be
13:30
able to to solve and if our universities
13:33
are fannying around with all this sort
13:34
of what I call it woke Tosh right then
13:36
they're not focusing on the really
13:38
existential problems yeah so the last
13:40
story I wanted to talk about was an
13:41
article we had in our Pages by Mick
13:43
Foster who's the CEO of uh something
13:45
called gig Pig and he's talking about um
13:48
the uh the poor state of the hospitality
13:50
industry but actually this has wider
13:52
Halo effects on other Industries as well
13:54
so the music industry saying lots of
13:56
bands like Oasis like bands that we're
13:57
going to be celebrating quite soon at
13:59
the upcoming Brit Awards had their start
14:02
in pubs greasy floors we're going to
14:04
lose out on many many of the next
14:07
generation of our creatives what what do
14:09
we think about that yeah well again this
14:10
is this is the the tragic thing about
14:12
bad governance right you you see again
14:14
the headline thing okay we're going to
14:16
put this tax up on this um we're going
14:17
to do this that and the other and it's
14:19
all going to be great for people but you
14:20
don't look at the negative effects there
14:22
right just take for example you know the
14:24
taxes on beer right uh I think taxes on
14:26
beer go up it's called what's known as a
14:28
pagui tax so you put a tax up on
14:30
something in order to disincentivize
14:32
people doing it that's why you put extra
14:34
taxes on smoking for example right of
14:36
course no one ever PR wonder what
14:38
happens when you put extra taxes on
14:39
income who know what happens there but
14:40
that's beside the point you tax beer
14:42
more fewer people can afford to go to
14:43
the pub for as long beer uh the pub
14:46
industry suffers few people start going
14:48
out as you say knockover effects taxis
14:50
suffer musicians suffer all these
14:52
negative effects and that's because the
14:54
the cost of doing these things is so
14:56
high that's one part of it I think
14:57
another part of it is just LIC ing laws
15:00
London has had what was her name Amy
15:02
lame who supposed to be exactly by name
15:05
by Nature right a great case of
15:06
nominative determinism paid an eyeing
15:09
salary to do about 5 minutes work a week
15:11
in order to boost London's nightlife and
15:13
of course under her Tage under her
15:15
watchful eye more live venues and more
15:18
places for nightclubs and all the rest
15:19
of it have shut it's not happening in
15:21
Manchester by the way a guy called Sasha
15:22
Lord there doing the same job Manchester
15:24
NTI thriving here in the capital it's
15:27
suffering enormously what does that do
15:29
to people it just means your quality of
15:30
life is much worse right you're so taxed
15:32
here sadik's done nothing about the kind
15:34
of knife crime epidemic and your phone
15:36
being snatched it's miserable all the
15:38
time and when you want to just go and
15:39
Escape you want to go down to the pub
15:40
with your mates you want to let your
15:42
hair down and go and Boogie like I used
15:43
to do a million years ago you can't do
15:45
it because it's too expensive and places
15:46
are shutting down and the last thing
15:48
about it is that you've got people who
15:49
will moving to somewhere like Soho for
15:51
hundreds of years has been this fun hip
15:53
happening place or whatever will move in
15:55
there move opposite a pub and then start
15:57
complaining about it no just move to
15:59
sorry move to somewhere quiet right and
16:01
let Soho be Soho let these places let
16:03
the inner bits of cities have fun and
16:05
not be subject to these kinds of
16:07
ridiculous nimas Licensing Laws yeah I
16:09
completely agree and and I think this
16:11
the fate of our pubs is such a sort of
16:14
what's syneptic syep is the word you
16:16
used earlier for the state of the
16:17
economy more broadly because it it's um
16:19
it's a result of the housing crisis it's
16:21
a result of the change in working habits
16:22
since the pandemic Licensing Laws as you
16:25
say and nimi culture it's all society's
16:27
problems all in one affecting pubs which
16:30
are the place where we're meant to go to
16:31
have fun right how much is the pint in
16:33
the city these days do you know it well
16:35
I mean I've paid upwards of 7even eight
16:37
quid for pints per and at that point you
16:39
know you're lucky that you've got the
16:40
pint in which you can cry right it's
16:42
that depressing the government can
16:44
change it can change its rules think
16:46
about that laugher curve we talked about
16:47
at the top and we can make things better
16:49
and we can all go to the pub and
16:50
celebrate well I think with that James
16:52
we're going to go and have a pint Cheers
16:55
Cheers thank you very much