'I Just Told You!' Jeanine Pirro Torches Liberal Cohost In Fiery Confrontation On 'The Five'

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Explain America. I'm your host, Carmine Sabia, and the Five just got wild

Before we get started, folks, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

I know I ask it all the time, but it really does help our channel grow, and it helps us to keep spreading the conservative message

We do so much appreciate it, so thank you for doing that. So Janine Piro, you know her. She's never going to back down from anybody, right

Well, her liberal co-host on the Five, Jessica Tarlov, took issue with the whistle

blowers in the Hunter Biden Joe Biden investigation. You know, the IRS whistleblowers who came

forward to say that the Department of Justice and top people at the Department of Justice

stepped in to get the case to move favorably towards Hunter Biden, help him get that sweetheart

deal that he got in the plea agreement. But Janine Piro didn't stop. She was hammering her

with questions about these whistleblowers. And Tarlov did not want to let her speak. Piro still got

her point across though. Let's take a look. Let's go back to a yet another di-com

where we've got these two whistleblowers. One is a high-level career IRS agent

The other, and this individual has spent years in the criminal investigations

And then we've got a second whistleblower, and neither of them has a political axe to grind

They talk about Rob Walker, the guy who set up the LLCs

saying that Joe Biden actually made an appearance at a meeting with Hunter and that Walker and the others set up the deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate C

And then we've got Bob Alinsky, who has already told us that a Navy lieutenant retired, that Joe Biden came into another meeting with Hunter and the Chinese

And specifically, that there was money, a percentage put aside for the big guy, was held, quote

separately with the association hidden? Who do you believe there? Big if true

The same thing that you have to say about all of this. I mean, James Comer and Chuck Grassley, Jim Jordan, Nancy Mays have all gone on TV and talked

about things like this. And it's a very intricate story. I can't follow all of it

I don't know all the names as well as you do. But I know that they haven't been able to produce the goods yet

We were promised tapes a week and a half. go by Chuck Grassley. No, well, I'm not asking about the tapes. I'm asking you about the whistleblowers

But I'm giving you a complete answer that will involve the whistleblowers. I just want to say

for the record, that the informant that Rudy Giuliani talked about missing, Giuliani had to recant on that

Chuck Grassley, more highly respected than the rest of them talked about tapes. So we're going to go to the history of whistleblowers

So okay so let get to Gary Shappley one of your whistleblowers the career guy There are three core claims that he made about what went on that have already been refuted First and foremost he said that Garland lied to Congress saying that Weiss had total authority

He did. I just told you we did. You don't know to that. A United States attorney did not make a decision without going to the United States attorney

Weiss himself told Jim Jordan on June 7th that that was not true. And then he did have complete authority

Who is he's going to say that? It wants to keep his job at this point. He delivered the goods, which was to deliver no goods

Could you just let me get through it and then you can keep going

The second point about this, he alleged Shappley, that Weiss asked to be a special counsel

which you already talked about, and Garland has refuted that. If you want to just say that everybody in Christendom is a liar, that's one thing

But I'm going to trust the Attorney General, especially one who testified under oath. Third point

Shapley alleges that there was political interference and that Weiss was denied the right to charge Hunter Biden in D.C

Now the D.C. U.S. attorney got in touch, went to the Washington Post last night, and he said that's absolutely not true, that he could have been charged anywhere

So there was no political interference whatsoever. I have maintained from the beginning that if all of what you say is true and they're, you know, like the gaudies, that I will believe you if the facts are shown to me and I'm not

I can actually see it. And there are direct lines between all of this That has not been done yet And this whistleblower having three core components to their testimony about what happened being refuted already They not refuted

They are. They're not refuted. What if 50% of it is true? As you can see, their Puro is not afraid of anybody

She's going to come at you when she's got the facts on her side. And the facts here are these whistleblowers have alleged some very, very damning things

The text message alone that shows Hunter Biden threatening a Chinese Communist Party

businessman with his father, that's super damaging. And the White House, of course, is playing it off

like they don't know nothing about it. But come on. We all know what's going on here. These whistleblowers

why would they come forward and lie about all of the things they've said, about Hunter getting

special treatment, about the text messages, about any of it? Why would they lie? They have no reason to

lie. In fact, the White House has not even disputed the authenticity of that text message. So the

Whistleblowers have no reason to lie. They have a track record, one of them at least has a track record of providing good information

So, you know, these people the FBI have used before. There's no reason to deny or question their credibility

Tarlov doesn't want to answer the hard questions because they're hard and because they hurt good old Joe

Folks, I want to thank you again for watching. Again, I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. I'm gonna