Up next in 10
Chinese Spy Scandal: Did Congressman Swalwell Betray US Secrets?
Jun 7, 2025
Uncover the shocking story of Christine Feng, a Chinese intelligent agent, and her deep ties within the Democratic Party. Explore Feng's relationships with politicians like Eric Swalwell and her potential influence on US policy. Learn about #ChineseSpy #SwalwellControversy #PoliticalInfluence #TuckerCarlson #ChineseSpy #EricSwalwell #PoliticalInfluence #FoxNews #DemocraticParty #USPolitics #IntelligenceCommunity #ForeignInterference #SwalwellControversy
View Video Transcript
0:00
A Chinese intelligent agent called Fung
0:02
Fun, or as she renamed herself when she
0:04
came to this country, Christine Fun,
0:06
became a force within the Democratic
0:08
Party of California. Along the way, she
0:11
cultivated a number of Democratic office
0:13
holders. Fun had sexual relationships
0:15
with at least two of them identified in
0:17
the Axio story as mayors from Midwestern
0:19
cities. Fun also began a relationship
0:22
with a man called Eric Swallwell. You
0:25
may recognize that name. Eric Swallwell
0:27
is a member of the United States
0:29
Congress. Swallowwell sits on the House
0:31
Intelligence Committee. He is privy to
0:33
this country's most closely held
0:35
secrets. Fun's relationship with Swabell
0:37
began in 2012. Like so many Chinese
0:40
spies, Fun used college as her cover.
0:44
She enrolled as a student at a
0:45
university in the Bay Area, and she
0:47
immediately joined a number of left-wing
0:49
identity politics organizations on
0:51
campus. From there, she quite naturally
0:54
began raising money for Democratic
0:56
candidates. US intelligence officials
0:58
believe that Fun had a sexual
1:00
relationship with Eric Fwell Swallwell.
1:03
We asked Swallwell's office about that
1:05
directly today. His staff replied by
1:07
saying they couldn't comment on whether
1:09
or not Swallwell had a sexual
1:11
relationship with Fun because that
1:12
information might be quote classified.
1:15
They did not elaborate or explain what
1:17
they meant by that.
1:19
We do know that when Fung met Swallwell,
1:21
he was a littleknown city councilman in
1:23
the Bay Area, but he had grand political
1:25
aspirations. Fun became his regular
1:27
companion. She was photographed with
1:29
Swallwell at political events several
1:31
times. She became a financial bundler
1:33
for his political campaigns. Fun
1:35
apparently pulled in large amounts of
1:37
money from a variety of sources to help
1:39
Eric Swavewell get elected to Congress.
1:42
It's not entirely clear where all of
1:44
that money came from.
1:46
We do know that Fung helped Swallwell
1:48
secure the support of his district's
1:50
Asian-American community. Political
1:52
analysts have called that a critical
1:54
factor in his win in 2012. That's not a
1:57
new trick for Chinese intelligence
1:59
services. Another Democrat from the
2:01
state of California, the state's senior
2:02
Democrat, Senator Diane Feinstein,
2:04
employed a Chinese spy in her office for
2:07
nearly 20 years. That spy drove
2:10
Feinstein around and directly assisted
2:12
her in outreach to Asian-American
2:14
voters. Like the spy that Feinstein
2:16
hired, Fun gained access to Eric
2:18
Swallwall's office in Washington. US
2:21
officials say Fung managed to install an
2:23
intern in Swallwell's office, almost
2:25
certainly as a spy for the Chinese
2:27
government. Now, we don't know the full
2:29
extent of Fun's intelligence activities
2:32
in this country. Eventually, she fled
2:34
the US for China while under FBI
2:36
investigation. Swallwell claims he
2:38
hasn't talked to her in years. We do
2:41
know that in Eric Swallwell, the Chinese
2:43
government picked a promising vehicle.
2:45
Swallwell is one of the most
2:46
high-profile members of Congress. Last
2:49
year, he ran for president of the United
2:51
States. At every turn, Eric Swallwell
2:53
has remained a reliable source of
2:56
Chinese government propaganda. As a
2:58
member of the House Intelligence
2:59
Committee, he styled himself as an
3:01
expert at spotting foreign interference
3:03
in our government. Remarkably, as you
3:06
may remember, Suvo spent years accusing
3:08
the sitting president of working for a
3:10
hostile power. The question has shifted
3:14
uh from whether the president is working
3:15
with the Russians to what evidence
3:17
exists uh that the president is not
3:20
working uh with the Russians. He's
3:21
betrayed our country and I don't I don't
3:23
say that lightly. I I worked as a
3:24
prosecutor for seven years and I
3:26
betraying the country. By the way, we
3:27
want evidence before you say that. But
3:29
you said an agent of Russia. Yeah. He he
3:32
works on their behalf. Do you still
3:33
believe that the president is a Russian
3:35
agent? I think he acts on Russia's
3:37
behalf and he puts Russia's interests
3:40
ahead too often of America's interest.
