0:00
We have not discussed a workers's wage
0:05
Can I ask to cut the mic, please? Can I
0:10
What's a workers's wage for party
0:15
Oh, she's getting up.
0:18
She's She's telling him off.
0:22
Oh, it's They've cut the feed.
0:24
Excuse me. I will not allow I'm sorry. I
0:28
will not allow people to speak outside
0:30
of the motion. If he will he has
0:33
It's very funny because the card holders
0:34
in there said this is your party but
0:36
clearly not this guys.
0:38
It's not for individuals. We are not
0:42
Oh, there we are. This is your party.
0:46
Um that's hilarious. Um it's proper
0:49
Stalinist stuff, isn't it? It's like two
0:51
bold men fighting over a comb. I mean,
0:54
this is a party that's managed to pick
0:56
factions and have purges before it's
0:58
even picked a name. And the name they've
1:00
gone for is your party when the one
1:02
thing that they hate more than
1:03
capitalism is each other. Um, I also
1:06
like the idea that these people want to
1:08
run the country. I think Zara Sultana
1:11
said at this conference that she wanted
1:12
to nationalize the entire economy when
1:14
they can't organize a in a brewery is
1:16
frankly laughable. But I think it would
1:19
be easy to be complacent about this and
1:21
say that this makes the case in itself
1:23
for a smaller state and frankly a
1:24
center-right government. I mean these
1:26
tedious arguments they seem to be having
1:28
about process and committees are hardly
1:31
a prospect for government. I mean I have
1:33
no idea what they were even arguing
1:35
about there and I doubt any voters will
1:37
either. They clearly care a lot more
1:39
about ideological purity uh than they do
1:42
about appealing to the country at large.
1:44
I also think that if you look at
1:46
political history, um it's usually the
1:48
case that what you need is a charismatic
1:50
leader to take the country with you. It
1:51
may be the case that Britain is going to
1:54
uh follow a path of radical change led
1:56
by 26 grizzled socialists, but I think
1:58
it's unlikely. There's also a clear
2:01
problem for your party here is that they
2:03
have a an obvious fault line between
2:04
their very kind of socially liberal
2:07
members uh and the Muslim independents
2:09
that are also part of this movement. I
2:12
mean try waving a quiz for Palestine
2:14
flag in actual Palestine. It's, you
2:16
know, not going to work. That said,
2:18
there were obviously a lot of people at
2:20
this conference. There is clearly a
2:21
clear cohort of people in the country
2:23
who are attracted to these far-left
2:25
ideas. You see people joining the Green
2:27
Party, clearly interested in what this
2:30
obvious charlatan, Zack Palansky, has to
2:33
offer. I mean, the man was a hypnotist.
2:35
Um, Palansky is not even his real name.
2:37
So, let's laugh at your party. Sure. But
2:39
let's also keep making the argument for
2:41
business, for prosperity, and for
