Up next in 10
Days Before Inauguration Trump Enemies Make One Last Desperate Attempt To Stop Him
Jan 15, 2025
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine
0:01
Sabia for explain America and they are
0:04
not giving up that easy before we get
0:07
started please make sure you like
0:09
comment share and subscribe those little
0:11
things really help us out and they help
0:13
our Channel continue to grow and if
0:15
you're not watching us on YouTube please
0:17
check that address in the lower right
0:19
hand corner it's
0:21
youtube.com/ exlain amera and hit
0:23
subscribe absolutely free it really
0:26
helps us
0:27
out wow
0:30
Jack Smith and the Democrats not giving
0:32
up Jack Smith today releases his
0:35
report and he says he had enough
0:38
evidence to secure a conviction against
0:41
president-elect Donald Trump well of
0:42
course he said that he's the
0:45
prosecutor that's his job to say that
0:47
that's not a trial it's not evidence of
0:49
anything it's not proof of anything it
0:52
doesn't say that Trump would have been
0:53
convicted it's a prosecutor's opinion
0:56
and the
0:57
media treating it like gold you got some
1:00
people say well maybe this is the thing
1:01
that could stop Trump from from getting
1:03
the presidency no no no the the
1:05
Electoral College met the votes have
1:08
been counted by the Congress it's over
1:12
they're actually and I want you if
1:13
you're a Democrat watching this I want
1:15
you to take this into your soul and
1:18
understand what I'm about to tell you
1:19
because what I'm about to tell you is
1:20
not an opinion it's not a conservative
1:23
position it's a fact of life and I'll
1:26
tell you why cuz I had the same
1:29
conversation with Republicans around
1:31
this same time in
1:34
2020 where I explain to them what I'm
1:37
explaining to you
1:38
now it's
1:40
over there is no constitutional
1:43
mechanism to stop Donald John Trump from
1:46
becoming the next president of the
1:47
United States and if God forbid he was
1:50
struck by a b of lightning JD Vance
1:54
there is no constitutional mechanism to
1:56
stop
1:57
this there is nothing you can do you can
2:00
hold Jack Smith's report up to the
2:03
heavens and
2:04
scream there is no constitutional
2:07
mechanism to stop former president
2:10
Donald Trump president-elect Donald
2:13
Trump from becoming president Donald
2:15
Trump on January 20th nothing exists in
2:18
the law in the Constitution to stop that
2:22
the electoral votes have been counted
2:23
and certified and done that's it it's
2:27
over still I want you to watch video
2:30
about this and let me know what you
2:31
think in the
2:33
comments starting with this Fox News
2:35
Alert the justice department has
2:37
released former special counsel Jack
2:39
Smith's report on the investigation into
2:41
the Trump election interference case
2:44
Smith's final report sent to Congress
2:46
just after midnight claims that the
2:48
president-elect Donald Trump would have
2:51
been convicted if he had not won the
2:53
presidential race Smith writing quote it
2:56
has long been the Department's
2:58
interpretation that the Constitution
3:00
forbids the Federal indictment of a
3:02
prosecution of a sitting president but
3:05
for Mr Trump's election and imminent
3:07
return to the presidency the he's
3:09
talking about his own office the office
3:11
assessed that the admissible evidence
3:13
was sufficient to obtain and sustain a
3:16
conviction at trial Trump who had tried
3:19
to block the reports released responded
3:21
on Truth social saying quote deranged
3:24
Jack Smith was unable to Su to
3:26
successfully prosecute the political
3:29
opponent of his boss crooked Joe Biden
3:32
the voters have spoken all right uh the
3:35
newly released report is one of two
3:37
volumes put together by Smith here we go
3:40
volume two is regarding the classified
3:41
documents case attorney general Merrick
3:43
Carlin said he would not release that
3:46
since the code defendants are still
3:48
facing prosecution so expect that a
3:50
little bit uh later on let's bring in
3:52
constitutional law attorney former
3:54
Federal prosecutor Katie chowski Katie
3:56
it's not a big deal it's not news when a
3:59
prosecutor says he would have got a
4:00
conviction what's your takeaway from
4:03
what we just
4:04
learned well that's absolutely right
4:06
this is nothing more than a prosecution
4:08
on paper it's every Prosecutor's dream
4:10
you have no rebuttal you have no
4:11
cross-examination you don't actually
4:13
have to prove this case and in fact
4:15
nothing in this report is particularly
4:17
new Jack Smith had released the
4:19
indictment the superseding indictment
4:21
all the same facts are there the
4:22
American people overwhelmingly voted for
4:24
President Trump knowing all of what he
4:27
claims would have sustained this
4:28
conviction on these unprecedented
4:30
charges so quite frankly this is just a
4:33
partisan effort at lawfare yet again
4:35
couched in legal jargon so Katie he
4:38
focuses on a couple things he said that
4:40
he had to do this uh had to prosecute uh
4:44
the former president now President elect
4:46
because there were other J Sixers that
4:48
were prosecuted he then goes on and says
4:50
that he had to do this criminally
4:51
because the political uh Act of
4:55
impeachment wasn't enough but the thing
4:57
that got my attention was number three
4:59
when he talks about when the president
5:01
said peacefully and patriotically
5:04
protest but he says the president said
5:06
fight fight fight 10 times after that he
5:10
hinged It On fight fight fight my mind
5:13
goes to the most iconic moment of the
5:14
president which is when he was attempted
5:17
to be assassinated and he said fight
5:19
fight fight so how does he use that as
5:23
justification well there is obviously No
5:26
Smoking Gun evidence here and as you
5:28
pointed out all of these supposed pieces
5:30
of evidence are subject to
5:32
interpretation which is exactly the
5:33
point of our adversarial system exactly
5:35
the point of actually confronting the
5:37
prosecutions evidence with the rebuttal
5:40
such as what you just mentioned so again
5:43
the underlying issue with proving this
5:45
case was always going to be to prove the
5:47
Criminal Intent of Donald Trump and that
5:50
hasn't been established by this report
5:52
and I don't think it would have been
5:53
established in a courtroom with any sort
5:55
of due process but certainly I think
5:57
this is just a shame that this was
5:58
released I think that it is just pure
6:00
lawfare and serves absolutely no purpose
6:03
but to undermine Americans confidence in
6:05
the justice system one last time here
6:12
[Music]
News
Politics
Executive Branch
Campaigns & Elections