Donald Trump Prosecutor Jack Smith Gets Devastating News - Judge Denies His Request
Jul 26, 2024
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Smith got rocked by decision - https://explainamerica.com/2865865/
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Explain America. I'm your host Carmine Sabia. And
0:04
Jack Smith, the special prosecutor who's taking the federal classified documents case against
0:10
Trump, well he just got some bad news from the judge in the case. Let's take a look at
0:15
it. But before we get started folks, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:21
Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow. So
0:25
Jack Smith petitioned Judge Eileen Cannon. Now you may remember Judge Eileen Cannon
0:30
She was the one who was appointed by former President Donald Trump. And she has made a
0:35
lot of pro-Trump decisions in recent times that have had liberals furious with her. You
0:41
know, they're considered pro-Trump decisions. I call them legal decisions. But whatever
0:45
the case is, she's made them and liberals are furious. What else is new? Film at 11
0:50
So Judge Eileen Cannon was asked by Jack Smith to keep the witness list of 84 potential
0:57
witnesses against Trump private. Now these are 84 potential witnesses in the case that
1:02
Trump is supposed to not be allowed to be in contact with. But he wanted to keep it
1:09
private. Now Trump's team just got the witness list. Okay, so they have it. But what happened
1:14
was NBC News, ABC News, the Associated Press, CNN, other news outlets, they want the list
1:21
of potential witnesses. Now Smith is saying, no, this would damage his case. And he doesn't
1:27
want this to be known to you people, the public, the American people. He doesn't want you to
1:31
get to know who the witnesses are against former President Donald Trump. But Eileen
1:36
Cannon, she smacked him down. She said she sees no reason that the list should be kept
1:41
secret. And I think she's right. She said, look, there's, you know, the people who, the
1:45
news organizations who were arguing for the case to be public, they said, this is historic
1:50
They said, it's hard to actually overstate how historic this is. I tend to agree with
1:54
that assessment. This is historic. And I think we do need to know, or at least we want to
1:58
know, the curiosity is there, right? Who were the 84 people that turned on Donald Trump
2:03
I think everybody wants to know that. If you're a Trump supporter, who were the 84 people
2:07
that stabbed Trump in the back? Let's, let's find out about that. Right? So I think that's
2:11
a big part of what happened here. People just want to know this. And the judge said
2:17
look, you don't have a compelling argument. She said to Smith, you don't have a compelling
2:20
argument to keep this list secret. So you need a compelling argument. You need a reason
2:25
that it's going to put something in danger. It's going to put the case in danger. It's going to put national security in danger. Something has to be compelling her to keep
2:32
this list private. Otherwise it would be public. Apparently she didn't feel that Smith's argument
2:37
was strong enough for what he believed was a compelling argument. And so therefore she
2:43
decided against him. And this is of course, another drawback for Smith, who has also asked
2:48
for an extension in the case because he said that Trump's attorneys need to get their security
2:52
clearances together. So a lot has been going against Smith lately. And this whole case
2:57
might be falling apart right before our very eyes. Folks, I want to thank you for watching
3:01
again. I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you
3:06
Take care, everybody
Law & Government
Politics
People & Society


