0:00
About a year and a half after that, I'm
0:02
in a green room at Fox and I'm not going
0:04
to say who because they didn't give me
0:05
permission to share it, but well, they
0:07
the story about who they are. Says, you
0:10
know, Ebstein's a an intelligence asset
0:13
for people in the Middle East, right?
0:14
I'm like, no, I didn't know that. I'm
0:15
like, you sure that? The person, let's
0:18
say, is like, I'm absolutely sure that
0:21
that he's either a witting or unwitting
0:24
asset, intelligence asset. meaning his
0:27
plane and that island, the cameras,
0:30
there's a big assumption out there that
0:31
these videotapes were exclusively in the
0:33
custody of Epstein. That's a huge
0:36
mistake. The reason they wanted this
0:38
story to go away is because there's an
0:40
assumption like, "Oh, yeah, Epstein had
0:43
him." No, he wasn't the only one who had
0:46
him according to this source. These
0:48
assets, that's why this blackmail story
0:49
makes so much sense. Which Middle
0:51
Eastern countries they are, I don't
0:52
know. But this person who is a very very
0:55
good reporter, I mean aces, right, swore
0:58
Epstein was either a witting or
1:00
unwitting intelligence asset and they
1:01
may have had his plane wired up and
1:03
they're the ones who have all this
1:05
stuff. So the point is to sum it up, how
1:08
how do you know some of these countries
1:10
aren't going to some of these power
1:11
players who aren't making decisions,
1:13
hey, you wouldn't want this video out
1:14
there, right? How do you know?
1:16
100%. I mean that let's let's
