Trump’s strikes on suspected drug boats are escalating into an international controversy, with some allies calling the strikes illegal.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
The United States and Venezuela seem to be on a path toward direct conflict
0:05
At the same time, some American allies are questioning the legality of U.S. operations
0:11
in the Caribbean, specifically the strikes on speedboats suspected of carrying drugs
0:17
Now there are conflicting reports some allies are withholding intelligence from their American
0:23
counterparts because of the strikes. So to really understand where this all started, we sort of need to go back to January 20th of this year
0:35
That's when President Donald Trump retook the Oval Office and signed an executive order
0:40
laying the groundwork for certain South American cartels getting the Foreign Terrorist Organization label
0:48
In February, the White House formally declared eight Latin American crime organizations as FTOs In August the U military buildup began in the Caribbean and on September 2nd the U carried out its first known strike on a small boat suspected of carrying drugs
1:08
A month later, after all sorts of debates in Washington and abroad about the legality of the strikes
1:14
Trump sent a memo to Congress informing them the U.S. was now involved in a non-international armed conflict with the cartels that were declared FTOs
1:25
and therefore killing anyone working for or with the cartels was justified
1:31
because they were considered unlawful combatants. We've reported on this before, so check out san.com for a full breakdown
1:39
But basically, the Trump administration's legal arguments for the strikes is because a country has a right to defend itself
1:46
and because these cartels are now considered foreign terrorist organizations, the strikes are legal
1:53
But outside of the administration it not so clear cut Democrats on Capitol Hill and even some Republicans are accusing the administration of carrying out extrajudicial killings which is a nice way of saying the strikes amount to murder
2:10
And this is where we start getting into conflicting reports of intel sharing or
2:14
not sharing. France and the UK both have a significant military presence in the Caribbean
2:20
and often work closely with the United States on drug intradictions. CNN reported the UK suspended intelligence sharing with the US over the boat strikes
2:31
but both US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his British counterpart Yvette Cooper denied that
2:38
claim and called it fake news. France did call the strikes on speedboats flatly illegal
2:45
but Paris and Washington are still sharing secrets too. Colombia did stop sharing intelligence with
2:52
the United States. The decision was made after Colombia's president, Gustavo Petro, said the
2:57
fight against drugs must come second to the fight to protect human rights Now up until this point all of the U strikes in the Caribbean and the Eastern Pacific happened in international waters
3:11
But if the U.S. starts hitting stuff on land in Venezuela, then U.S. allies may rethink their
3:17
stances on intel sharing, which happens in the international community. For instance
3:23
the Netherlands is not sharing intel with the U.S. right now because the Dutch think it might
3:29
wind up at the Kremlin. There have been at least 20 more strikes on suspected drug boats since the
3:35
first one in September. Around 80 people were killed in those strikes, maybe more. There have
3:41
also been several efforts in Congress led by Democrats to rein in the president's authority
3:46
in what's now being called Operation Southern Spear, but none of those efforts were successful
3:53
For more unbiased, straight fact reporting like this, download the Straight Arrow News app today
3:57
or check out the website, san.com
#news


