Matt Gaetz Drops Bombshell Biden Impeachment News - They Got Him

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine's AB of 4, Explain America, and Matt Gates just laid out the case and laid out the host who was saying Biden should not be impeached

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

Matt Gates, you know, went on CNN, he went into the lion's den, and there was a lot of back and forth about

why Biden shouldn't be impeached right now, the arrest of Alexei Smyranoff for lying to the FBI

about the bribe that he said Hunter and Joe Biden took a $5 million from Burisma

that the FBI is now saying is a lie, which is why he was arrested

Republicans based a lot of their impeachment inquiry on the testimony of Mr. Smyranov

Now that's in a lot of doubt. And Abby Phillip, the host at CNN

she thought she had Gates dead to rights. but she didn't. Gates actually took her to school

and gave the actual reasons why Biden should be impeached, and it goes a lot deeper than Smyranov

I want you to watch this video and then let me know what you think when you like, comment, share, and subscribe

I'm Carmine Sebya 4 Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. Is that true? I personally debriefed the whistleblower who initially identified

this 1023 alleged a bribe with the Biden family. And that whistleblower told us at the time that he did not know whether or not that

bribe had actually been consummated, but merely the existence of a 1023 that the FBI wasn't

providing to Congress warranted further review Now when we initially asked for this 1023 we were told by the Department of Justice it got all these national security implications We have to protect this confidential human source

So now what we have to decipher is which arm of the Department of Justice was telling us the truth

Because in these indictments that you see from Weiss, there are all these allegations that Smyranoff

could not have possibly observed these instances of bribery because he wasn't in the countries stated

but when we were debriefing the U.S. attorney from Pittsburgh, we got a very different version of events

Scott Brady told us that they could verify this travel record. So we got to figure out which part of the DOJ was telling the truth and which was

What Ken Buck is saying was that Congress, people in Congress, were warned that this confidential source, what he was providing could not be verified

Is that part something that you were ever told? Directly. And so given that, should be

Should that not have produced some more caution on the part of your colleagues, James Comer, Jim Jordan, as they talked about the value of this, the information that this source had provided

I think what they talked about was the extent to which DOJ was entangled with this particular source, the number of cases he'd been involved in, the number of successful prosecutions based off that information

I want to play for you what they said, but they called it basically a lynchpin of the investigation

Listen. The most corroborating evidence we have is that 1023 form from this highly credible confidential human source

Every day, this bribery scandal becomes more credible. We already know the president took bribes from Burisma

I also want to add, betraying your country is treason. This, ladies and gentlemen, is gold

This is direct evidence of naked corruption and bribery. The evidence is overwhelming Maria you know the nails in the coffin Was that irresponsible A few of those characterizations might have been a little a little oversawed

But I do think that the bribery can also go to a family member, right

The reason I think it's still bribery, though, Abby, is because if you want to bribe a 75-year-old man, you pay their kids

But here's a thing, here's a thing. You just acknowledge there's actually no evidence of bribery

When it comes to what this confidential source had to. I did not acknowledge that

You acknowledge that there's no proof, there's reports of bribery, but there's actually no proof of bribery actually being consummated

I think that when you pay someone's family member in order to influence their decision, that that is a bribe

Now, I recognize that that's probably not a view of bribery that's going to lead to an impeachment in the House

But yeah, like, how do you think you bribe old people? You pay their kids and their family members

I mean, you can, in your mind, think about it however you want, but from a constitutional and even for, from a constitutional and even

from a legal perspective, that's, you acknowledge your, I think you should read the Foreign

Pro Practices Act again. Look, I just want to ask you, though, you know that in the Foreign Pro Practices Act, payment to a family member can constitute a right. Here's what you said

Congressman. This was in October at a private fundraiser. You said, I don't believe that we are

endeavoring upon a legitimate impeachment of Joe Biden. They're trying to engage in a forever

war of impeachment. And like so many of our forever wars, it will drag on forever and end in a bloody

draw. It honestly, it seems like maybe you were right the first time. When you've heard me speak

about issues important to me, I haven't led with impeachment. I talk about the budget and single

subject spending bills and term limits and things like that. Your colleagues, given that

according to Jim Jordan, this was the most corroborating piece of evidence that they had

Should they drop this impeachment at this point I disagree with Jordan that this is what most corroborating I think what most corroborating are the payments to Hunter Biden and Frank Biden and James Biden I was deposing James Biden and the way that they took money

from the Chinese government would make your skin crawl. Now, that's admittedly James Biden

not Joe Biden, but I do believe when these foreign governments are loading up

the entire Biden family apparatus with cash, they're not doing so to extract some sort of skill

or service from these naredwell Bidens. They're doing it to influence Joe Biden

that you've described is an inference. It's basically saying, well, it must

be, but there's actually no, you haven't actually given any proof of what you're alleging

But, Abby, why do you think Burisma was paying Hunter Biden? Do you think they were paying him to

figure out where to go buy crack in L.A? In the absence of actual proof, in the absence of actual proof

but that is as you said earlier, is this impeachment inquiry even

going anywhere if you cannot provide enough evidence? Jonathan Turley, a conservative lawyer, he was brought

before the committee to testify about this. He said there's not enough evidence to support articles of impeachment against Joe Biden

Yeah, when Jonathan Turley said that, we should have asked Jamal Bowman to pull a fire alarm. It was a devastating moment for House Republicans

But I think the impeachment inquiry will have to rely on deciphering whether or not it was Weiss or Brady accurately assessing the travel of Smyranoff

That's what the impeachment inquiry ought to be about? Or shouldn't it be about whether or not you actually have proof of bribery

Well, let's assume that Brady's right, that Smyranoff indeed was in these places making these observations

And I'm not saying he is. I'm saying it's a contradiction. In that event, you could literally have a situation where Smyrna off is being arrested to facilitate the cover up

Now, again, I think that requires us reviewing the travel records and getting more transparency out of the Department of Justice, more than they've been willing to give us to date