'Want Indictment To Be Thrown Out' - Massive Announcement In Trump Case

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and well the indictment against

Donald Trump, the one brought by Jack Smith, you know the new one that he's tried to massage

around the Supreme Court's decision, well it could be in a lot of trouble. Before we get started

please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe. Those little things really help us

out and they help our channel continue to grow and if you're not watching us on YouTube guys

that does really help us also. Please follow that address in the lower right hand corner

and it's just youtube.com forward slash at explain america. You go there, you hit subscribe

and it assists us so much in bringing conservative news to the people during this important election

season. Guys, Jack Smith brought a new case against Trump. The first case was dismissed

The Supreme Court has come down hard on what Trump's actually allowed to be charged with and

he's kind of massaged this around to turn official acts into unofficial acts to get around what the

Supreme Court said. Now I don't think it's going to work on the Trump team according to J.D. Vance

he speaks in this in this segment here, was on MSNBC, but according to J.D. Vance

the Trump team's trying to get this indictment thrown out completely and I don't blame them

It's flimsy, it's built on a house of cards, it's as my cousin Vinny says, it's like a magic

trick because the bricks are paper thin. So Jack Smith though, he's a bulldog. This guy has been

overturned by the Supreme Court. He's a mess. His career has been a lot of overreaching and I really

believe he's overreaching here because I believe that he believes he was hired to do a job and that

job wasn't to find the truth, it was to get Donald Trump and he knows that even if this indictment is

thrown out, the whole point of this indictment was to indict him again before the election

but it didn't get a lot of press. It was kind of a lead balloon really. It didn't get the press

I think that the Democrats and Jack Smith wanted it to get and I think people are just, they get

it now. It's lawfare and they see it. People are not dumb. People get what's happening. I want you

to watch this segment with J.D. Vance and then let me know what you think in the comments

Now Joyce, we can anticipate a significant amount of back and forth between Donald Trump's attorneys

arguing for a very very broad application of the Supreme Court's ruling and then obviously Jack

Smith looking to be narrow as possible in how that is done. If you're in the driver's seat

and you're looking at this objectively, how good do you feel about what could remain of all of

these indictments if the Supreme Court decision is broadly applied the way that Trump's lawyers

are going to seek to have it done? Well look, Trump's lawyers want the entire indictment to be

thrown out. It's unlikely that that will be the case and even the Supreme Court did not go that

far when they wrote this opinion because there's a lot of conduct involved in this indictment that

is personal conduct. That's the conduct of candidate Trump, not President Trump. Where

the lines will have to be drawn though in the Supreme Court, as you know we've discussed this

before, they didn't really establish a test for Judge Chutkan to use in deciding where that

dividing line between official and unofficial conduct is and perhaps more importantly when

the presumption against indicting or charging official conduct, when that presumption can be

overcome. She'll take the first cut at that but it's very clear that there will be another round

of appeals to engage in oversight over the decisions she makes