Pelosi is toast.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Jim Jordan hit the nail on the head with what's going on talking about the January 6th commission
0:06
talking about the New York Manhattan prosecutor and the whole Stormy Daniels prosecution that
0:13
could be happening. He hit the nail on the head and we're going to get right to it
0:17
Folks, I'm Carmine Sabia and this is Explain America. Please make sure as always that you
0:22
like, you comment, you share, and you subscribe. It really helps a small channel like ours grow
0:28
Jordan was quoted as saying, there's been subpoenas into 11 individuals, 11 American citizens who asked the government for permission on an application to hold the Trump
0:40
rally. The government granted it. And the January 6th committee then petitioned them
0:45
to ask them questions about exercising their first amendment right to assemble
0:51
And then Jordan said, why would they subpoena me? I didn't do anything wrong
0:54
I talked to the president. I talk to the president all the time. I think that, you know, where I'm on
0:59
this commission, this is all about going after president Trump. That seems obvious. And what he
1:04
said was, and I think, you know, he could be overstating this here because I think liberals
1:09
don't see it this way. But he says everyone in the country sees this as a political operation
1:14
This is designed to get after president Trump because they don't want him to run again. Now
1:18
of course he is running. He is running. And now there is going to be, or Jordan wants there to be
1:26
an investigation into the investigation. Why was this done? Why did the January 6th committee
1:32
actually commence? Why were certain Republicans not allowed to be on it? The Republicans that
1:37
McCarthy, who is now the house speaker, Kevin McCarthy wanted on that committee
1:42
Why weren't they allowed on? What was the underlying reason? Well, I'll tell you what
1:46
the underlying reason was. The underlying reason was you had all Democrats and two anti-Trump
1:51
Republicans. And the whole point of that, the whole point of that committee was to pin it on
1:57
Donald John Trump, the former president of the United States. It was to say that he caused an
2:02
insurrection, that he wanted to quote, overthrow the government, overturn the presidential election
2:08
These are all the things he wanted to do by holding a rally. Is Donald Trump, when he holds a rally
2:16
if some people get out of control, is he any more responsible than let's say, I don't know
2:21
when Al Sharpton might hold a march for civil rights and a portion of that crowd
2:27
gets out of control and riots. Has there ever been any investigation into Al Sharpton for that
2:32
Did he cause those riots? I would posit to you that he did not. That wasn't his intention when
2:37
he went there. He went to protest peacefully. Some people got out of control. Trump explicitly
2:44
told these people to protest peacefully. Some people got out of control. That's what happened
2:50
And when you look at what Alvin Bragg is doing over in Manhattan, it's more of the same
2:56
He knows that anybody who knows anything about the law knows he has a flimsy case at best. Heck
3:01
legal experts on CNN were calling it a flimsy case. And a lot of former prosecutors saying
3:06
they wouldn't bring it. But what's the point? The point is Alvin Bragg wants to get reelected
3:11
He wants to quote, get Trump. And a New York jury gives him a good opportunity for that. He knows
3:16
it. Everybody knows it. And I think it's time to start running investigations into all these
3:21
investigations. I certainly agree with Jim Jordan. I'd like to hear your comments below in the
3:26
comment section. In the meantime, again, please make sure you like and you share and you subscribe
3:31
Please make sure you follow Explain America on Facebook. We love you guys. God bless you
3:36
Take care, everybody
#News
#Politics
#Campaigns & Elections


