Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Texas Republican
0:05
Senator Ted Cruz just went off. Before we get started, please make certain you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:13
Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow
0:18
You know when you're a Republican and you do media appearances, things always get hectic
0:23
because you know the media is trying to trap you, they're trying to catch you, they're trying to use gotcha questions, right, to paint you into a corner
0:31
This is what they do. It's how they get paid. It's how they make their living
0:35
This is what the media does. The media, in a lot of respects, most of the mainstream media in my opinion, is an arm
0:41
of the Democrat National Committee, the propaganda arm. Well, Ted Cruz appeared with Kaitlyn Collins who, believe it or not, started her career
0:50
working for a conservative organization but has been anything but conservative during
0:56
her time and tenure at CNN. So he appears on The Source with Kaitlyn Collins and she tries to badger him about accepting
1:04
the results of the 2024 election as if it's a foregone conclusion that Joe Biden is going
1:10
to win it. And you have to keep in mind that Democrats have a long storied history of not accepting
1:16
election results and challenging election results in Congress. We can go back, I think it was, you know, to Reagan with Democrats challenging election results
1:27
So this goes back decades. Republicans do it and it's the end of democracy
1:33
So she tries to corner Ted Cruz at this question and well, it didn't go as planned
1:38
Let's take a look. You were the first senator to object to the vote
1:43
In 2024, will you certify the election results? Do you plan to object or will you accept the results regardless of who wins the election
1:51
So Kaitlyn, I got to say, I think that's actually a ridiculous question
1:55
It's a yes or no question. No, it's not. Let me explain why it's a ridiculous question
1:59
It's not a question. You've ever asked a Democrat that? Of course. What Democrat
2:03
But what Democrats? Hold on a second. What Democrats challenge it? What Democrats
2:07
I know, I know. I've been down this road many times. No Democrat
2:11
You cannot compare the two situations. We have talked about that. We've seen the audio of that when they protested on the Senate floor
2:17
But hold on a second. But have they ever, has you ever had a sitting president who refused to facilitate the peaceful
2:22
transition of power, refused to acknowledge that his successor won the presidency
2:28
So A, we did have a peaceful transfer of power. I was there on January 20th
2:31
I was there on the swearing-in. Barely. B, if you look at in 2000 Democrats went to the Senate, or 2001, Democrats went to the
2:40
Senate floor and objected to George W. Bush. In 2004- And what did the president do
2:46
In 2016 Democrats went and objected to Donald Trump. And so- And what happened in 2016
2:53
Because I remember a guy named Joe Biden was vice president, and he went to the Senate
2:57
floor and certified the votes. So do you want- Am I wrong
3:01
So you're asking, will you promise no matter what to agree an election is illegitimate
3:06
regardless of what happens? And that would be an absurd thing to claim
3:09
Like we have an entire election law system that people challenge elections, elections
3:14
get overturned, voter fraud gets proven. That happens all the time. And the media engages in this weird game post Donald Trump that you insist no voter fraud
3:23
has ever existed. Why does every state have laws in place to challenge voter fraud if it occurs
3:29
Why do you have election challenges? The media doesn't- This isn't a game. There was no widespread voter fraud
3:33
It is a game. You only ask Republicans that. You ask- Because it was Republicans who tried to block the transition of power
3:40
You have to acknowledge that. We've never seen it on a scale of what happened in 2020, and we've never seen the president refuse
3:46
He wouldn't even let Joe Biden get classified briefings at the beginning. I recall that
3:50
So my question for you again, free and fair election, will you accept the results regardless
3:55
of who wins? Look, if the Democrats win, I will accept the result, but I'm not going to ignore fraud
4:01
regardless of what happens. But was there fraud in 2020? Of course there was fraud in 2020. No, there wasn't, and you still objected
4:06
Oh, you know for a fact there was zero voter fraud. Really
4:09
What's your basis for that? Show me your evidence. We've spoken with Governor Kemp. They did three hand recounts in the state of Georgia
4:14
The director of CISA said that it was the safest, most legitimate election in United
4:19
States history. But you're saying zero voter fraud occurred. That's what you just said. These are
