0:02
morning we're here today because Mark
0:06
Carney has failed to come clean with
0:10
Canadians about his financial interests
0:12
and his conflicts of interest now we
0:16
know that he's had opportunities to do
0:19
that and has failed to he hasn't
0:22
questions fully or honestly and this is
0:28
reminiscent for anyone who's been
0:30
following Mark Carney over the last few
0:33
months when it comes to his responses on
0:36
his relationship with Brookfield Asset
0:39
Management now when asked about his
0:41
relationship with Brookfield first of
0:44
all he said that he had no role in
0:47
Brookfield moving their headquarters and
0:49
jobs from Canada to New York City but we
0:54
know that that was a lie and when it
0:58
comes to his connections now with
1:00
Brookfield Mr Carney won't say what his
1:04
financial interests are saying only that
1:07
he's put his assets into a blind trust
1:12
now that might work for regular
1:17
stocks but what we have here is Mark
1:22
carne's benefitting from assets that
1:26
generate carried interest the $15
1:30
billion Global transition fund the $10
1:33
billion second Global transition fund
1:37
2.4 billion doll catalytic transition
1:41
fund and I want to offer a quote from
1:44
the CEO of Brookfield Asset Management
1:48
put simply carried interest is our share
1:51
of the profits realized on an entire
1:53
fund subject to that fund exceeding a
1:56
minimum Target return for clients if we
1:58
meet fund expect ations we get 20% of
2:01
the profits that's from the CEO of
2:04
Brookfield Asset Management now why does
2:07
matter when it comes to public office
2:10
holders like the Prime Minister and like
2:13
ministers they're supposed to recuse
2:16
themselves from anything that would
2:17
cause them to be in a conflict of
2:19
interest anywhere they could take a
2:22
decision that would improve their
2:26
financial interests now Mark Carney has
2:30
shown that in the past he's willing to
2:33
take decisions that put his own profits
2:36
ahead of people like I just mentioned
2:38
with the moving of brookfield's
2:40
headquarters from Canada to New York
2:42
City the express purpose of that was to
2:45
increase profits for himself and when he
2:48
was advising Justin Trudeau as the
2:50
senior economic adviser sitting in the
2:52
prime minister's office advising him
2:55
when Brookfield Asset Management had
2:57
interest in heat pumps what did he
3:00
advise Justin Trudeau to
3:02
do to push heat pumps and that's exactly
3:05
what Justin Trudeau did increasing
3:11
Carney the problem is that Mark Carney
3:14
knows that these funds exist in fact he
3:18
set them up so he knows exactly the
3:20
decisions that he needs to take as prime
3:24
minister to increase his financial
3:28
benefit and and saying that they're in a
3:32
in a blind trust means that he's not
3:34
going to recuse himself from any of the
3:36
decisions that would lead to him
3:38
increasing the financial benefit to
3:42
himself basic transparency requires Mark
3:48
Canadians to answer questions that have
3:50
been put to him by the media about what
3:54
his assets are to confirm that he will
3:56
benefit from these buried interest
4:01
assets to confirm what's
4:04
in his blind trust because he knows and
4:07
he's going to continue to know
4:10
that when he's making and taking
4:14
decisions the basic level of
4:16
transparency that's required and the
4:19
right thing to do because Mark Carney
4:21
says he has nothing to hide so if he has
4:24
nothing to hide then it's very easy for
4:28
today and to disclose to Canadians to
4:31
finally answer answer media's questions
4:35
about what his financial interests are
4:37
and what those conflicts of interests
4:38
are because that's what Canadians expect
4:41
thank you Mr bar is it your allegation
4:44
that Mr Carney got into politics to get
4:47
rich wouldn't it just make more sense
4:48
for him to stay at Brookfield if he was
4:50
only interested in making money I think
4:52
Mr Carney has shown that he's willing to
4:56
use whatever position he has to further
4:59
his financial interest so as as chair of
5:02
Brookfield he was also advising the
5:05
government and Advising them to take
5:06
decisions that improved his financial
5:08
position when he was on the board at
5:10
stripe we saw the same thing with stripe
5:14
being shielded from the government when
5:16
they were refusing to pass on
5:18
savings to small businesses when when
5:21
they were required to to cut their fees
5:24
and he'll help out his friends like we
5:26
saw with his decision uh or his
5:29
relationship with uh with the chair or
5:31
the owner of of telesat and the
5:34
government taking a decision to uh to
5:37
award uh more than a billion dollars to
5:40
to T usat immediately after Mark Carney
5:42
was named the senior economic adviser to
5:45
Justin Trudeau so it seems like whatever
5:47
position Mark Carney is in he uses it to
5:50
