Victory! - Trump Gets Fantastic News After Judge's Decision

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the bombshell Fannie Willis decision

The decision that she can stay on the case. That came in from the judge today

But it's actually really good news for former President Donald Trump. Let's get to it

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

What Judge Scott McAfee did here was kind of split the baby. Now you have to understand a couple of things about this, but let's get to the crux of it

Yes, Fannie Willis can stay on the case, but Nathan Wade has to go

Either Fannie Willis and her entire team have to go, or Nathan Wade has to go

Now Nathan Wade is the lead prosecutor in this case. This means it is highly unlikely, in fact almost impossible, that this case is going to happen before the election

And that's all Trump really wanted at the end of the day, was to get this case pushed back to after the election

This is a massive, massive victory for Donald Trump. Nathan Wade being removed from the case, the judge tore him to shreds

He didn't believe his testimony. He really didn't believe Fannie Willis' testimony

Called her unprofessional. He just said it didn't rise to the level

Rise to the level of dismissing the district attorney from the case

Understandable. Not great. But understandable. And why is it understandable? Well, he's a Fulton County judge. And he's up for re-election

Do the math. Do the math. If he removed Fannie Willis from this case, he might as well stop his re-election campaign in Fulton County, Georgia

It's Fulton County, Georgia. They may as well have named it Democrat County, Georgia

There's no chance he could win re-election. This can curry him some favor with voters

And I'm not casting aspersions on the judge, but I believe you can draw your own conclusions there

I want you to watch, though, this clip that explains why this is really bad news for Fannie Willis

Really great news for former President Donald Trump. So I want you to watch it, and then give me your thoughts

As always, please remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. So it's not a good thing. No lawyer wants to be in front of a judge, arguing motions, asking for things

Michael, hang on. We're going to jump in here, Michael. Michael, we're just going to jump in because we've got to get back to Paula Reed

She's got some more information from the actual ruling. Paula. Yeah, look, I do agree with Michael's point there about the timing on when this case can go forward

Fannie Willis originally said she wanted to bring it in August, this process, to attempt to disqualify her

It's certainly eaten up some time, but now there's another issue she needs to address

and that is the fate of the lead prosecutor for this investigation, Nathan Wade, who she had a romantic relationship with

The judge here, just like he had some harsh words for Fannie Willis, also has some pretty strong language related to Mr. Wade

Here he calls Wade's testimony, his explanation for some incorrect information that he submitted, quote

unpersuasive. He also describes his conduct as showing a willingness to wrongfully conceal his relationship with the district attorney

The judge said as the case moves forward, reasonable members of the public could easily be left to wonder whether the financial exchanges

between Wade and the district attorney have continued, resulting in some form of benefit to the district attorney

or whether the romantic relationship has resumed. I think you read between the lines you lied once, you could potentially lie again

or could reasonably think that the district attorney is not exercising her independent professional judgment

totally free of any compromising influences. He says, and here's the key quote

as long as Wade remains on this case, the unnecessary perception will persist

Basically saying because of what has happened during this process, what they've learned, the fact that Mr. Wade was not always honest with the court, he said this is going to hang this cloud of distrust

over this case, and he is suggesting that Nathan Wade needs to be removed

Now he does not, as I understand it, order him to be removed, but he's walking up to the line and saying he's got to go

Now, some people have previously called for Nathan Wade and or Fannie Willis to step aside

Neither one of them have done that. Neither one of them have given any indication they intend to do that

But it's impossible to see really how this case would go forward, certainly not before the election

with Mr. Wade at the helm, when you have a judge overseeing the case saying, look, he's got to go

For more information visit www.FEMA.gov