'Federal Constitutional Violations' - After Trump Verdict Judge Gets Smacked Down

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia here for Explain America on a dark day

in American history. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

President Donald Trump just moments ago was found guilty on 34 ridiculous felony counts

resurrected from an 8-year-old misdemeanor that they had to cobble into a felony case

District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who campaigned on getting Trump, just like Letitia James

campaigned on getting Trump in a kangaroo court, got 34 felony convictions

And now Judge Womershawn, the conflicted judge whose daughter made millions of dollars

for her clients off of this case, the judge whose daughter has made a fortune for herself

off of this case, the judge who donated to Joe Biden and donated to anti-Republican causes

now finds himself in a serious, serious problem. Because there are federal constitutional violations here

And on appeal, and this appeal I have no doubt will overturn this verdict, but it will be

after the election, so they're getting what they want, the Democrats, or so they think

this judge, he may see the end of his legal career because of this on appeal

The federal constitutional violations in this are staggering, but you don't have to take

my word for it. I want you to listen to what Jonathan Turley, a great legal mind, has had to say after the

verdict on exactly what we just saw. Watch this, and then give me your thoughts and opinions in the comments

This may reflect this trial court decision. On that, what is your confidence in the appellate division or the appellate process here in

New York? This case is a little different because, quite frankly, I think the level of reversible error

here really is quite considerable. It runs the waterfront of procedural to constitutional problems, including federal constitutional violations

I don't even see how you can meet the unanimity requirement in the way that this thing was instructed

Yeah, they were unanimous that some crime was being committed on that secondary crime

but it's apparently between the jurors and God as to what that crime was, unless there's

going to be some release of a jury form. We haven't seen that jury form, so we don't know

Was there any indication when you were inside that we would, or that there was a special verdict form

No, and so we were all hoping that there might be a form that might bring clarity on that issue

But, no, I think that in the end, you're going to have a reversal

I'm fairly confident of that. Now, in the New York appellate system, they have ruled for Trump

There are very good lawyers in the New York system, and credible people who want this

system to work the way it's designed. I got to tell you, I am eternally an optimist

I was an optimist about a hung jury, and I'm an optimist now about the appellate judges

I think at some point, people will step forward and say, enough

You know, hating this man is not enough to forget the lack of the evidence

And once again, I do not blame this jury. They were given instructions that made it very easy to convict, and some of them might

not have seen a real option not to, given how low these standards seem. Okay

Jonathan Turley, Trey Gowdy, and Andy McCarthy, it's been a long several weeks here