'People Are Going To Die' - Former Trump Official Warns Lives In Danger During Trials

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America, and a former Trump

official has just given a horrible, horrible, well, prediction about what could happen with

the Trump trials, and it could be deadly. Before we get started, please remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

Big shout out to the Facebook and YouTube followers who keep doing that. We love you guys

So there was a man on CNN speaking to Jim Acosta, and he worked, he was the chief of

Trump's Homeland Security Bureau when he was in the Trump administration, but when he was

in the administration, he was writing letters to newspapers under the name Anonymous, warning

about the dangers of a Trump presidency, and just basically attacking Trump every chance

he got while he kept a position in the administration and kept collecting his paycheck

Now he was on CNN, and he said some really horrible things about what could happen with

all the rhetoric that's surrounding the Trump trials, but he left out some important information

that I think is pretty pertinent. But first, let's take a look at what he said

Online threats against grand jurors who voted this week to indict former President Donald

Trump in Fulton County, Georgia. Some jurors have had their addresses, phone numbers, and social media accounts shared

on the internet after their names were made public in the 98-page indictment

Joining us now to talk about this and other aspects of the Trump case is Miles Taylor

He's the former chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during the Trump administration

the author of the new book, Blowback, a warning to save democracy from the next Trump, and

I suppose there's the current Trump as well to talk about. You know, he's made these inflammatory comments about the judge, about the special counsel

and so on in these cases. Now, if he worked in his administration, how do you think this is going to play out

Because I mean, I've talked to, I was talking with John Dean about this last night

It's going to be difficult to constrain him, and it seems as though he thinks he can just

cross the line and nothing's going to happen based on past experience. Genuinely, Jim, I've been living inside of this data about political threats and political

intimidation, and I worry legitimately that people are going to die. And we are seeing the threat of political assassination in this country is off the

charts, and the experts I talk to compare it to only one thing, the 1960s, and we of

course saw political violence. We saw political assassination in the 1960s. God forbid that happens, but the data supports that there is that danger

Look, we just saw the president of the United States threatened with an assassination plot

We saw on January 6th the vice president of the United States threatened with death

We saw Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, her home broken into. That's the presidential line of succession, not to mention the senior members of Congress

the Supreme Court justices who've been threatened with death, the governor of Michigan who had

an assassination plot, and this array of state and local election officials

So I do worry about it, and we saw after his home was raided a year ago, a man went to

the FBI field office in Ohio and shot it up. The judge here in D.C. after he was charged has been threatened with assassination, and

of course now the jurors in Georgia in the case after he was indicted have been doxed

and threatened. So I do worry we are seeing the light blinking red

Now all of that sounds really terrifying, right? But here's the thing

He left out James Hodgkinson, who shot up a congressional baseball game in 2019, seriously

injuring Representative Steve Scalise and others, and he was a Bernie Sanders supporter

He failed to mention that the Supreme Court justices who were threatened, well, they're

conservative Supreme Court justices. He failed to mention all the threats against Trump and Trump's children and Trump's supporters

that happen all the time. Where are those threats? No, he only wanted to focus on some fringe conservatives who are crazy by any standards

threatening people they perceive to be enemies. Look, if you're threatening people because of politics, you're already crazy, and it

doesn't take a lot to push you over the edge. That doesn't mean people can't speak because there might be some crazy person out there

Because we all speak. We speak on social media, we speak on Facebook, we speak on YouTube, we speak everywhere

And if we have to worry that one word we say might cause some wacko to go do something

horrible, well then that really stifles free speech, doesn't it? And maybe that's what they want to do, really

Maybe they want Trump to just not defend himself. Maybe they want to blame him for everything

That would be a switch, right? That'd be new. Folks, let me know what you think about this in the comments

Who's really in danger here? Who's really getting the most threats? I want to know in the comments

Also, please remember to like, share, and subscribe because that really helps us out

I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. Bye