Trump Sentencing Stunner - Judge Makes His Decision

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and there has been

a stunner in the Trump hush money case and now we know why

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

And if you are not watching us on YouTube, please visit that address in the lower right

hand corner. It's youtube.com forward slash at Explain America. When you go there, hit subscribe absolutely free

It really helps us out. This week, Judge Juan Marchand of New York, he postponed the sentencing of former President

Donald Trump on his hush money case until after the election. Now a lot of people were speculating as to what the reason for that might be, but Judge

Jeanine Pirro, you know her from Fox News and the Five, she believes she has the answer

It's the same answer I gave to you yesterday. It's exactly what I believe

He thought if he sentenced Trump, it would only increase Trump's poll numbers

It would increase his support among the people and that could put Trump right back in the

White House. Well, I believe Juan Marchand, whose daughter fund raises for several Democrat candidates

does not want Trump back in the White House. And to that end, I think he thought that this was the best idea

Postpone the sentencing before dropping it on Trump in the middle of an election

Now it is the right thing to do in my opinion, but I don't think his reasons for doing it

were because he wanted to be kind to Trump or fair to Trump

I think he didn't want to assist Trump in the election. That's what I think happened

I do want you to watch this clip here with Jeanine Pirro and then let me know what you think happened

So listen to what Jeanine Pirro has to say and then let me know what you think in the comments

I am stunned. Look, this is a judge who at every turn ruled against Donald Trump

This is a judge who allowed prejudicial evidence to come in, evidence that had nothing to do

with the underlying charge. And speaking of the underlying charge, most of it is expired pursuant to the statute of

limitations bootstrapped and resurrected by another crime that the jury didn't have to

really identify. And there's a lot of hearsay and there's some privileged information

Then in the interim is a Supreme Court decision that came out in July that said, hey, you

have to separate immunity or immunize and privileged testimony from the underlying essence

of the crimes in this case. And now all of a sudden, Judge Mershawn is saying, well, I don't want to be political here

I think it's time that we took, you know, took note of the fact that we're in a presidential

election season. Are you kidding me? This is a political decision made by a judge who said, you know what

This is a close election. I'm not going to give Donald Trump any kind of advantage here

That's my interpretation. Based upon a judge who did everything he could, even the verdict sheet in this case is not

you don't you can't understand it. I've never seen anything like it

And so now suddenly the D.A., Martha agrees. The D.A. says we're not going to object to his sentencing

They want to throw him in jail. But they know that this is a case that will that will go in Trump's favor and they don't

want that to happen. So this is Alvin Bragg. There are so many cases that we've been keeping straight

But this was this was the hush money case. And you remember that Alvin Bragg basically took something that was beyond the statute

of limitations and extrapolated it into, I think, 34 counts. It was in the end, which had people outraged back then

Do you think that they are now looking at this situation and that they got cold feet

I mean, at one point, Mershawn did say back in the courtroom, you know, it's not lost

on me that I have someone here who may be the next president of the United States

Do you think that they just said, you know what, we don't we don't really want this on

our shoulders? Well, I think that it is inevitable that this case will be reversed

And I think that maybe Mershawn did everything he had to do, that he allowed in testimony

regarding a crime that nobody knows what it was and that in the end, they will be able

to say that Donald Trump is a convicted felon. He's been convicted on 34 counts

But you know what? We're going to delay the sentencing because maybe if they had this sentencing and Donald

Trump took an appeal, depending upon how quickly the appellate court wanted to rule on this

I mean, this is an important case where exigent circumstances would require an appellate court

to take it up immediately. They don't want to be slapped down either