'Strikingly Anti-Democratic' - Supreme Court Bombshell Rocks Democrats After Colorado Decision
Jul 25, 2024
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the Supreme Court
0:04
Well, they're likely getting prepared for a supreme smackdown on the Colorado Supreme Court
0:10
after one of the most egregious, absurd, anti-democratic decisions in history. And if you don't believe me, well, let's listen to a law expert about it
0:20
Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
0:24
Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow. So, listen, Jonathan Turley was on Fox News yesterday after the Supreme Court decision
0:35
and he laid it out. He called it a strikingly anti-democratic decision. How could it not be
0:41
You've removed the leading Republican candidate from the ballot in a ridiculous move
0:46
And he took it a step further. He believes this will be struck down by the Supreme Court. He
0:50
believes it has to be struck down by the Supreme Court. And I'll expound upon this in just a
0:55
moment. But let's take a look at what he had to say. React, Jonathan Turley, Fox News contributor and law professor at GW University. Jonathan
1:04
to think that four unelected state court judges could conceivably end up determining
1:14
the presidential election is something I think most Americans are just shaking their
1:20
head tonight saying this can't be the United States. No, it is a strikingly anti-democratic holding, in my view. The court literally faced a series
1:30
of interpretive barriers to get to where it ended up. It adopted the most sweeping
1:36
broadest possible interpretation to get over every one of those hurdles. So throughout this opinion
1:45
it had to adopt interpretations that could encompass a wide array of statements. They
1:52
used what's called true threat precedent to show that you can view what Trump said
2:00
as encouraging an insurrection by looking at stuff that he said at other times. And that
2:06
of course, allowed them to reach this conclusion. In my view, the court is dead wrong. This is the
2:13
first major win for these challengers. They've gone to a number of blue states. This is one of
2:19
the bluest state Supreme Courts you can get to. Even with that, it's split. I think the opinion
2:27
is really chilling. And I think that the Supreme Court will make fast work of this theory. I hope
2:33
it does. But I think this court, I think, did great damage to its own integrity with this opinion
2:40
And there have been other rulings in other state Supreme Courts, correct, or federal courts that
2:47
have come to the opposite conclusion here. So this is an outlier, which again, because of what's at
2:53
stake, it's going to have to be expedited to the Supreme Court. Yeah. When you read this opinion
3:00
the one thing that keeps on recurring in your mind is where's the limiting principle here
3:06
Where is the limiting principle here? What would not satisfy this test? In each one of these
3:12
barriers, the court could have adopted a fairly moderate or more narrow approach, but it didn't
3:18
And so on every one of these issues, it really took out all the fail safes and went to the
3:24
broadest possible meaning. Well, that means that states could engage in a tit for tat
3:29
type of a series of decisions. You know, you could have red states blocking Biden on some
3:36
ballots and blue states blocking Trump. And the way this view is viewed by the public
3:42
is really quite horrific. You know, they view President Biden on the ropes and the
3:48
ref just called the match. Now, I believe if this is not struck down by the Supreme Court
3:52
then you've seen the end of democracy in this country. It's over. It's absolutely over at that
3:56
point. There's nothing left to fight for. Do you understand what I'm saying? Nothing left. They've
4:01
ended democracy by limiting the choices of the people of Colorado to vote for the president of
4:06
their choosing. A bunch of non-elected judges, each one appointed by a Democrat governor
4:15
Not one conservative on that court. Are you kidding me? This is absolutely a circus. It's
4:21
a kangaroo court. The Supreme Court, I think, will strike it down either eight to one
4:26
considering the new justice, or even nine to zero. I want to know what you think about this
4:30
but I don't think it's going to be close in the Supreme Court. Let me know in the comments. Also
4:35
please remember to like, share, and subscribe. Those little things really help us out. They
4:40
help our channel continue to grow, and they help all of us, all of us, fight for this republic and
4:45
this democracy. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take
4:52
care, everybody
#Law & Government
#Military
#Politics
#People & Society