3:42
You're a member of judiciary. Do you
3:44
believe the president right now has been
3:45
an agent of the Russians? Yes. I I I
3:47
think there's more evidence than he is.
3:49
Yes. And I I I think all the arrows
3:51
point in that direction and I haven't
3:52
seen a single piece of evidence that
3:53
he's not.
3:55
Looking back, it's hard to watch that
3:57
tape. The irony is overwhelming. It's
4:00
always those who have the most to hide
4:03
who attack other people for the very
4:05
things they've done. Always. Even at the
4:08
time he was saying that it was very
4:10
obvious to us that something was very
4:12
wrong with Eric Swallwell. So two years
4:15
ago we asked Swallwell to come on this
4:16
show and reveal the evidence he claimed
4:18
he'd collected on Russian collusion.
4:21
Swallwell came, couldn't turn down a TV
4:23
opportunity. He made loud noises and he
4:26
left. He had no evidence, but he didn't
4:29
stop making allegations. Here he is at a
4:31
hearing with Jim Comey back in 2017.
4:34
I want to talk about the Kremlin
4:36
playbook. And there are a number of ways
4:39
that a foreign adversary could seek to
4:42
influence a person. Do you agree with
4:43
that? Yes. Financial? Yes, that can be
4:47
one. Uh romance, you said, is another.
4:49
Yes. Compromise. Correct. Oh, it's part
4:53
of the playbook. Part of the Kremlin
4:55
playbook. Eric Swallwell says, "See,
4:57
what they do, these foreign intel
4:59
services, is they use sex, a honey trap,
5:02
if you will, to set up a compromise."
5:05
Uh-huh. Spoken like a man who knows that
5:07
subject quite well. When the Russia hoax
5:10
subsided, as it inevitably did because
5:12
it was a lie, Swavel turned his energies
5:14
to his first love, which is defending
5:16
the government of China from all
5:18
criticism. In March, Suavel told the
5:20
rest of us that we are racist if we
5:23
describe where the Corona virus came
5:24
from originally. He said this on
5:26
Twitter. Quote, "When lawmakers refer to
5:28
CO 19 as a Chinese virus, they're not
5:31
only misleading the public about a
5:33
disease with confirmed cases in over a
5:35
100 countries, they are stoking racism
5:38
and xenophobia in our communities.
5:40
Diseases don't have an ethnicity.
5:44
Period. So, if you're bored sometime,
5:46
take those words and type them into
5:48
Google and you will find analoges almost
5:50
precisely to the word in Chinese state
5:52
media." That's what he was repeating. If
5:55
you ask Eric Swallwell, blaming the
5:56
Chinese government for the Corona virus
5:59
was a mistake. The right reproach is to
6:02
defer to the Chinese government as much
6:04
as you possibly can. In 2017, Swallow
6:07
express expressed outrage that the Trump
6:10
administration was taking too tough a
6:12
position with China's ally, North Korea.
6:15
He wrote this quote, "The president's
6:17
reckless and inconsistent North Korea
6:19
strategy risks American lives. Instead,
6:22
Swallow demanded Trump must quote talk
6:25
to experts, allies, and
6:28
China. Swallow had been saying similar
6:30
things for years. In 2013, for example,
6:33
he demanded that we quote, "Engage China
6:36
and Russia to keep Iran nuclear free."
6:39
Do you notice a pattern here? Of course
6:42
you do. And yet, here's the amazing
6:44
thing. As of tonight, with this all this
6:46
information public, Eric Swallwell, who
6:49
has used his office to promote Beijing's
6:52
talking points almost word for word,
6:54
ones that matter, by the way, a man who
6:56
admits to a close personal relationship
6:58
with an actual Chinese spy who helped
7:01
him get elected to Congress, raised
7:03
money for him, and put an intern,
7:05
probably another spy, in his office.
7:07
That man continues to serve on the House
7:10
Intelligence Committee where he has
7:12
unrestricted access to classified
7:14
information. How is this happening?