improve the financial benefit to himself
5:53
and that's why the transparency that
5:55
we're calling for is essential what do
5:57
you want him to do do you want him to
5:59
give up the the this money that comes
6:00
from the carried interest like
6:02
concretely what would satisfy you Mr
6:04
Carney needs to be transparent with
6:06
Canadians now if he wants to avoid the
6:07
conflict of interest he should divest
6:10
and not divest into a blind trust it
6:12
would mean that he would need to sell
6:14
those assets not not to Forfeit those
6:17
assets or the uh the payments that come
6:21
from these carried interest assets to
6:26
him but the the fact is right now when
6:29
he's been asked asked if he is going to
6:32
beneficiary of these funds he's refused
6:36
to say and so first of all we need to
6:38
know what the truth is which is always
6:41
hard to know when you're getting answers
6:43
from Mark Carney uh and then he needs to
6:45
do the right thing and to avoid even the
6:48
appearance of a conflict of interest
6:50
look these liberals have have broken
6:53
Canadians trust after 9 years they've
6:57
been a government of Serial ethical law
7:00
Justin Trudeau twice found guilty of
7:04
law we had Dominic LeBlanc we had Mary
7:08
Ing we had uh the former Finance
7:12
Minister Bill morau we had the
7:14
Parliamentary assistant to the Prime
7:17
Fergus they all disregarded this law and
7:22
so we need to see from Mark Carney
7:25
instead of non- answers full disclosure
7:27
you think the Prime Minister should call
7:28
an election right away
7:30
way first of all Parliament should have
7:33
been sitting since the last week of
7:34
January these doors have been padlocked
7:38
by the carne Trudeau liberals trying to
7:41
avoid the accountability and the
7:44
scrutiny that comes with a sitting
7:46
Parliament so we had a performative
7:48
scene with uh Mr Carney claiming to
7:51
cancel a law all by himself the the
7:53
first day that he was sworn in but
7:55
that's not how it works here in Canada
8:02
laws and these are the kinds of things
8:05
that should be debated and passed in
8:07
Parliament look conservatives have
8:10
for Parliament to be sitting so that we
8:13
could pass a plan that puts Canadians
8:15
first to pass a big bring itome tax cut
8:19
for Canadians to repeal the Liberals
8:21
anti-energy laws like Bill
8:24
c69 to tear down interprovincial trade
8:31
taxes like the carbon tax permanently
8:35
like the tax on new home construction
8:38
but two things can be true at the same
8:40
time if the government isn't prepared to
8:42
pass legislation that puts Canada first
8:46
then Canadians should decide in an
8:48
election and so while Parliament should
8:50
have been sitting conservatives are
8:52
saying that if the carne Trudeau
8:55
liberals aren't prepared to put Canada
8:57
first by passing that legislation in the
9:00
then it's time to take that to Canadians
9:01
in an election so you'd rather he recall
9:03
Parliament than go to an election right
9:04
now Parliament should have been
9:06
Parliament should be sitting so that
9:08
that point uh needs to be crystal clear
9:11
that Parliament should have been sitting
9:12
since the last week of January but if if
9:17
Mark Carney isn't going to isn't going
9:19
to allow parliamentarians to debate uh
9:23
laws and to pass legislation that puts
9:25
Canadians first then Canadians need to
9:30
and uh and for and and we believe that
9:32
they'll vote for a party that will put
9:33
Canada first like Canada's conservatives
9:36
can I just ask you Michael just about
9:37
we've all seen the polls I know
9:39
politicians don't like to comment on
9:40
polls except for the election day one
9:43
nonetheless the polls have narrowed
9:45
clearly some Canadians are looking at
9:46
the potential Prime Ministers and making
9:48
a different Choice than they might have
9:50
made six months ago and I wonder if you
9:52
have some thoughts about why the
9:54
Liberals might be back in the game is it
9:56
because for example that Canadians don't
9:59
know enough about the implications of
10:00
this conflict of interest the potential
10:03
conflict of interest or or what do what
10:05
other things do Canadians maybe need to
10:06
consider about Mr Carney aside from what
10:10
you've presented today well a couple of
10:12
things it's not surprising that the uh
10:15
the Carney trudo liberals have tried to
10:18
to Hide Mark Carney from questions we
10:20
saw him not take questions for extended
10:22
periods of time um between his the
10:26
debates and the liberal leadership and
10:30
the swearing in at R Hall so they've
10:32
been they've been trying to to hide him
10:35
they've they've avoided of course the
10:37
scrutiny of parliament by locking
10:40
parliamentarians out of the House of
10:42
Commons so they don't seem to want the
10:45
scrutiny that would come with any of
10:47
those accountability measures like
10:48
