'Out Of Order!' - House Hearing Erupts As Jordan Destroys Swalwell

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and things got insane

in the House of Representatives yesterday. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

Perennial jerk Eric Swalwell was trying to give a soliloquy to the rest of Congress

trying to smash President Trump during a hearing for Merrick Garland. However, it really backfired on him when Jim Jordan, you know, kind of thrashed him

You know, Swalwell tries to make everything a cause celebre for himself

He tries to get himself on the news and in this particular case, he was listing the countries

Trump couldn't go to now that he's a convicted felon in New York. Why

What did that have to do with Merrick Garland? What did that have to do with the Department of Justice

What did that have to do with the reason for the hearing? Nothing. Everything Eric Swalwell does is to fundraise

Everything he does. It's for fundraising emails, it's for sound bites on MSNBC and CNN

That's what he does. He wants to be a media star and Jim Jordan smacked him back into place

I want you to take a look at it. Let me know what you think in the comments

He didn't. Did he sit down for an interview with investigators prior to the January 6th indictment

I'm not going to comment on that. He didn't. He certainly didn't sit down for an interview with investigators in the classified materials

indictment, but President Biden did sit down for a voluntary interview with Robert Herr

A jury can't hold it against Donald Trump that he did not testify in his own defense

in New York, but he promised everyone else in the country that he would

You can hold it against Donald Trump that he did not testify when you consider whether

you should so blindly follow every wild claim that he makes. My colleagues, none of this today that you are bringing makes sense

Your inconsistencies, your hypocrisy, your sycophancy, unless you are in a cult

And guys, I'm starting to think you're in a cult. That is your right, but it's not your responsibility

I promise you that's not what your constituents would want. So if you believe in states' rights, except when a jury in that state convicts your nominee

for president, you might be in a cult. If you claim you back the blue but want to defund the police when the police go to your

nominee's house to retrieve national security secrets, you might be in a cult

If you're supporting a guy whose felony convictions prevent him from getting a security clearance

you might be in a cult. And if the guy you're supporting for president has felony convictions that prevent him from

going to Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, Dominican Republic

Egypt, Ethiopia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Macau

Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, and the UK

you might be in a cult. Plucky is recognized for five minutes. I'm asking that the gentleman��

I have unanimous consent request. Gentleman has unanimous consent request. I ask unanimous consent to submit for the record an amicus brief