'Serious Problem' - Judge Smacks Down Trump Prosecutor

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Special Prosecutor

Jack Smith has a serious problem on his hands. He's getting destroyed. Before we get started

please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe. Those little things really help us

out and they help our channel continue to grow. And if you're on the Trump train for 2024

smash that join button, become a member of this channel and get cool, free, exclusive content

So Judge Cannon, Judge Eileen Cannon, I love her. I want her to go to the Supreme Court

She is smacking down Jack Smith and liberals all over TV are having a fit. They want her off the

case. They want her recused. They want her removed. They want her to do the hokey pokey

They want all kinds of things because they can't stand that there's a judge out there who's, you

know, doing this crazy thing called following the actual law, who's actually doing things that are

not just let's get Trump. You know, they're used to Judge Mershawn and Judge Ngorin and all these

judges that do their bidding. And they didn't run into that here with Judge Eileen Cannon. No

they ran into a force and Smith, he was smacked down. The judge told them, I don't appreciate

your tone when Smith's team was going at her and like being nasty with her because she's not going

to give them the gag water they're seeking. I'm telling you that right now. They want a gag water

on Trump. She realizes that this man has to speak at a debate. He has to speak at presidential

rallies. There's nobody's in danger here. There's no reason for a gag water except you want to affect

the outcome of a presidential election. That's why you want him silenced. Forget everything else

Jack Smith. You are a rogue special prosecutor who's been smacked down and unanimously overturned

by the Supreme Court before. You are out of control and that's why they picked you. You think

you're Elliott Ness, but you're Elliott less. Let's take a look at this meltdown and then let

me know what you think in the comments. To be fair, they are arguments that have been made

before unsuccessfully. Defendants commonly challenged the qualifications, the serviceability of the independent counsel and fail. I think she wants to kick the tires a little bit on this

make sure she understands the law. She invited amicus participation, meaning not parties to

the case. Anyone else want to come in and law professors and others to come in and argue before

again, all very unusual. But this is an unusual case. And she seemed to be frustrated with the

prosecution repeatedly telling them she didn't like their attitude. Oh, absolutely. That was

one of the most striking things from yesterday's hearing is that the prosecutors came in

They presented their arguments as to why the gag order on Trump should be expanded

And so surprisingly, Judge Cannon went after the prosecutors for adopting an inappropriate

tone toward her. And it ultimately led the prosecutors to actually apologize to her

But look, the prosecutor, this isn't a mystery to them anymore. They know how Judge Eileen Cannon

views them and maybe views this case. So how should that color how they go forward

Well, look, I think they have to understand what they're dealing with here. They are not going to deal. They're not dealing with a judge that generally sees their case favorably and they

have to act accordingly. I think that they are making these motions because they do have a

legitimate concern that former President Trump's comments were placing the safety of FBI agents

in danger. So they had to make those arguments. They presented them. I think they learned a

little bit of a lesson and that they're going to probably try to tone back the approach that they take with this judge because she doesn't like it when they get aggressive with her

But these are the arguments the prosecutors have to make. One of the things the defense is going to try to do is get Evan Corcoran, who was a lawyer for

Yeah