4:23
Nothing that would have changed the outcome of that election. Okay, but that's a different statement. No, it's not, because it wouldn't have changed- Yes, it is
4:27
You said there was no voter fraud. There was no voter fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election, and you know that, Senator
4:31
So what I know is that what I stood on the Senate floor and objected, what I called for
4:36
I'll tell you, I wrestled with what to do in that circumstance. The reason I wrestled with it is because I think there was significant voter fraud in 2020
4:47
You wanted the 10-day commission, I know. But was there voter fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election? But do you know why I wanted a 10-day commission
4:52
Because I tried to look, I'm a Supreme Court litigator, I argue cases in front of the Supreme Court
4:57
I know. I tried to look through history and precedent, and the best precedent I could find was the
5:01
election of 1876. 1876 was between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden
5:06
What happened there, there were serious allegations of voter fraud, and Congress didn't throw
5:11
its hands up and say, you know what? CNN demanded that I accept the results no matter what, so ignore the fraud, I gotta go
5:19
It's not- But hold on, what did Congress do in 18- It's the President of the United States. How did the President
5:23
What did Congress do in 1876? How did the President handle it? What did Congress do in 1876? Senator, I have to know, you can't answer yes or no to this question
5:27
I'm asking a question. I'm asking a question. What did Congress do in 1876? You can't answer yes or no to this question. Republicans
5:32
Can you answer my question? Why are you refusing to answer my question? I'm conducting the interview with all due respect, Senator
5:37
And let me ask you, Republicans have twisted themselves in knots. It's just a yes or no question
5:43
I'm not twisting myself, I'm answering your question. You just don't like my answer. And what's your answer? Is it yes or is it no
5:47
So in 1876, what Congress did is it appointed an election commission
5:51
It consisted of 15 people, five House members, five senators, five Supreme Court justices
5:56
The election commission was charged with studying the evidence and making a determination of
6:01
what voter fraud occurred and that determined the winner. And what I called for in 2020 was to do the same thing, appoint an election commission
6:09
and 11 senators joined me. Senator, with all due respect, after it had been thrown out of many courts, after the
6:14
attorney general Bill Barr- Why was it thrown out? Because there was no basis for those court cases
6:18
So that's actually not- Senator, with all due respect- Okay, you asked me a question. Do you want me to answer it
6:22
And you didn't answer the question. Yes, I did. Dozens of court cases were thrown out. Hold on a second
6:26
The attorney general said there was no widespread fraud. You're not clearly answering the question. I want to thank you for that. What question am I not answering
6:30
I'm answering every question. I think the country would have been a lot better off with a determination of what evidence
6:36
of voter fraud occurred. And instead, the media didn't want to hear it and insist voter fraud never occurs
6:44
You ought to go back and look at the Carter-Maker Commission. Wasn't the media, it was the attorney general and my question was about 2024
6:48
It was the media. It was CNN that relentlessly pushed- My question was about 2024, Senator
6:52
Relentlessly pushed that propaganda. And by the way, never holds- What propaganda
6:56
That there was no widespread fraud in the election? That voter fraud doesn't exist and anyone who says it does is wearing a tinfoil hat
7:01
That is propaganda. And by the way, you never asked Hillary Clinton this
7:05
You never asked Stacey Abrams this. You never asked Al Gore this. With all due respect, Senator- And every one of them
7:09
With all due respect, Senator- Said the Republicans who won were illegitimate. I haven't had any of them on my show
7:13
We'll talk to them. But I don't remember there being a president who was refusing to turn over the transition
7:18
of power and facilitate it. And Trump didn't either. Joe Biden became president. My question was about 2024
7:22
You did not answer it. But thank you for coming on the show. Let me say a final point for you. You said they haven't come
7:26
Thank you very much, Senator Ted Cruz. I think you ought to come to your show. Senator Ted Cruz, no answer to that question
7:30
Thank you very much. Much more on that interview and what we touched on
Government
News
Politics
Campaigns & Elections
Media Critics & Watchdogs
Political Polls & Surveys


