'Total Disqualification' - Fani Willis gets Disastrous News After Unhinged Testimony

Hello ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and

some bad news coming for Fanny Willis after her crazy testimony yesterday

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

I assume most of you at this point have seen at least some of Fanny Willis's unhinged testimony and

she really did herself no favors. Fanny, what were you doing? It was brutal. If a defendant acted that way with her

she would go crazy in the courtroom. She would have the judge admonish them, but she

was acting like she was in some kind of rap video or something. It was really weird and unhinged and off the hook

Well, Alan Dershowitz, famed legal scholar and Democrat, actually weighed in on this and he said there should be a total disqualification of Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade

from this case based on them lying to the court about their relationship

He believes that the attorneys on the other side have actually proven what they're claiming about Willis

and that this should end Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade being on this case

I want you to watch this video and then I want your opinions on it. So please leave them in the comments. As always

please remember to like, comment, share and subscribe. It really does help us out. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. It would need to be, in my view, Professor, a new venue

Again, unqualified, overpaid, lead attorney, being paid an exorbitant amount of money, the DA

benefiting from that money, lavish vacations, I believe that this case now needs to be dropped and I'll take it a step further

What happens to all the people that made plea deals? A lot of people make plea deals not because they're guilty

because it takes the possibility of jail off the table and removes that pressure. Would you agree with that characterization

I certainly would and the people who pleaded guilty will probably seek to undo their pleas unless they are

satisfied with the result. For me, the issue is perjury. There is a plausible case, not an ironclad case, a

plausible case that the two of them both committed perjury. He seems clearly to have committed perjury, if not in the courtroom, in answering his

interrogatories where he swore under oath, essentially, that he did not have sex between the time he was married and the date he signed that

admitting, however, that he did have sex when he thought the marriage was broken down

That's one thing. The second thing is this is a she-said, they-said

confrontation. We have a witness who seems completely plausible, who said that she admitted that she had a relationship with him

during the period of time when she denied doing it. One witness against two witnesses, but remember she testified under oath

hey, all you need for proof is one witness's testimony. There was one witness, her friend, who testified that there was sex during the period of time that they denied it

So I think there's a plausible case for perjury here, but I think there's an open and shut case for

disqualification based on the appearance of impropriety. Look, when you admit that you paid for all these trips on your credit cards

then the burden of proof shifts to the other side to demonstrate that there was payback in cash

And the fact that there are no records and the payments all have records, but the repayments have no records

gives rise to a plausible interpretation that that's not true, that there was financial benefit that accrued

to the district attorney. Therefore, there's more than enough for the judge to say, at least an appearance of impropriety

total disqualification of the office, start from scratch, put the case in a different district

Let's see if an independent prosecutor thinks there's enough here for a RICO prosecution

Do you believe