BREAKING: Supreme Court Delivers Massive Decision On Disqualifying Trump For 2024

Hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the Supreme Court

has stepped in on a motion to remove former President Donald Trump from certain 2024 election

ballots which would all but doom his presidential hopes and campaigns. Before we get started folks as always and ever I ask you to please like and share this

video in addition to commenting and subscribing. In particular liking and sharing helps us from suffering the same fate as CNN and we

can keep bringing these to you for free every day. So here's what's going on

Former President Donald Trump was sued by an unknown, I'm not even going to bother to mention the guy's name here, his last name is Castro, who cares, he's a nobody

he's running for the Republican nomination. But he really is a nobody in this race

He sued to keep Trump off the ballot as if that would do something for his campaign

This is a guy who's not been on a debate stage, has not even come close to qualifying

for a debate, he's ridiculous. But he can bring the case and he did

So he brings the case to court, the lower courts throw it out, but then he brings it

to the Supreme Court and he cites the 14th amendment, namely section 3 of the 14th amendment

which states that anybody who engages in an insurrection against the United States

or provides aid and comfort to those who did have an insurrection against the United States

would be disqualified from holding the presidency, the vice presidency, governor, senator, congressman

Now this was enacted after the Civil War. The reason for this was to keep Confederates out of the federal government

See the people who were writing that amendment, they were very concerned that the people who

ran the Confederacy would then try to take over the Union by getting into government

and by getting into government and changing things to the Confederacy but doing it through elections

Personally, I'm not a fan of the amendment to begin with. If the people wanted to vote them in, they should have the right to vote them in, but

we can't re-litigate this back in the 1800s. This is now being used against Donald Trump by various people

Castro is one of them. The Supreme Court delivered an epic smackdown on this

They just dismissed it out of hand. No vote, no commentary, just dismissed it

Now Castro insists that this is because they believe he didn't have standing, but because

he's now on a ballot in a state, he believes he does have standing

Okay, fine. There's two other cases that are about to come before the Supreme Court that are going

to challenge Trump's eligibility to be on the 2024 election ballot. Even CNN said these are long shots

I mean, if you guys think he's so bad for the country and you believe, as you say, that

the American people can see how bad he is for the country, why are you worried about

having them vote? Why are you worried about having the American people have their voice heard

You say you want to save democracy, but you want to save democracy by limiting choices

That's the antithesis of democracy. So to do that is absolutely ridiculous, and to say you're doing it in the name of democracy

is even more ridiculous than that. Castro had no standing. He also had no case, and I don't believe these other cases stand a chance either

I want to know what you guys think. Is this a way that the Democrats and certain Republicans are trying to get away, get around

the democratic process, or do they have a case here in your opinion

I want to know what you guys think. Also, please remember to like, share, and subscribe. It really helps us out

I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody