Dismissing The Case - Trump Scores Massive Court Victory

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the Supreme Court decision

in Trump's immunity case has already had reverberating effects. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe. Those little things

really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow. Also, if you are on the Trump

train in 2024, hit that join button and become a member of this channel and help us keep bringing

conservative news to the people. Folks, the Supreme Court decision on immunity was massive

It was a lot broader in scope than I had anticipated. I predicted a much narrower scope

that would apply only to specific cases here with former President Donald Trump. But this is a very

broad scope. Now, don't believe a lot of the doomsday scenarios that liberals are hitting

you with right now about SEAL Team 6 and otherwise. That's absolutely ridiculous

But it is very, very broad. And what does that mean? It means, according to some legal experts

and I'm going to show you one on a network that does not like former President Donald Trump

apparently, they're going to tell you Jack Smith's case looks like it's toast. The January 6th case

looks like it is complete toast. Smith is going to try, because that's what he does

to try to finagle a way to find a way to get this case to work. But the fact is

it's pretty much lifeless at this point. You know, they tore the wings off. As Trump said

on his Truth Social post, it was a high-level spanking to Jack Smith. And it really, really was

And that's what this case was really about. Now, it has reverberating effects on other cases. I'm

going to get into that in a subsequent video. But for this particular video, Jack Smith

his case is done. And I want you to listen to a legal expert here on CNN explain exactly why. And

then I want you to leave me your comments. Do you agree with the Supreme Court decision? Let me know

in the comments. Let's start with you. What's your reaction to how the president framed this

Well, it's a big, big victory for Donald Trump. It means that the January 6th case, the case

before Judge Chutkan in the District of Columbia, is at a minimum delayed until after the election

but I think will never be tried. Because if you look at how Chief Justice Roberts

framed the issue, he said that all official conduct is not only off limits for prosecution

but there can't even be any evidence presented about official conduct. And the definition of

official conduct is so broad that it seems to eat up the entire indictment, in my view

in the January 6th case. So I think either Judge Chutkan or an appeals court or the Supreme Court

will wind up dismissing the January 6th case because it involves official conduct

Judge Gertner, I saw you kind of shaking your head about that, but I want to read you part of

Sotomayor's dissent where she lists potential illegal conduct by a future president could

be shielded from prosecution by the ruling. She says, orders the Navy SEAL Team 6 to assassinate

a political rival, immune. Organizes a military coup to hold on to power, immune. Takes a bribe

in exchange for a pardon, immune. Is she correct? There's no question that it has been inoculated

Official acts have been inoculated. Even as to the non-official acts, even to the private actors

you know, the state electoral officials that Trump called, you have to prove that there's

no danger of intrusion on the authority of the executive branch. In other words, the bar

they have said, is quite high. There's still some room. I don't agree with Jeff, but one of the

things that's going to happen is that they've created such a complex factual test that even

as Judd Chotkin says, this is in and this is out, it'll go up to the Court of Appeals

it'll go up to the Supreme Court, and it will never be tried. And that I agree