BREAKING: Trump Classified Documents Case Blockbuster - Judge Makes Important Decision

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America, and the news is in

There is a trial date set for President Donald Trump, but is it good news or bad news

Well, that's going to be kind of up to you guys and up to the legal system

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

So the trial date has been set by Judge Eileen Cannon, and what she did, I think from a

legal standpoint, makes sense. It's very hard to say, you know, she's favoring Trump or she's, you know, because that's what

they're trying to do. They're trying to get her in a position where she's favoring Trump, get her off the case

What she did was she basically split the baby. So prosecutors wanted the trial to start December 2023, so that's right around the corner

Team Trump said that's too soon. We want it to start after the 2024 presidential election

Now, of course, prosecutors said that's way too far, and you know, we're treating him

special if that's the case. So she set the date, May 20th, 2024

Here's where it's good news for President Trump. It comes after the Republican primaries

So all other cases, New York, if Georgia brings a case, all other cases are going to be on

hold until after the federal cases. So starting in May 20th gives him, on May 20th, 2024, gives him the room to do his primary

campaign unimpeded. Here's where it could be bad news for Trump and the Republicans, unfortunately

If Trump is convicted, so say the trial date starts May 20th, so you get to May, you get

to June, you get to July. Let's say he's convicted August 2024 and he's found guilty

We're only a couple months away from the presidential election, and now we don't have a candidate

because he may be not legally able to be president at that point, and the Republicans would not

have a candidate, and you could not bill the candidate quick enough to take that spot

This would be almost like election interference, but via the legal system

So it's not illegal, but it's hard to determine another way of framing that other than election interference

The Republicans would not have a viable candidate in time, and Joe Biden would basically walk

into the White House. Now, I think this case is flimsy, and I think that, I personally think, this is just a matter

of opinion. I'm not a legal expert, didn't do a day of law school, but this is my personal opinion

as a layman just looking at the evidence and listening to experts

I believe with the particular jury he's going to have, too, in a very red county there

that it's very likely Trump will actually beat this case, and that would catapult him

I believe, in the election. And that would, you know, it would show people that what he was saying about this being a

witch hunt was true. If they then tried to scramble the next case to get it before the election, I think that

would really show what this actually is. The problem, though, does become that Trump is going to have to campaign for the presidency

provided he wins the Republican nomination, during the time of the trial

So there's a lot of moving parts here. I think, overall, I think this is good news for Trump because, overall, I believe he's

going to beat this case. But I want to know what you guys think

Overall, is this good news or bad news for Trump? Let me know in the comments

Also, again, please like, share, and subscribe. Again, we really appreciate it, and it helps us so much

I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody