Chaos In The Senate - FBI Finally Admits The Truth About Evidence Against Biden

The Deputy FBI Director just got housed

in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm Carmine Sabia

This is Explain America. Please make sure before we get started that you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those things really help us out and help our channel continue to grow and spread the conservative message

So Josh Hawley had Deputy FBI Director Mr. Abate in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee

where he actually finally admitted something that the FBI was reticent to admit beforehand

The document that alleges that Joe Biden participated in a bribery scheme

with a Ukrainian official, well, it does exist. He admits this now in front of the world

No more hiding it. No more pretending it doesn't exist or we don't know or this or that

But there was more revelations about the document that happened. I want you to take a look at what happened

with Hawley and Abate and let's see. Senator Hawley. Thank you, Mr. Chairman

Mr. Abate, let me just stay with you. You just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question

that not releasing the 1023 or talking about it as a matter of life and death

question of life and death, you said. Explain. It is potentially a question of life and death

For whom? With regard to the source of the information. So, okay, so now we've confirmed that the document exists

That's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists. Why did he do that

We have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents. Yeah, after you first denied it

Now, when a member of this committee read it, right, the FBI, let's just get the record straight

The FBI director initially said it doesn't exist. Then Senator Grassley said, I've read it

Then he said, oh, okay, well, gotcha. I guess it does exist

Now you're going back and forth with members of this committee, what's in it. Why don't you just release it

Is it classified? The document is not classified. Okay, will you commit to releasing it

Senator, we'll take that back and we will work with you and this committee

How about just a yes or no? Will you commit to releasing this unclassified document

that alleges that the president of the United States, the president of the United States

has taken $5 million or more in bribes from a foreign nation

The document has already been released pursuant to a subpoena to the House Oversight Committee

Has it been released to this committee? We will work with this committee within the parameters that are established

to meet the request. Will you release the document to the public? It's unclassified. Don't you think the American people have a right to see it

Senator, the document, as you know, contains sensitive information that has bearing on the life

of the source of the information, potentially. You can redact the source's name

We do this all the time. In some instances, Senator, and I know you know this

that is not sufficient to protect people. And that's what we strive and work to do each and every day

And I hope you would take that seriously, too. Oh, I take it very seriously

But I also take seriously the fact that your institution has repeatedly abused its authority

has repeatedly targeted political opponents. Your institution is the one that went to the door

of pro-life protesters with SWAT teams to try and intimidate people because of their speech

Your institution is the one that treated parents as domestic terrorists because of their speech

Your institution is the one that, according to the court, the FISA court, ran 278,000 unwarranted

probably illegal queries on Americans, right? That was your institution, correct? With respect to the compliance incidents, yes

Some of the other things you cited, we can take them one by one. They are not

Compliance, you would characterize the unlawful querying 278,000 times of American citizens as compliance issues

We've said before, I've said that totally unacceptable. Who's been fired for it

Individuals involved are handled through the disciplinary process. Who's been fired for it

We have, in the case of the unintentional instance where something similar happened

we have fired people in the past. I'm sorry, what does that word salad mean

The unintentional instance where, what does that mean? Who's been fired for the 278,000 times

that you improperly or illegally queried the database for American citizens? Anybody

When we find intentional incidents. Well, you're saying that the 278,000 queries

were unintentional? I believe that's correct. Wow. 278,000 times American citizens information was queried

by your agency unintentionally? That's your testimony? I would wanna go back and check that, Senator

Well, that's what you just told me. My understanding is that the vast majority of the

Well, wait, that's different. You just said it was. You just said it was unintentional. Now it's the vast majority

Which is it? Do you know? So you don't know. Likely all

So first it was all of them, then it was vast majority. Now it's likely all

So you don't know is the answer to the question. I don't know the answer as we sit here today

but I will find out and I will get back to you. Who was fired for the lies to the

So as you can see, not only does the document exist, but it's also unclassified

There's no really good reason to keep it from the people. They say it's a matter of life and death

for the source of the information. Okay, fine, I get that. But as Hawley said, you can redact that information

It's done all the time. So what is it that you're protecting? What don't you want people to see

You can redact anything that can point to sources and methods. So why not just let the American people see this document

Let them see it. Let them judge for itself. The way you want to trot Donald Trump out there

on these charges with his classified documents, the way you didn't do to Hillary Clinton

and you want people to make a judgment on that? Let them make a judgment on this as well

Because it seems a lot like you want to really, really make the playing field uneven

That's what it seems like to me. I think the American people have a right to see this document

What do you guys think? Let me know in the comments. Again, please make sure you like, you share

and you subscribe as well. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody