'Can't Trust Her' - Judge Drops Hammer On Stormy Daniels

Hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the walls are closing

in on Stormy Daniels in a massive way. Before we get started please make sure you like, comment

share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue

to grow. Everybody knows by now Stormy Daniels gave disastrous testimony this week during the

Trump trial. She's continuously contradicted herself and even told a story about having

dinner with President Donald Trump. Now she told this story in her book and when cross-examined

had to admit that well they never had dinner but where she comes from having dinner with somebody

means you were together around dinner time. Now that doesn't make a lot of sense where I come from

if you say you had dinner with somebody and maybe it's different in different parts of the country you guys tell me in the comments but where I come from if you say you had dinner with somebody

you had dinner with them period. I mean that's the whole ball of wax that's why you said you

had dinner with them. So I don't really get it but a lot of things she said in this trial

she contradicted herself and on cross-examination she was a disaster. It was so bad that even

Ellie Honig of CNN said her cross-examination was disastrous and that the defense team really

dropped the hammer on her. Now there was a judge speaking and the judge said you can't trust her

you can't trust her story and that well a former judge and this is why her testimony was as

disastrous as it was. Now I want you to take a look at this clip and I want you to tell me what

you think. I think this case against Trump is dead and I think Michael Cohen's only going to make it

worse when he starts testifying on Monday but please let me know what you think when you like

comment, share, and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care everybody. Hired from the Queens County Supreme Court. Judge you have been there

inside of the courtroom watching. What has stood out to you today? Well what stood out to me is that Donald Trump's defense attorney cross-examining

Stormy Daniels, Susan Nicholas, really did her homework. She did exactly what a good defense

attorney is supposed to do. She looked at prior statements, she searched for inconsistencies

and she had she had some. In particular there was a lot of questioning about Stormy Daniels

giving an interview to some kind of a gossip magazine in 2011 where she appeared to allude

to having actually having dinner in the penthouse with Donald Trump at the time of the

the alleged event and the sexual encounter. She testified very clearly Tuesday on direct

examination that there was no dinner, there was hours of conversation, and no dinner. So you know

a defense attorney's job is to try and expose inconsistencies like that to get the juries to

start to think or possibly doubt. Well if you can't trust her on that kind of a detail, what

about the other details? Did they go that far that they'll call her entire that the jury would be

likely to call her entire testimony in doubt over that issue? I don't know, but the DA, the defense

attorney certainly did her job. Another point that was picked up on where they left off Tuesday on

cross-examination was whether or not Stormy Daniels was interested in money in connection

with the non-disclosure agreement that she had an attorney negotiate where she received $130,000

She continues to state her prime reason wasn't money, it was trying to stay safe

based on something else she spoke about about being threatened back in 2011. Although by her

own admission she never reported this threat to the police or made a timely report. So that was

all done and you know it was quite interesting and the jury has a lot to think about here

Yeah they sure do. I mean Susan Nicholas really trying to go after as you said the credibility

and the motivation of Stormy Daniels. A lot of focus on some I guess rather salacious details

The number of films that she was in as a