Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and there was a moment of
0:05
triumph for former president Donald Trump so fantastic that MSNBC called it a moment of
0:12
triumph. Before we get started please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:18
Those little things really, really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow
0:23
You know I'm starting to think that Alvin Bragg is going to become the scapegoat
0:27
of the Democrats. I think they're going to pile on him. I think he's going to become a laughing
0:31
stock and a punchline after this Trump case is over because I don't think he's going to get a
0:35
conviction. Very well might get an acquittal in New York in a case that he thought I think he
0:42
believed would make him a star, make him maybe a possible governor candidate or attorney general
0:47
of the state candidate if Letitia James goes for being governor and it might just destroy his
0:52
career like it's doing to Fannie Willis. Well they were talking about the case on MSNBC and they said
0:58
that his star witness, Bragg's star witness Michael Cohen was so horrific on cross-examination
1:05
and it was such a moment of triumph for former president Donald Trump that it may lead
1:11
to Trump not getting convicted. MSNBC guys, MSNBC they practically work for the Democrat party
1:18
you know what I'm saying? So for them to say it you know it's it's serious. It's very severe for
1:24
for Alvin Bragg, very serious for Alvin Bragg. I want you to watch this video. Let me know what you
1:30
think. As always please remember to like, comment, share and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for
1:35
Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care everybody. When he finally went to the
1:43
facts of this case when he started talking about the harassing phone calls that Cohen was getting
1:48
I think a bunch of us looked at each other sort of quizzically being like what is this? Where is this
1:52
going? And then it became clear when he first brought up the text to Keith Schiller on October
1:58
24th after getting Cohen to re-establish that that was the day on which he called Schiller to reach
2:04
Trump and that remains his testimony that he discussed with Trump that day the resolution
2:09
of the Stormy Daniels matter and that it was time to pay out Stormy. Once he connected up to
2:14
the Keith Schiller text I thought uh-oh we're in for something here and indeed we were because
2:19
Michael Cohen not only admitted that he is now less than certain about what got discussed that
2:26
day and that it could have been both but he's not positive given the one minute and 30 something
2:31
seconds of that phone call but also that in eight years he had never seen that Keith Schiller text
2:38
and that it was not among the things that the district attorney's office had shown him. That
2:43
makes the district attorney's office look sloppy in addition to making Michael Cohen seem like
2:49
a self-assured either fabricator, liar, or forgetful person. It casts doubt on the veracity of
2:56
a ton of his testimony and not just about who he did or didn't talk to on October 24th or October
3:02
26th. It sort of casts lots of his testimony in doubt given the passage of time and makes the
3:08
district attorney's office look terrible all in one breath. This is a moment of real triumph for
3:14
Todd Blanche. You could even hear it in his voice. He is not a person to get excitable very easily
3:32
you
News
Scandals & Investigations
Politics
Media Critics & Watchdogs
Other