talking to the media or dealing with
10:51
parliamentarians when it comes to what
10:53
Canadians are thinking you know this
10:55
past week I've knocked on hundreds of
10:57
doors to go back to your question on if
10:59
if I think there should be an election
11:01
um I've knocked on hundreds of doors
11:03
this past week and the message that I've
11:04
heard from Canadians is that they're uh
11:07
they're exhausted after the last nine
11:10
years of these carne trudo liberals
11:12
they're finding it increasingly
11:14
difficult to uh to get by to make ends
11:17
meet I talked to one couple on Thursday
11:21
evening and they described themselves as
11:23
formerly middle class and I said when
11:26
did that change they said about 10 years
11:27
ago and they said they found it harder
11:30
and harder to try and make ANS meet they
11:33
downsized they moved into their son's
11:36
home with him and these are incredibly
11:39
difficult times now the message that
11:41
we've shared with them our Canada first
11:43
plan that's you know going to help uh
11:46
increase the uh increase the prosperity
11:49
of of Canada of Canadians by getting our
11:52
natural resources uh to Market by of
11:55
course um passing the tax cuts that
11:58
we've proposed for Canadians that we
12:01
have talked about ending the outof
12:04
control spending and inflationary
12:06
deficits of these liberals and and of
12:10
course protecting Canadians who are
12:12
terrified they're terrified with the
12:14
chaos that they're seeing in their
12:16
communities and and on the streets with
12:18
our commitment to uh to have jail and
12:21
not bail for repeat violent offenders
12:24
this message resonates very well and so
12:27
with the scrutiny that comes with what I
12:30
hope will be tough questions and
12:32
consistent pressure from the media for
12:35
Mark Carney to answer for things like
12:38
these these uh unknown Financial
12:40
interests unknown conflicts of
12:43
interest and uh because he's he's
12:46
avoiding the accountability of the House
12:48
of Commons The increased accountability
12:50
that will uh come with an election you
12:52
know Canadians are going to see that
12:54
that Mark Carney really is just like
12:57
Justin Trudeau you know he Mark carne's
13:00
only complaint with something like the
13:01
carbon tax for example over over the
13:03
last few years is that it wasn't high
13:08
when given the scrutiny when Canadians
13:11
have the opportunity to compare a leader
13:13
in Pierre PV who's committed to lower
13:16
taxes and to put Canada first and a
13:19
carbon copy of Justin Trudeau in Mark
13:21
carne uh we we look forward to uh we
13:24
look forward to the increased scrutiny
13:25
that he'll receive ta uh your party
13:28
seems to be accusing uh the prime
13:29
minister of not actually getting rid of
13:31
it and raising questions about the
13:32
document that was signed on Friday
13:33
what's your argument there so Mark
13:37
Carney isn't able to
13:39
unilaterally repeal legislation so this
13:42
is the important this is this is the
13:45
exactly and so as noted by this member
13:47
of the media Mark Carney is not
13:49
repealing the carbon tax and he's not
13:52
able to do that because it's a it's
13:55
required that Parliament passes that law
13:57
now if there was a commitment from the
13:59
carne Trudeau liberals to to do this
14:03
they would have done it in Parliament
14:04
but the fact is that 100% of Mark
14:07
carne's cabinet ministers have voted
14:10
more than a dozen times for the carbon
14:12
tax these are the same liberals who
14:15
promised in the 2019 election that the
14:17
carbon tax would not go up they lied
14:20
they then promised after they raised it
14:22
it would not go up they lied again now
14:25
here we are on the eve of an election
14:27
when Mark Carney needs Canadians vote
14:30
and he's saying that he has he has uh
14:33
zeroed the price that they've put on on
14:37
the carbon tax but when Mark Carney
14:39
doesn't need Canadians votes but he does
14:42
need their money he is absolutely going
14:44
to put the carbon tax in place and you
14:46
don't need to take my word for it listen
14:48
to what Mark Carney has said when he
14:49
said that he will use what he described
14:52
as a shadow carbon price this is a guy
14:56
who doesn't think that by taxing things
14:58
like like steel at the very time that
15:01
Donald Trump says that he's going to put
15:03
tariffs on Canadian steel that that's
15:05
not going to be a cost that is passed on
15:07
to Consumers that that's not going to
15:09
cause an increase in prices for
15:12
Canadians so you just need to listen to
15:15
Mark Carney if you want to know if
15:17
there's going to be higher prices and
15:19
more taxes for Canadians if he were to
15:22
be elected and of course Common Sense
15:24
conservatives have said that we will ask
15:26
the tax for everyone forever thank you
15:30
very much have a great day