Trump Hush Money Case Takes Drastic Turn - Judge Sends Word To Jury

Hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the Trump Stormy Daniels

Alvin Brack. Hush money trial, it's about to hit it's, well, climax

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

So the judge has made his decision, he's made the final call here on what the jury instructions

are going to be and he's going to give those instructions to the jury on Tuesday

Now this is making the liberals over at MSNBC, quote, very nervous

And I do find it curious that apparently the people involved in the case, the attorneys

involved in the case have not read the jury instructions yet. So they don't know what they're arguing in their closing arguments and that, well that

could be concerning for the defense and the prosecution. I find that curious

But Judge Juan Marchand has run such an insane circus of a kangaroo courtroom that really

nothing he does at this point surprises me. So this should be no different

He hasn't done things by the quote unquote rule book. He hasn't done things the way they're normally done and he continues to follow that pattern

of being a guy who I believe wants to be the next Judge Judy

I believe he wants to have the Judge Juan Marchand show. I think him and Alvin Bragg and Letitia James and Fannie Willis and all these people are

doing this for their own ego. This judge has run this case like an ego obsessed maniac, striking things down that just don't

that hurt the prosecution, allowing things for the prosecution that are ridiculous

This case has been so one sided. This judge is a hero in New York

He's a hero until this jury comes back and if they don't convict, a lot of people are

going to look ridiculous. I want you to watch this report on it and let me know what you think in the comments

when you like, comment, share and subscribe. I just want to let each of you, and I'll do ladies first, tell me what you expect to see

happen in these summations and can you just try to, I guess, anticipate for us what you

think those jury instructions might look like. Yes, so two really important questions Joy

You know, it's a little bit frustrating being a lawyer in a trial because in opening statement

all you can do is predict to the jury what you think the evidence will be

You can't make any arguments about what it means. You can't do that when you're asking witnesses questions

But closing argument, that's the time you get to let loose and share with the jury your

views of what the evidence means when you stack it all up together

You know, it doesn't always come in in sequential order. Sometimes we have these witnesses that we have to use to authenticate evidence or custodians

of records. This is the opportunity to explain to the jury, here's how all of the evidence adds

up to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. And these are extraordinarily good prosecutors

They've done a fine job. It's a tough case. I think we'll hear them arm the jurors with good arguments that they can take into the

room so that while they're deliberating, if there are some among the jury who are less

persuaded, they will have the evidence in the order that they need it to have that conversation

with their fellow jurors. And the jury instructions play a big role in that because they are the law that the

jurors are to apply. You know, there is this kerfuffle about whether or not Trump could put on an expert witness

about election law. And the judge said, no, that's my job. I get to tell the jury what the law is

That's what he'll do when he instructs them. The order, and I don't know if Andrew has this same reaction, it makes me just a little

bit uncomfortable. I'm used to having those instructions written in stone before I can argue so I can tell

the jury, here's what the judge will tell you about the law. And my understanding is that that may happen a little bit differently here

But ultimately, the judge is the authority who tells the jurors what law to use